1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MAY 4, 1998
REGISTRATION NO. 333-
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
MISSOURI 43-1627032
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
660 MASON RIDGE CENTER DRIVE, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63141-8557, (314) 453-7300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant's principal executive offices)
------------------------
JACK B. LAY
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
660 Mason Ridge Center Drive
St. Louis, Missouri 63141-8557
(314) 453-7300
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of agent for service)
------------------------
Copies to:
THOMAS C. ERB, ESQ. R. RANDALL WANG, ESQ.
LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C. BRYAN CAVE LLP
500 N. Broadway, Suite 2000 211 North Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2147 St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2750
(314) 444-7600 (314) 259-2000
------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE OF THE SECURITIES TO THE
PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration
Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plan, please check the following
box. [ ]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box: [ ]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [ ]
------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
============================================================================================================================
PROPOSED MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO OFFERING PRICE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED BE REGISTERED PER SHARE OFFERING PRICE REGISTRATION FEE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Voting Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share..................... (1) (1) $316,250,000(2) $93,293.75
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights....... (1)(3) (1)(3) (3) (3)
============================================================================================================================
(1) Amount to be registered and proposed maximum offering price per share
omitted pursuant to Rule 457(o).
(2) Includes $41,250,000 subject to the Underwriters' over-allotment option.
Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant
to Rule 457(o).
(3) Each share of Non-Voting Common Stock issued also represents one Preferred
Stock Purchase Right. Preferred Stock Purchase Rights cannot trade
separately from the underlying Non-Voting Common Stock and, therefore, do
not carry a separate price, or necessitate an additional registration fee.
------------------------
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall
file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration
Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a),
may determine.
================================================================================
2
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MAY , 1998
5,300,000 SHARES
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
RGA LOGO
NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK
------------------------
The 5,300,000 shares of non-voting common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(the "Non-Voting Common"), offered hereby (the "Offering") are being sold by
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated ("RGA"). The Non-Voting Common is a
newly created class of non-voting stock of RGA which is substantially similar to
its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Voting Common"), except that
it has no voting rights other than as required by Missouri law and includes
features designed to protect the holders thereof in the event of certain changes
in control of RGA. See "Description of Capital Stock -- Non-Voting Common."
GenAmerica Corporation beneficially owns approximately 64% of the Voting Common.
See "Principal Stockholders."
There is currently no public market for the Non-Voting Common. Application
has been made to list the Non-Voting Common on the New York Stock Exchange (the
"NYSE") under the symbol RGA.A, subject to official notice of issuance. It is
anticipated that the trading prices of the Non-Voting Common will approximate
the trading prices of the Voting Common. No assurances, however, can be given in
such regard. On May , 1998, the last reported sale price of the Voting Common,
listed on the NYSE under the symbol RGA, was $ per share. See "Price Range
of Capital Stock and Dividends."
------------------------
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS
THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE NON-VOTING COMMON
OFFERED HEREBY.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
=============================================================================================================
PRICE TO UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO
PUBLIC DISCOUNT(1) COMPANY(2)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Share........................ $ $ $
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total(3)......................... $ $ $
=============================================================================================================
(1) RGA has agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See
"Underwriting."
(2) Before deducting estimated expenses of $ payable by RGA.
(3) RGA has granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable within 30 days of
the date hereof, to purchase up to an additional 795,000 shares of
Non-Voting Common from RGA solely to cover over-allotments, if any. If such
option is exercised in full, the total Price to Public, Underwriting
Discount and Proceeds to Company will be $ , $ and
$ , respectively. See "Underwriting."
------------------------
The shares of Non-Voting Common are offered by the Underwriters, as
specified herein, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted
by them, subject to approval of certain legal matters by counsel for the
Underwriters and certain other conditions. The Underwriters reserve the right to
withdraw, cancel or modify such offer and to reject orders in whole or in part.
It is expected that delivery of the shares of Non-Voting Common will be made on
or about , 1998.
A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC.
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE
SECURITIES CORPORATION
CHASE SECURITIES INC.
CONNING & COMPANY
The date of this Prospectus is May , 1998
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY
OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES
EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR
TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE.
3
CERTAIN PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN THE OFFERING MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS
THAT STABILIZE, MAINTAIN OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF THE VOTING
COMMON OR THE NON-VOTING COMMON, INCLUDING OVER-ALLOTMENT, STABILIZING AND
SHORT-COVERING TRANSACTIONS IN SUCH SECURITIES AND THE IMPOSITION OF A PENALTY
BID, IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THESE ACTIVITIES, SEE
"UNDERWRITING."
-------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE COMMISSIONER
OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NOR HAS THE COMMISSIONER RULED UPON
THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS DOCUMENT.
-------------------------
Missouri insurance laws and regulations provide that no person may acquire
control of RGA, and thus indirect control of its Missouri insurance subsidiary,
RGA Reinsurance Company, unless such person has provided certain required
information to the Missouri Department of Insurance and such acquisition is
approved by the Director of Insurance of the State of Missouri (the "Missouri
Director of Insurance") after a public hearing. Under Missouri insurance laws
and regulations, any person acquiring 10% or more of the outstanding voting
stock of a corporation is presumed to have acquired control of that corporation
and its subsidiaries. Canadian insurance laws and regulations provide that no
person may acquire control of or a significant interest in RGA, and thus
indirect control of, or an indirect significant interest in, its Canadian
insurance subsidiary, RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada, unless such person
has provided certain required information to the Canadian Minister of Finance
and such acquisition is approved by such Minister. Under Canadian insurance laws
and regulations, "significant interest" means the direct or indirect beneficial
ownership of shares representing 10% or more of a given class, while "control"
of an insurance company is presumed to exist when a person beneficially owns or
controls an entity that beneficially owns shares representing more than 50% of
the votes entitled to be cast for the election of directors and such votes are
sufficient to elect a majority of the directors of the insurance company.
Although the Non-Voting Common offered hereby is not expected to constitute
"voting stock" for purposes of the foregoing provisions, such stock is
convertible on a share-for-share basis into Voting Common of RGA under certain
limited circumstances and, in the event of any such conversion, the shares
offered hereby would constitute "voting stock" for purposes of the foregoing
provisions. See "Description of Capital Stock -- Non-Voting Common -- Conversion
of Non-Voting Common."
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements included or incorporated in this Prospectus regarding future
financial performance and results and the other statements that are not
historical facts are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of
earnings, revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, plans for future
operations and financing needs or plans, as well as assumptions relating to the
foregoing. The words "intend," "expect," "project," "estimate," "predict,"
"anticipate," "should," "believe" and similar expressions also are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently
subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or
quantified. Future events and actual results, performance and achievements could
differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially (the "Cautionary Statements") include, but are not limited to, (i)
the absence of an existing public market for the Non-Voting Common and
uncertainty as to the levels of future trading activity or prices for such
shares, (ii) general economic conditions affecting the demand for insurance and
reinsurance in the Company's (as hereinafter defined) current and planned
markets, (iii) material changes in mortality and claims experience, (iv)
competitive factors and competitors' responses to the Company's initiatives,
(v) successful execution of the Company's entry into new markets, (vi)
successful development and introduction of new products,
1
4
(vii) the stability of governments and economies in foreign markets, (viii)
fluctuations in U.S. and foreign interest rates and securities and real estate
markets, (ix) the success of the Company's clients, including General American
Life Insurance Company ("General American") and its affiliates, (x) changes in
laws, regulations and accounting standards applicable to RGA and its
subsidiaries, and (xi) other risks and uncertainties described in this
Prospectus and in RGA's other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission"). Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. All subsequent written
and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons
acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary
Statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements
after the completion of this Offering to reflect events or circumstances after
the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
2
5
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read
in conjunction with, the more detailed information and Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto set forth elsewhere in this Prospectus or
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. The principal subsidiaries of RGA
are RGA Reinsurance Company ("RGA Reinsurance") and RGA Life Reinsurance Company
of Canada ("RGA Canada"). The term "Company," as used herein, refers
collectively to RGA and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Unless otherwise
indicated, the information in this Prospectus assumes no exercise of the
Underwriters' over-allotment option.
THE COMPANY
RGA, through its operating subsidiaries, is one of the largest life
reinsurers in North America. At December 31, 1997, the Company had assets of
$4.7 billion, stockholders' equity of $499.3 million and assumed reinsurance in
force of $227.3 billion. The Company's core North American life reinsurance
business serves as the platform for its business strategy of further expansion
into selected domestic and international markets. Over the past five years, the
Company has produced a strong and consistent record of growth and profitability,
with revenue and net income (excluding the accident and health pool charge in
1997) growing at compound annual rates of approximately 24% and 18%,
respectively.
The Company's approach to the North American market, which represented 76%
of net premiums in 1997, has been to (i) focus on large, high quality life
insurers as clients, (ii) provide superior facultative underwriting and
competitive automatic reinsurance capacity, and (iii) deliver responsive and
flexible service to its clients. Management believes it is the largest
facultative life reinsurer in North America. The Company conducted business with
80 of the 100 largest U.S. and 35 of the 40 largest Canadian life insurance
companies in 1997, with no one client representing more than 7% of consolidated
gross premiums.
The Company has also developed its capacity and expertise in
non-traditional reinsurance, which includes asset-intensive products and
financial reinsurance. In 1997, the Company's North American non-traditional
reinsurance business earned $12.8 million or 13% of income before income taxes
and minority interest (excluding the accident and health pool charge). The
Company's non-traditional business currently includes reinsurance of stable
value products, bank-owned life insurance and annuities.
The Company leverages its underwriting expertise and industry knowledge as
it expands into selected international markets. Its operations outside North
America currently include direct and reinsurance business from joint ventures
and subsidiaries in Latin America, Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom,
as well as reinsurance of life products and related coverages offered
principally in Hong Kong and Japan through RGA Reinsurance.
RGA Reinsurance has an "AA" claims paying rating from Standard & Poors
("S&P") and an "A+" claims paying rating from A.M. Best and Company, Inc.
("A.M. Best"). The S&P and A.M. Best claims paying ratings are based upon an
insurance company's ability to pay policyholder obligations and are not directed
toward the protection of investors. In addition, RGA has an "A" long-term debt
rating from S&P.
During 1997, the Company made a strategic decision to cease marketing
accident and health reinsurance and to place its existing portfolio into runoff.
While this business contributed approximately 11% of reinsurance premiums for
1997, the Company does not expect the termination of this business to materially
affect future results. Management intends to redirect its focus to its core
North American and emerging businesses.
The Company believes that the following trends in the insurance industry
are increasing the demand for life reinsurance.
- INCREASED CAPITAL SENSITIVITY. Regulatory environment and competitive
business pressures are causing life insurers to reinsure as a means to
(i) manage risk-based capital by shifting mortality and other risks and
distribution costs to reinsurers, (ii) release capital to pursue new
businesses, and (iii) unlock the capital supporting, and value embedded
in, non-core product lines.
3
6
- CONSOLIDATION AND REORGANIZATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRY. The number of
merger and acquisition transactions within the U.S. life insurance
industry increased to 136 in 1997, from 63 in 1993. Management believes
that U.S. reorganizations of life insurers (such as demutualizations) and
international consolidation will continue to increase. As reinsurance
products are increasingly used to finance these transactions and manage
risk, demand for the Company's products is expected to increase.
- CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS OF INSURED POPULATIONS. The aging of the population
in North America is increasing demand for financial products among "baby
boomers" who are concerned about protecting their peak income stream and
are considering retirement and estate planning. This trend is likely to
result in increased demand for annuity products and life insurance
policies, larger face amounts of life insurance policies and higher
mortality risk taken by life insurers, all of which should cause such
insurers to seek reinsurance products.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company continues to follow its two-part business strategy to
capitalize on industry trends and to achieve its goal of producing consistent
revenue and earnings growth.
- CONTINUE GROWTH OF CORE NORTH AMERICAN BUSINESS. The Company's strategy
includes continuing to grow each of the following components of its North
American operations:
-- FACULTATIVE REINSURANCE. The Company intends to maintain its leading
position as a facultative underwriter in North America by emphasizing
its high underwriting standards, prompt response on quotes,
competitive pricing, capacity and flexibility in meeting customer
needs.
-- AUTOMATIC REINSURANCE. The Company intends to expand its already
significant presence in the North American automatic reinsurance
market by using its recognized mortality expertise and breadth of
products and services to gain additional market share.
-- IN FORCE BLOCK REINSURANCE. The Company anticipates increased
opportunities to grow its business of reinsuring "in force block"
insurance, as insurers seek to exit various non-core businesses and
increase financial flexibility in order to, among other things,
redeploy capital and pursue merger and acquisition activity.
- CONTINUE EXPANSION INTO SELECTED MARKETS. The Company's strategy includes
building upon the expertise and relationships developed from its core
North American business platform to continue its expansion into selected
markets, including:
-- NON-TRADITIONAL REINSURANCE. The Company intends to continue
leveraging its existing client relationships and reinsurance
expertise to create customized non-traditional reinsurance products
and solutions. Industry trends, particularly the increased pace of
consolidation and reorganization among life insurance companies and
changes in product distribution, are expected to create significant
growth opportunities for non-traditional reinsurance.
-- OTHER INTERNATIONAL. Management believes that international markets
offer substantial opportunities for growth, and has capitalized on
this opportunity by establishing a presence in selected markets. The
Company uses its reinsurance expertise, facultative underwriting
abilities and market knowledge as it continues to enter mature and
emerging insurance markets.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Company reported a 19% increase in operating income, to $15.3 million,
or $0.60 per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, compared to $12.9
million, or $0.50 per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 1997, excluding the
impact of an after-tax accident and health pool charge taken in the first
quarter of 1997 in the amount of $10.4 million, or $0.40 per share. Net
premiums, net investment income and total revenues increased 31% to $270.0
million, 52% to $63.7 million and 35% to $341.1 million, respectively, for the
quarter
4
7
ended March 31, 1998, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 1997. The Company
reported total assets of approximately $5.1 billion at March 31, 1998.
------------------------
RGA's principal executive office is located at 660 Mason Ridge Center
Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63141-8557, and its telephone number is (314)
453-7300.
5
8
THE OFFERING
Non-Voting Common offered by
RGA......................... 5,300,000 shares.(1)
Non-Voting Common outstanding
after Offering.............. 5,300,000 shares.(1)(3)
Voting Common outstanding
after Offering.............. shares.(2)(3)
Use of proceeds............... RGA intends to use the net proceeds from the
Offering for general corporate purposes. See
"Use of Proceeds."
New York Stock Exchange
symbol........................ Application has been made to list the
Non-Voting Common on the NYSE under the symbol
RGA.A, subject to official notice of issuance.
The Voting Common is currently traded on the
NYSE under the symbol RGA.
- -------------------------
(1) Does not include up to 795,000 shares of Non-Voting Common subject to the
Underwriters' over-allotment option.
(2) Based upon the number of shares of Voting Common outstanding as of May 1,
1998. Does not include 960,314 shares of Voting Common subject to
outstanding stock options and employee benefit plans and 360,035 shares that
were available for additional awards under such plans.
(3) The number of authorized shares of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common shown
herein assumes that RGA's Restated Articles of Incorporation will be amended
as proposed at RGA's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 27, 1998. See
"Description of Capital Stock."
TERMS OF NON-VOTING COMMON
The powers, preferences and rights of the Voting Common and the Non-Voting
Common, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, are in all
respects identical, except as otherwise required by law or expressly provided in
RGA's Restated Articles of Incorporation. See "Description of Capital Stock."
No voting rights.............. The Non-Voting Common will not entitle the
holder thereof to any voting rights, except as
otherwise required by law.
Dividends and other
distributions................. The Non-Voting Common is equal to the Voting
Common in relative to dividends and other
distributions in cash, property, or shares of
stock of RGA (including distributions in
connection with any recapitalization), subject
to certain exceptions described herein. In no
event will shares of either Voting Common or
Non-Voting Common be split, subdivided or
combined unless the other is proportionately
split, subdivided or combined.
Business combinations;
dissolution................... In the event of a merger, consolidation,
combination or similar transaction of RGA with
another entity (whether or not RGA is the
surviving entity) or in the event of a
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of RGA,
the holders of Non-Voting Common will be
entitled to receive the same per share
consideration as the per share consideration,
if any, received by holders of Voting Common in
that transaction. Any capital stock, however,
that holders of Non-Voting Common become
entitled to receive in any merger,
consolidation, combination or similar
transaction may have terms substantially
similar to the terms of the Non-Voting Common
itself.
6
9
Other Non-Voting Common
protections................... The terms of the Non-Voting Common include two
"protection" provisions designed to reduce the
possibility that holders of Non-Voting Common
could be treated unfairly in the event that a
person attempts to acquire control of RGA. The
first provision seeks to prevent a person who
has crossed a certain ownership threshold from
gaining control of RGA by acquiring Voting
Common without buying Non-Voting Common. Under
this provision, anyone who acquires more than
15% of the outstanding Voting Common after May
27, 1998 (the "Effective Date") and does not
acquire a percentage of the Non-Voting Common
outstanding at least equal to the percentage of
Voting Common that the person acquired above
the 15% threshold will not be allowed to vote
the Voting Common acquired in excess of the 15%
level. The second provision is an "equitable
price" requirement which is intended to prevent
a person seeking to acquire control of RGA from
paying a discounted price for the Non-Voting
Common required to be purchased by the
acquiring person under the first provision.
Conversion.................... The Non-Voting Common will be automatically
converted into Voting Common on a
share-for-share basis if (i) as a result of the
existence of the Non-Voting Common, the Voting
Common or the Non-Voting Common or both becomes
excluded from trading on all principal national
securities exchanges and also is excluded from
quotation on The Nasdaq Stock Market's National
Market or any other comparable national
quotation system then in use, or (ii) at any
time the number of outstanding shares of Voting
Common as reflected on RGA's stock transfer
books falls below 10% of the aggregate number
of outstanding shares of Voting Common and
Non-Voting Common.
Shareholder Rights Plan....... Rights under RGA's Shareholder Rights Plan, as
amended, also will attach to the Non-Voting
Common. See "Description of Capital
Stock -- Preferred Stock Purchase Rights."
7
10
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Net premiums....................................... $ 835.5 $674.9 $570.0 $451.7 $379.9
Net investment income.............................. 188.3 136.8 90.1 71.3 60.3
Realized investment gains, net..................... 0.3 0.9 -- 0.8 3.6
Other revenue...................................... 47.4 17.4 8.0 1.9 2.7
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------
Total revenues................................ 1,071.5 830.0 668.1 525.7 446.5
Income before income taxes and minority interest... 84.1(1) 87.1 74.6 64.4 54.9
Net income......................................... 54.6(1) 55.1 47.3 40.4 34.1
Basic earnings per share........................... 2.15(1) 2.18 1.87 1.57 1.50
Diluted earnings per share......................... 2.13(1) 2.17 1.87 1.57 1.50
Cash dividends per share........................... 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.08
Weighted average diluted shares (in thousands)..... 25,604 25,410 25,292 25,728 22,736
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Invested assets.................... $ 3,634.0 $ 2,272.0 $ 1,405.5 $ 1,016.6 $ 920.6
Total assets....................... 4,673.6 2,893.7 1,989.9 1,394.3 1,249.6
Policy liabilities................. 3,558.7 2,068.6 1,408.3 1,043.9 886.5
Total debt......................... 106.8 106.5 -- -- --
Stockholders' equity............... 499.3 425.6 376.9 276.8 279.4
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
Assumed ordinary life reinsurance
business in force................ $227,259.7 $168,339.3 $153,861.2 $142,374.0 $114,666.4
Assumed new business production.... 75,861.9 37,905.5 35,997.7 43,203.3 24,670.7
Book value per share(2)............ 17.14 15.60 13.63 11.87 10.71
Statutory capital and surplus(3)... 274.6 277.2 249.4 232.7 240.5
Return on equity, as adjusted(4)... 15.7% 14.6% 14.6% 13.7% 12.0%
- -------------------------
(1) Includes the effect of the $18.0 million charge for accident and health
insurance pool reserve increase. Excluding the effect of the charge, income
before taxes and minority interest, net income, basic earnings per share and
diluted earnings per share would have been $102.1 million, $65.0 million,
$2.55 per share and $2.53 per share, respectively.
(2) Book value per share is calculated by dividing end of period stockholders'
equity (excluding unrealized investment gains and losses) by end-of-period
common shares outstanding.
(3) Amounts have been derived from the statements filed with the regulatory
authorities in the country where the operating subsidiary is domiciled. The
primary subsidiaries are RGA Reinsurance Company which files with the
Missouri Department of Insurance and RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada
which files with the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
in Canada.
(4) Return on average stockholders' equity is calculated by dividing net income
(excluding the accident and health pool charge in 1997 and realized
investment gains) by average stockholders' equity for the period (which is
the simple average of beginning- and end-of-period stockholders' equity
excluding unrealized investment gains and losses).
8
11
RISK FACTORS
Prospective investors should consider, in addition to the information set
forth under "Forward-Looking Statements" and elsewhere in this Prospectus, the
following matters in evaluating an investment in the Non-Voting Common offered
hereby.
NON-VOTING COMMON SHARES
The Non-Voting Common has no voting rights other than those required by
Missouri law and is convertible into Voting Common only under certain limited
circumstances described herein. Consequently, holders of Non-Voting Common will
not be entitled to elect directors or vote on other matters customarily decided
by stockholders, such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of all or
substantially all of the Company's assets. See "Description of Capital
Stock -- Non-Voting Common -- Voting Matters."
CONTROL BY GENAMERICA CORPORATION
GenAmerica Corporation beneficially owns approximately 64% of the Voting
Common and individuals employed by or associated with GenAmerica Corporation
hold a majority of the seats on RGA's Board of Directors. GenAmerica Corporation
is a wholly owned subsidiary of General American Mutual Holding Company and is
the parent corporation of General American. Upon consummation of the Offering,
GenAmerica Corporation will continue to have the power, because of the voting
power of the shares of Voting Common held by it, to elect RGA's Board of
Directors, and to substantially influence business combination transactions. For
financial reporting purposes, GenAmerica Corporation will include its share of
the Company's net income or loss in its consolidated financial statements. RGA's
Board of Directors, including members who are also affiliated with GenAmerica
Corporation, may consider not only the short-term and long-term impact of
operating decisions on the Company, but also the impact of such decisions on
GenAmerica Corporation and its affiliates, including General American. See
"Management," "Principal Stockholders," "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" and "Description of Capital Stock."
NO PRIOR TRADING HISTORY
The Non-Voting Common is a newly created class of non-voting stock of RGA
and no public market currently exists for such stock. The public offering price
for the Non-Voting Common was determined through negotiations between RGA and
representatives of the Underwriters and may not be indicative of the market
price for the Non-Voting Common following the Offering. See "Underwriting".
Although application has been made for the Non-Voting Common to be listed on the
NYSE, upon official notice of issuance, there can be no assurance that an active
trading market will develop after the Offering or, if developed, that such a
market will be sustained. It also is possible that the Non-Voting Common will
trade at prices that differ from those of the Voting Common. If the Voting
Common were to trade at a premium to the Non-Voting Common, subsequent issuances
of Non-Voting Common, instead of Voting Common, in connection with a public or
private offering, an acquisition or other transaction could have a greater
dilutive effect on stockholders because such an acquisition or transaction would
require more shares to deliver the same aggregate value. To minimize dilution of
voting power to existing stockholders, RGA may be more likely to issue shares of
Non-Voting Common than Voting Common in the future to raise equity, finance
acquisitions or fund employee benefit plans.
9
12
USE OF PROCEEDS
The purpose of the Offering is to support the continued growth of the
Company's business and to maintain its capital structure. The net proceeds to be
received by RGA from the Offering (at an assumed public offering price of
$ ), after deducting the underwriting discount and concessions and
estimated offering expenses, are estimated to be approximately $
(approximately $ if the over-allotment option is exercised in full).
RGA intends to use the net proceeds from the Offering for general corporate
purposes. Pending their use for such purposes, the net proceeds will be invested
primarily in investment grade securities.
PRICE RANGE OF CAPITAL STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
The Voting Common is listed for trading on the NYSE under the symbol RGA
and application has been made to list the Non-Voting Common on the NYSE under
the symbol RGA.A, subject to official notice of issuance. The Non-Voting Common
is a new issue of stock for RGA and, as a result, it does not have any trading
or dividend history. The following table sets forth the high and low sales
prices and cash dividends declared per share of Voting Common for the periods
indicated (as adjusted for the three-for-two stock split effected August 29,
1997). The Offering relates to shares of Non-Voting Common.
VOTING COMMON
PRICE RANGE
--------------------
HIGH LOW DIVIDENDS
---- --- ---------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
First quarter................................... $27.417 $22.583 $0.047
Second quarter.................................. 27.750 24.417 0.047
Third quarter................................... 29.500 24.583 0.053
Fourth quarter.................................. 33.000 28.833 0.053
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
First quarter................................... $32.833 $29.917 $0.053
Second quarter.................................. 38.333 31.083 0.053
Third quarter................................... 41.583 37.500 0.060
Fourth quarter.................................. 46.438 37.813 0.060
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
First quarter................................... $51.188 $38.375 $0.060
Second quarter (through May 1, 1998)............ 50.125 47.250 0.060
As of , 1998, there were approximately
holders of record of the Voting Common. The last reported
sales price of the Voting Common on the NYSE on May , 1998 was $ per
share. The Offering relates to shares of Non-Voting Common.
The holders of the Voting Common and the Non-Voting Common will be entitled
to receive ratably any cash dividends as may be declared by RGA's Board of
Directors. See "Description of Capital Stock -- Non-Voting Common -- Dividends
and Other Distributions." The declaration and payment of future dividends to
holders of the Voting Common and the Non-Voting Common will be at the discretion
of RGA's Board of Directors and will depend upon RGA's earnings and financial
condition, capital requirements of its subsidiaries, insurance regulatory
condition and considerations and such other factors as RGA's Board of Directors
may deem relevant.
As a holding company, RGA is ultimately dependent upon its subsidiaries to
provide funding for its operating expenses, debt service and dividends. Various
insurance laws applicable to RGA's subsidiaries limit the payment of dividends
and other distributions by such subsidiaries to RGA and may therefore limit the
ability of RGA to make dividend payments. See
"Business -- Regulation -- Restrictions on Dividends and Distributions."
10
13
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the unaudited consolidated capitalization of
the Company at December 31, 1997, and as adjusted to reflect the sale by RGA of
shares of Non-Voting Common (at an assumed public offering price
of $ ) offered hereby (assuming no exercise of the Underwriters' over-
allotment option), after deducting the underwriting discount and concessions and
estimated offering expenses.
DECEMBER 31, 1997
-------------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED
-------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Long-term debt.............................................. $106,830 $106,830
-------- --------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share; 10,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding..... -- --
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 75,000,000 shares
authorized, 26,049,375 shares issued and
outstanding(1)(3)...................................... 261 261
Non-Voting Common Stock, par value $.01 per share;
20,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued
(as adjusted)(2)(3)....................................
Additional paid in capital................................ 264,748
Currency translation adjustments.......................... (8,201) (8,201)
Unrealized appreciation of securities, net of taxes....... 67,290 67,290
Retained earnings......................................... 196,685 196,685
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity before treasury
stock........................................... 520,783
Less cost of 844,535 shares reacquired and held in
treasury............................................... (21,462) (21,462)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 499,321
-------- --------
Total capitalization........................................ $606,151 $
======== ========
- -------------------------
(1) Based upon the number of shares of Voting Common outstanding as of May 1,
1998. Does not include 960,314 shares of Voting Common subject to
outstanding stock options and employee benefit plans and 360,035 shares that
were available for additional awards under such plans.
(2) Does not include up to shares of Non-Voting Common subject to the
Underwriters' over-allotment option.
(3) The number of authorized shares of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common shown
herein assumes that RGA's Restated Articles of Incorporation will be amended
as proposed at RGA's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 27, 1998. See
"Description of Capital Stock."
11
14
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
The selected consolidated financial data presented below for, and as of the
end of, each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 1997, have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
stock life companies. The following selected financial data should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Revenues:
Net premiums.................................. $ 835.5 $ 674.9 $ 570.0 $ 451.7 $ 379.9
Net investment income......................... 188.3 136.8 90.1 71.3 60.3
Realized investment gains, net................ 0.3 0.9 -- 0.8 3.6
Other revenue................................. 47.4 17.4 8.0 1.9 2.7
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total revenues....................... 1,071.5 830.0 668.1 525.7 446.5
Benefits and Expenses:
Claims and other policy benefits.............. 640.1 505.7 430.0 329.4 276.4
Interest credited............................. 92.0 54.7 33.8 28.8 24.7
Accident and health pool charge(1)............ 18.0 -- -- -- --
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses.................................... 176.5 136.5 98.1 78.6 70.9
Other operating expenses...................... 53.0 39.8 31.6 24.5 19.6
Interest expense.............................. 7.8 6.2 -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total benefits and expenses.......... 987.4 742.9 593.5 461.3 391.6
Income before income taxes and minority
interest.................................... 84.1(1) 87.1 74.6 64.4 54.9
Income tax expense............................ 28.8 31.7 27.1 23.7 20.2
Minority interest............................. 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income.................................... $ 54.6(1) $ 55.1 $ 47.3 $ 40.4 $ 34.1
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Basic earnings per share...................... $ 2.15(1) $ 2.18 $ 1.87 $ 1.57 $ 1.50
Diluted earnings per share.................... 2.13(1) 2.17 1.87 1.57 1.50
Cash dividends per share...................... 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.08
Weighted average diluted shares, in
thousands................................... 25,604 25,410 25,292 25,728 22,736
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Invested assets............................... $ 3,634.0 $ 2,272.0 $ 1,405.5 $ 1,016.6 $ 920.6
Total assets.................................. 4,673.6 2,893.7 1,989.9 1,394.3 1,249.6
Policy liabilities............................ 3,558.7 2,068.6 1,408.3 1,043.9 886.5
Long-term debt................................ 106.8 106.5 -- -- --
Total debt.................................... 106.8 106.5 -- -- --
Stockholders' equity.......................... 499.3 425.6 376.9 276.8 279.4
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
Assumed ordinary life reinsurance business in
force....................................... $227,259.7 $168,339.3 $153,861.2 $142,374.0 $114,666.4
Assumed new business production............... 75,861.9 37,905.5 35,997.7 43,203.3 24,670.7
Book value per share(2)....................... 17.14 15.60 13.63 11.87 10.71
Statutory capital and surplus(3).............. 274.6 277.2 249.4 232.7 240.5
Return on equity, as adjusted(4).............. 15.7% 14.6% 14.6% 13.7% 12.0%
- -------------------------
(1) Represents an increase to accident and health reserves associated with
run-off claims from certain outside-managed accident and health insurance
pools. Excluding the effect of the charge, income before taxes and minority
interest, net income, basic earnings per share, and diluted earnings per
share would have been $102.1 million, $65.0 million, $2.55 per share and
$2.53 per share, respectively.
(2) Book value per share is calculated by dividing end of period stockholders'
equity (excluding unrealized investment gains and losses) by end of the
period common shares outstanding.
(3) Amounts have been derived from the statements filed with the regulatory
authorities in the country where the operating subsidiary is domiciled. The
primary subsidiaries are RGA Reinsurance Company which files with the
Missouri Department of Insurance and RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada
which files with the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
in Canada.
(4) Return on average stockholders' equity is calculated by dividing net income
(excluding the accident and health pool charge in 1997 and realized
investment gains) by average stockholders' equity for the period (which is
the simple average of beginning and end of the period stockholders' equity
excluding unrealized investment gains and losses).
12
15
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data' included elsewhere in this Prospectus and the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company (and the Notes thereto)
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. On August 29, 1997, RGA effected a
three-for-two stock split on the Voting Common. All share information is
presented herein on a post-split basis, except where otherwise indicated.
OVERVIEW
The Company derives revenues primarily from renewal premiums from existing
reinsurance treaties, new business premiums from existing or new reinsurance
treaties, and income earned on invested assets, as well as direct insurance
premiums from its Latin American subsidiaries.
The Company's primary business is life reinsurance, which involves
reinsuring life insurance policies that are often in force for the lifetime of
the underlying individual insureds, with premiums earned typically over a period
of 10 to 30 years. Each year, however, a portion of the business under existing
treaties terminates due to, among other things, voluntary surrenders of
underlying life insurance policies, lapses of underlying policies, deaths of
underlying insureds, and the exercise of recapture options.
Most of the Company's existing life reinsurance treaties provide for
contractual increases in premium rates. These premium increases are constructed
to offset expected increases in claims associated with insureds' advancing ages.
New business premiums during each of the last three years have contributed more
than $130.0 million to total net premiums for each period. "New business" refers
to reinsurance resulting from newly issued underlying policies or blocks of
existing business, regardless of whether the reinsurance is associated with new
or existing treaties.
Insurance in force for the Company increased $59.0 billion to $227.3
billion at December 31, 1997. New business production for 1997 totaled $75.9
billion compared to $37.9 billion in 1996 and $36.0 billion in 1995. Significant
growth in new business in U.S. and Latin American operations contributed to most
of this increase.
As is customary in the reinsurance business, life insurance clients
continually update, refine, and revise reinsurance information provided to the
Company. Such revised information is used by the Company in the preparation of
its financial statements and the financial effects resulting from the
incorporation of revised data are reflected in income currently.
The Company's profitability primarily depends on the volume and amount of
death claims incurred. While death claims are reasonably predictable over a
period of many years, claims become less predictable over shorter periods and
are subject to fluctuation from quarter to quarter and year to year. RGA
Reinsurance has catastrophe insurance coverage issued by an insurer rated "A" by
A.M. Best that provides benefits of up to $100.0 million per occurrence for
claims involving three or more deaths in a single accident, with a deductible of
$1.5 million per occurrence. This coverage is terminable annually on 90 days
notice and is ultimately provided through a pool of seventeen unaffiliated
insurers. The Company believes such catastrophe insurance coverage is adequate
to protect it from risks of multiple deaths of lives reinsured by policies with
RGA Reinsurance in a single accident. Additionally, the Company's practice is to
limit its retention to $2.5 million on any one insured life.
The Company has foreign currency risk on business conducted in foreign
currency to the extent that the exchange rate of the foreign currency is subject
to adverse change over time. The Company's Canadian operations transact business
in Canadian dollars. The exchange rate from Canadian to U.S. currency was
0.6992, 0.7297, and 0.7344 at December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
The Company's Latin American operations primarily conduct business in Chilean
pesos and Argentine dollars. The exchange rate from these currencies to the U.S.
currency remained relatively stable during 1997, 1996, and 1995. The business
generated from the Asia Pacific region is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars
and Australian dollars and the Company was not materially affected by the
decline in the foreign exchange rates within the Asia Pacific region during
1997.
13
16
The Company has four main operational segments: U.S., Canadian, other
international, and accident and health. The U.S. operations provide life
reinsurance and non-traditional reinsurance to domestic clients. Non-
traditional business includes asset-intensive and financial reinsurance.
Asset-intensive products include reinsurance of stable value products,
bank-owned life insurance, and annuities. The Canadian operations provide
insurers with traditional reinsurance as well as assistance with capital
management activity. The other international operations include results from
Latin American operations, Asia Pacific operations, and Market Development
operations. Other international business includes direct and reinsurance
business from a joint venture and subsidiaries in Latin America, Australia, and
the United Kingdom, as well as reinsurance of life and health products through
RGA Reinsurance. Latin American direct business is comprised primarily of
Chilean single-premium annuities and Argentine group life and universal life
products. The accident and health operations include both domestic and
international reinsurance. Due to continuing losses emanating from certain of
the Company's accident and health operations in 1997, the strategic decision was
made to exit all outside-managed accident and health pools and cease marketing
accident and health business and to place the operation into run-off. The
operational segment results do not include the corporate investment activity,
general expenses and interest expense of RGA. See "Business -- Industry
Segments."
The following tables set forth selected information concerning the
Company's four main operating segments for the indicated periods.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
U.S. OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL
------------------------
ASSET FINANCIAL
TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE TOTAL
----------- --------- ----------- --------
REVENUES:
Net premiums...................................... $554,253 $ -- $ -- $554,253
Investment income, net of related expenses........ 98,666 55,636 -- 154,302
Realized investment gains/(losses), net........... 1,816 (1,726) -- 90
Other revenue..................................... 872 -- 25,308 26,180
-------- ------- ------- --------
Total revenues................................. 655,607 53,910 25,308 734,825
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits.................. 405,590 2,414 -- 408,004
Interest credited................................. 42,564 48,102 -- 90,666
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses....................................... 89,556 1,548 14,368 105,472
Other operating expenses.......................... 20,924 -- -- 20,924
-------- ------- ------- --------
Total benefits and expenses.................... 558,634 52,064 14,368 625,066
-------- ------- ------- --------
Income before income taxes and minority
interest..................................... $ 96,973 $ 1,846 $10,940 $109,759
======== ======= ======= ========
14
17
U.S. OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL
------------------------
ASSET FINANCIAL
TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE TOTAL
----------- --------- ----------- --------
REVENUES:
Net premiums...................................... $486,431 $ -- $ -- $486,431
Investment income, net of related expenses........ 87,163 24,638 -- 111,801
Realized investment (losses), net................. (1,340) -- -- (1,340)
Other revenue..................................... (564) -- 16,957 16,393
-------- ------- ------- --------
Total revenues................................. 571,690 24,638 16,957 613,285
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits.................. 360,081 -- -- 360,081
Interest credited................................. 34,168 20,224 -- 54,392
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses....................................... 80,667 3,044 12,841 96,552
Other operating expenses.......................... 17,768 -- -- 17,768
-------- ------- ------- --------
Total benefits and expenses.................... 492,684 23,268 12,841 528,793
-------- ------- ------- --------
Income before income taxes and minority
interest..................................... $ 79,006 $ 1,370 $ 4,116 $ 84,492
======== ======= ======= ========
U.S. OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL
------------------------
ASSET FINANCIAL
TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE TOTAL
----------- --------- ----------- --------
REVENUES:
Net premiums....................................... $414,133 $ -- $ -- $414,133
Investment income, net of related expenses......... 73,093 866 -- 73,959
Realized investment gains, net..................... 640 -- -- 640
Other revenue...................................... (318) -- 7,742 7,424
-------- ---- ------ --------
Total revenues.................................. 487,548 866 7,742 496,156
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits................... 311,974 -- -- 311,974
Interest credited.................................. 33,023 768 -- 33,791
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses........................................ 65,526 34 6,037 71,597
Other operating expenses........................... 15,367 -- -- 15,367
-------- ---- ------ --------
Total benefits and expenses..................... 425,890 802 6,037 432,729
-------- ---- ------ --------
Income before income taxes and minority
interest...................................... $ 61,658 $ 64 $1,705 $ 63,427
======== ==== ====== ========
15
18
CANADIAN OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- ------- -------
REVENUES:
Net premiums.............................................. $ 83,563 $63,118 $49,248
Investment income, net of related expenses................ 16,321 12,722 11,064
Realized investment gains/(losses), net................... 109 2,419 (198)
Other revenue............................................. 20,152 290 201
-------- ------- -------
Total revenues......................................... 120,145 78,549 60,315
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits.......................... 74,972 48,983 36,683
Interest credited......................................... 1,293 287 --
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses..... 22,411 10,161 8,087
Other operating expenses.................................. 6,387 5,682 4,665
-------- ------- -------
Total benefits and expenses............................ 105,063 65,113 49,435
-------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes and minority interest....... $ 15,082 $13,436 $10,880
======== ======= =======
OTHER INTERNATIONAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
LATIN AMERICA
---------------------- ASIA OTHER
DIRECT REINSURANCE PACIFIC MARKETS TOTAL
------- ----------- ------- ------- --------
REVENUES:
Net premiums.............................. $56,460 $11,730 $36,591 $ 2,170 $106,951
Investment income, net of related
expenses............................... 7,067 1,701 1,730 378 10,876
Realized investment gains, net............ -- -- 14 -- 14
Other revenue............................. 185 -- -- 332 517
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Total revenues......................... 63,712 13,431 38,335 2,880 118,358
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits.......... 53,181 10,327 21,164 1,755 86,427
Interest credited......................... 82 -- -- -- 82
Policy acquisition costs and other
insurance expenses..................... 3,820 329 15,616 479 20,244
Other operating expenses.................. 6,553 2,962 6,119 3,680 19,314
Interest expense.......................... -- -- 468 -- 468
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Total benefits and expenses............ 63,636 13,618 43,367 5,914 126,535
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Income/(loss) before income taxes and
minority interest.................... $ 76 $ (187) $(5,032) $(3,034) $ (8,177)
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
16
19
OTHER INTERNATIONAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS)
LATIN AMERICA
---------------------- ASIA OTHER
DIRECT REINSURANCE PACIFIC MARKETS TOTAL
------- ----------- ------- ------- -------
REVENUES:
Net premiums............................... $41,672 $5,130 $21,066 $ 287 $68,155
Investment income, net of related
expenses................................ 3,722 1,400 1,013 -- 6,135
Realized investment (losses)/gains, net.... -- -- -- -- --
Other revenue.............................. 36 1 -- -- 37
------- ------ ------- ------- -------
Total revenues.......................... 45,430 6,531 22,079 287 74,327
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits........... 39,492 3,122 11,641 170 54,425
Interest credited.......................... 27 -- -- -- 27
Policy acquisition costs and other
insurance expenses...................... 1,379 169 9,808 52 11,408
Other operating expenses................... 4,434 1,214 4,536 1,850 12,034
Interest expense........................... -- -- 484 -- 484
------- ------ ------- ------- -------
Total benefits and expenses............. 45,332 4,505 26,469 2,072 78,378
------- ------ ------- ------- -------
Income/(loss) before income taxes and
minority interest..................... $ 98 $2,026 $(4,390) $(1,785) $(4,051)
======= ====== ======= ======= =======
OTHER INTERNATIONAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS)
LATIN AMERICA
---------------------- ASIA OTHER
DIRECT REINSURANCE PACIFIC MARKETS TOTAL
------- ----------- ------- ------- -------
REVENUES:
Net premiums................................ $33,794 $12,292 $12,735 $ -- $58,821
Investment income, net of related
expenses................................. 2,050 986 (231) -- 2,805
Realized investment (losses)/gains, net..... -- -- -- -- --
Other revenue............................... (30) 1 -- -- (29)
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Total revenues........................... 35,814 13,279 12,504 -- 61,597
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits............ 30,654 8,024 9,096 -- 47,774
Interest credited........................... 5 -- -- -- 5
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses................................. 2,276 90 2,392 -- 4,758
Other operating expenses.................... 3,299 1,264 2,706 -- 7,269
Interest expense............................ -- -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Total benefits and expenses.............. 36,234 9,378 14,194 -- 59,806
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
(Loss)/income before income taxes and
minority interest...................... $ (420) $ 3,901 $(1,690) $ -- $ 1,791
======= ======= ======= ==== =======
17
20
ACCIDENT AND HEALTH
(IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- ------- -------
REVENUES:
Net premiums.............................................. $ 90,692 $57,182 $47,789
Investment income, net of related expenses................ 1,249 1,019 730
Realized investment gains/(losses), net................... 2 2 (2)
Other revenue............................................. 1,379 666 335
-------- ------- -------
Total revenues......................................... 93,322 58,869 48,852
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES:
Claims and other policy benefits.......................... 70,658 42,250 33,640
Accident and health pool charge........................... 18,000 -- --
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses..... 28,354 18,389 13,630
Other operating expenses.................................. 5,652 2,350 2,280
-------- ------- -------
Total benefits and expenses....................... 122,664 62,989 49,550
-------- ------- -------
(Loss) before income taxes and minority interest....... $(29,342) $(4,120) $ (698)
======== ======= =======
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest. Consolidated income
before income taxes and minority interest decreased 3.4% in 1997. Diluted
earnings per share were $2.13 for 1997 compared with $2.17 for 1996. After tax
consolidated net income before realized capital gains and losses decreased
slightly to $54.4 million in 1997 from $54.6 million in 1996. During the first
quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a charge of $18.0 million, $10.4 million
after-tax, to increase reserves associated with run-off claims from certain
accident and health insurance pools in which it had formerly participated. That
action was a result of management's strategic decision to exit all
outside-managed accident and health pools. The charge reflects management's
intent to reserve fully for all anticipated claim payments attributed to
outside-managed accident and health pools. Due to continuing losses emanating
from certain of the Company's accident and health operations in the third and
fourth quarters of 1997, the strategic decision was made to cease marketing
accident and health business and to place the operation into run-off at
year-end. The Company established an additional $3.0 million in reserves which
it believes are sufficient to handle the run-off. In December 1997, RGA
Reinsurance was notified by the holders of minority interests in its accident
and health subsidiaries of their intent to exercise certain put options for
their 49% ownership interest. Based upon the Company's decision to cease
marketing accident and health business, the Company also established a reserve
of approximately $3.0 million against the intangible asset that will arise
related to the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired when put options are exercised by certain minority interests.
The increase in the U.S. operations income before income taxes and minority
interest in 1997 compared to 1996 was due to fees earned on reinsurance
transactions and strong premium and investment income growth of 13.9% and 38.0%,
respectively. The increase in the Canadian operations income before income taxes
and minority interest in 1997 compared to 1996 was primarily a result of strong
new business production and recapture fees earned which were partially offset by
adverse mortality experienced in 1997. The other international operations lost
$8.2 million before income taxes and minority interest in 1997 compared to $4.1
million loss in 1996. The losses in the segment were due primarily to continued
price pressure in highly competitive international markets and adverse mortality
for blocks of mortality risk reinsurance from Argentina. Additionally, costs
associated with the development of new business in several international markets
still exceed the revenue base, due to the relatively recent initiation of market
development activities. The decrease in the accident and health operations
income before income taxes and minority interest in 1997 compared to 1996 was
primarily due to the accident and health charge in the first quarter, the write
off of intangibles and establishment of additional reserves in the fourth
quarter discussed above, as well as continued adverse experience on the
remainder of the business.
18
21
Net Premiums. Consolidated net premiums increased 23.8%, to $835.5 million
in 1997. Net premiums for the U.S. operations rose 13.9% in 1997. Renewal
premiums from the existing block of business, new business premiums from
facultative and automatic treaties, and premium flows from reinsurance of larger
blocks of in force business all contributed to the premium increase. Business
premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting
practices of ceding companies from period to period.
Net premiums in the Canadian operations increased 32.4% to $83.6 million in
1997. New business premiums increased $2.0 million, while renewal premiums
increased $18.4 million during 1997. The growth in renewal premiums reflects the
normal increase of in force business and the effect of large blocks of in force
business acquired in the fourth quarter of 1996 and retained during 1997. The
effect of changes in the foreign exchange rate during 1997 was not material.
The Company's other international operations reported premiums of $107.0
million in 1997 compared to $68.2 million in 1996. The 1997 premium represented
approximately $68.2 million from Latin America, of which approximately $56.5
million was direct premium generated in Argentina and Chile. This increase
resulted from continued growth in Chilean single premium annuities and universal
life business in Argentina. The Asia Pacific operations and other markets
generated $38.8 million of premiums, predominantly through the Hong Kong contact
office and Australia.
Accident and health operations net premiums increased 58.6% to $90.7
million in 1997. The net premiums increased primarily from business written by
the Company's domestic underwriting facility. With the decision to cease
marketing this type of business, it is anticipated that accident and health
premiums will decrease in each of the next few years. The Company estimates that
future accident and health premiums compared to 1997 premiums will remain level
in 1998. Premiums will decrease, compared to each preceding year, by
approximately 20%, 70%, 90%, and 100% during 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002,
respectively.
Net Investment Income. Consolidated net investment income increased 37.6%
in 1997. The cost basis of fixed maturity securities increased $946.7 million,
or 64.4%. The increase in invested assets was a result of an increase in
operating cash flows and reinsurance transactions involving deposits for
asset-intensive products from ceding companies, primarily stable value deposits,
of $834.3 million and $429.3 million during 1997 and 1996, respectively. The
average yield earned on investments was 7.23% in 1997 compared with 7.32% earned
in 1996. The decrease in overall yield reflected the increase in assets
supporting the stable value reinsurance product that are generally of a shorter
duration and carry a lower average yield. The asset-intensive products
investment portfolios generated approximately $55.6 million and $24.6 million of
investment income in 1997 and 1996, respectively, which was largely offset by
earnings credited and paid to ceding companies included in interest credited.
Realized Investment Gains/(Losses), Net. Consolidated net realized capital
gains decreased $0.6 million to $0.3 million in 1997. The 1997 amount included
the write down of the value of an investment by $2.5 million, which was more
than offset by capital gains within the various operating portfolios.
Other Revenue. Consolidated other revenue increased $30.0 million in 1997
to $47.4 million. Other revenue includes items such as treaty recapture fees,
profit and risk fees associated with financial reinsurance as well as earnings
in unconsolidated subsidiaries, management fee income and miscellaneous income
associated with late premium payments. During 1997, financial reinsurance
treaties resulted in $16.0 million in financial reinsurance fees which were
partially offset by fees paid to retrocessionaires of $14.4 million, included in
policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. The Company's strategy
involves the assumption and subsequent retrocession of these financial
reinsurance treaties which resulted in amounts of $147.2 and $148.4 being
included in other reinsurance assets and liabilities, respectively, on the
Company's consolidated balance sheets. Other revenue also included $9.3 million
in earnings in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the U.S. operations and a
recapture fee of $20.1 million for a treaty executed in the Canadian operations
during December 1997. This recapture fee included the recovery of acquisition
costs previously deferred which have been reflected in policy acquisition costs
and other insurance expenses.
Claims and Other Policy Benefits. Consolidated claims and other policy
benefits increased 26.6% in 1997. Claims and other policy benefits as a
percentage of net premiums increased to 76.6% in 1997 from 74.9% in
19
22
1996. This increase was primarily a result of adverse experience in the Canadian
and accident and health operations in 1997 and increasing levels of other
international business. The Company expects mortality to fluctuate somewhat from
period to period, but believes it is fairly constant over longer periods of
time. The Company continues to monitor mortality trends to determine the
appropriateness of reserve levels.
U.S. operations claims and other policy benefits increased 13.3% in 1997,
primarily as a result of increases from new business production. Claims and
other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums decreased slightly to
73.6% in 1997 from 74.0% in 1996. This decrease was due to normal short-term
fluctuations in death claims.
Canadian operations claims and other policy benefits increased 53.1% in
1997. Claims and other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums increased
to 89.7% in 1997 from 77.6% in 1996. The increase as a percent of premiums was
primarily due to mortality results which were not as favorable as those
experienced in 1996.
The Company's other international business comprised the remaining increase
of $32.1 million from the prior year. This increase was the result of reserve
and policyholder benefit increases on business from Latin American ventures and
blocks of mortality risk reinsurance of $20.9 million. These reserve increases
resulted from new business and the continued growth in the Latin American single
premium immediate annuity business in 1997. The Asia Pacific operations
reflected an increase of $9.5 million resulting primarily from new business
written in Australia.
Accident and health operations claims and other policy benefits increased
67.2% in 1997. These claims and other policy benefits do not include the $18.0
million, $10.4 million after-tax, accident and health pool charge taken during
the first quarter of 1997, which is separately disclosed on the income
statement. As a percentage of net premiums, claims and other policy benefits
increased to 77.9% in 1997 from 73.9% in 1996. The increase as a percent of
premiums was primarily due to an increase in reserves of approximately $3.0
million during 1997 related to the Company's decision to cease marketing these
services and place the line into run-off. In addition, the segment continued to
experience adverse results in 1997. The accident and health operations reserves
are subject to volatility due to the nature of risk covered, primarily accident
risks. Reserves are calculated based upon current information, including
industry estimates for certain aviation accidents.
Interest Credited. Consolidated interest credited increased $37.3 million
in 1997 to $92.0 million. Interest credited represents amounts credited on the
Company's asset-intensive and universal life type products. Asset-intensive
products include stable value operations, bank-owned life insurance and annuity
products. Reinsurance of these products is primarily written in the U.S.
operations, while the Canadian operations have a small annuity block of business
and the Latin American operations have a direct universal life product in
Argentina. The increase in interest credited was a result of an increase in
reinsurance transactions involving deposits for asset-intensive products from
ceding companies.
Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Insurance Expenses. Consolidated policy
acquisition costs and other insurance expenses, consisting primarily of
allowances, increased 29.3%, to $176.5 million in 1997. As a percentage of net
premiums, consolidated policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses
increased to 21.1% in 1997 from 20.2% in 1996 resulting from growth in financial
reinsurance transactions, partially offset by a change in business mix from
coinsurance to yearly renewable term reinsurance. Overall, policy acquisition
costs and other insurance expenses continue to fluctuate with business volume
and changes in product mix from period to period.
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of
net premiums for the U.S. operations decreased to 19.0% in 1997 from 19.8% in
1996. Within the U.S. operations, policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums for traditional business decreased
slightly to 16.2% in 1997 from 16.6% in 1996. The financial reinsurance business
within the U.S. operations reflects fees of approximately $14.4 million paid to
retrocessionaires during 1997, which represented a partial offset to the fees
collected that are reflected as other revenues.
20
23
In the Canadian operations, policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums increased to 26.8% in 1997, from 16.1%
in 1996. The increase was primarily a result of the recovery of deferred
acquisition costs of approximately $9.5 million through a treaty recapture in
December 1997 which partially offsets the gross recapture fee reported as other
revenue. In addition, an increased use of coinsurance versus yearly renewable
term reinsurance in 1997 compared to 1996 resulted in higher commissions as a
percent of net premiums for 1997 compared to 1996.
Other international operations policy acquisitions costs and other
insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums increased to 18.9% in 1997
from 16.7% in 1996. These percentages fluctuate due to the timing of client
company reporting and variations in the mixture of business being written within
the Latin American and Asia Pacific operations.
Accident and health operations policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums decreased to 31.3% in 1997 from 32.2%
in 1996. The decrease is not considered significant and will fluctuate resulting
from changes in the mixture of business within the accident and health
operations.
Other Operating Expenses. Consolidated other operating expenses increased
$13.2 million in 1997. The overall increase in operating expenses was attributed
to planned increases associated with the ongoing growth of the Company. Other
international operations operating expenses comprised $7.3 million of the
increase in 1997. The Company believes sustained growth in premiums will lessen
the burden of start-up expenses and expansion costs. In addition, $3.0 million
of the increase is associated with the write-off of intangibles associated with
the Company's decision to cease marketing accident and health operations.
Excluding the accident and health write-off, other operating expenses as a
percentage of total revenues decreased slightly to 4.7% in 1997 compared to 4.8%
in 1996.
Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense during 1997 related to the
Senior Notes issued in 1996, and the financing of a portion of the Company's
Australian reinsurance operations, RGA Australian Holdings PTY, Limited
("Australian Holdings"). Interest cost for 1997 and 1996 was $7.8 million and
$6.2 million, respectively. Interest related to the Senior Notes was $7.3
million in 1997 and $5.7 million in 1996.
Provision for Income Taxes. Consolidated income tax expense decreased 9.3%
in 1997 as a result of lower pre-tax income. Income tax expense from operations
before realized investment gains/(losses) and accident and health pool charge
represented approximately 35.8% and 36.3% of pre-tax income for 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The Company calculated a tax benefit of $7.6 million on the $18.0
million accident and health reserve adjustment recorded in the first quarter of
1997.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest. Consolidated income
before income taxes and minority interest increased 16.7% in 1996. Diluted
earnings per share were $2.17 for 1996 compared with $1.87 for 1995. After tax
consolidated net income before realized capital gains and losses increased
15.6%, to $54.6 million in 1996.
Income before income taxes and minority interest for the U.S. operations
increased to $84.5 million in 1996 due primarily to strong premium growth of
17.5% in 1996. Income before income taxes and minority interest for the Canadian
operations increased 23.5%, to $13.4 million in 1996, primarily as a result of
strong new business production and gains on investments. The other international
operations lost $4.1 million before income taxes and minority interest in 1996.
This represented approximately $2.1 million of income from Latin American
operations, offset by a loss of $4.4 million from Asia Pacific operations and
$1.8 million from other markets. The loss in the Asia Pacific operations and
other markets was attributable to the cost associated with the development of a
new operation, which more than offset the increasing premium levels during 1996.
The accident and health operations lost $4.1 million before income taxes and
minority interest in 1996 and $0.7 million in 1995. The loss in 1996 was the
result of several large claims incurred and strengthening reserves associated
with several closed blocks of business
Net Premiums. Consolidated net premiums increased 18.4%, to $674.9 million
in 1996. Net premiums for the U.S. operations rose 17.5% to $486.4 million in
1996. Renewal premiums from the existing block of
21
24
business, new business premiums from facultative and automatic treaties, and
premium flows from reinsurance of larger blocks of in force business all
contributed to the premium increase. Business premium levels are significantly
influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies
from period to period.
Net premiums in the Canadian operations increased 28.2% to $63.1 million in
1996. New business premiums increased $6.0 million, while renewal premiums
increased $7.8 million during 1996. The effect of changes in the foreign
exchange rate during 1996 was not material.
The Company's other international operations reported premiums of $68.2
million in 1996 compared to $58.8 million in 1995. The 1996 premium represented
approximately $46.8 million from Latin America, of which approximately $41.7
million was direct premium generated by business ventures in Argentina and
Chile. The remaining $21.4 million of premiums was reported from the Asia
Pacific operations and other markets, predominantly through the Hong Kong
contact office.
Accident and health operations net premiums increased 19.7% to $57.2
million in 1996. The net premiums reported from business in the United Kingdom
has more than offset premium losses incurred from cancellation of existing U.S.
treaties during 1996.
Net Investment Income. Consolidated net investment income increased 51.8%
in 1996. The cost basis of fixed maturity securities increased $650.0 million,
or 79.3%. The increase in invested assets resulted from an increase in operating
cash flows, net proceeds of $99.0 million from the 7 1/4% Senior Notes issued by
the Company during 1996, and reinsurance transactions involving deposits for
asset-intensive products from ceding companies, primarily stable value deposits,
of $429.3 million and $112.5 million during 1996 and the second half of 1995,
respectively. The average yield earned was 7.32% in 1996 compared with 7.63%
earned in 1995. The decrease in overall yield reflected the increase in assets
supporting the stable value reinsurance product that are of a shorter duration
and carry a lower average yield. The asset-intensive investment portfolio
generated $24.1 million of investment income in 1996, which was largely offset
by earnings credited and paid to ceding companies included in interest credited.
Realized Investment Gains/(Losses), Net. Consolidated net realized capital
gains increased $0.9 million to $0.9 million in 1996. This was primarily the
result of repositioning the Company's Canadian operating portfolio to achieve a
better duration match for the assets and liabilities.
Other Revenue. Consolidated other revenue increased $9.4 million in 1996 to
$17.4 million. Other revenue includes items such as recapture fees, profit and
risk fees associated with financial reinsurance as well as earnings in
unconsolidated subsidiaries, management fee income and miscellaneous income
associated with late premium payments. During 1996, financial reinsurance
treaties resulted in $14.7 million in financial reinsurance fees which were
partially offset by fees paid to retrocessionaires of $12.8 million, included in
policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. Other revenue also
included $2.2 million in earnings in unconsolidated subsidiaries. The Company's
strategy involves the assumption and subsequent retrocession of these financial
reinsurance treaties which resulted in $148.7 million and $137.0 million being
included in other reinsurance assets and liabilities, respectively, on the
Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1996.
Claims and Other Policy Benefits. Consolidated claims and other policy
benefits increased 17.6%, to $505.7 million in 1996. Consolidated claims and
other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums decreased slightly to
74.9% in 1996, from 75.5% in 1995. This decrease was primarily a result of
changes in the mix of business during 1996. The Company expects mortality to
fluctuate somewhat from period to period, but believes it is fairly constant
over longer periods of time. The Company continues to monitor mortality trends
to determine the appropriateness of reserve levels. This fluctuation is due to
normal short-term fluctuations in death claims.
U.S. operations claims and other policy benefits increased 15.4% in 1996.
However, claims and other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums
decreased to 74.0% in 1996 from 75.3% in 1995. This increase was due to normal
short-term fluctuations in death claims.
22
25
Canadian operations claims and other policy benefits increased 33.5% in
1996. Claims and other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums increased
to 77.6% in 1996 from 74.5% in 1995. The increase was primarily due to mortality
results which were not as favorable as those experienced in 1995.
The Company's other international operations claims and other policy
benefits increased $6.7 million in 1996. This increase was the result of reserve
and policyholder benefit increases on business from Latin American ventures and
blocks of mortality risk reinsurance of $3.9 million. These reserve increases
resulted from new business and the change in product mix in the Latin American
division to more single premium immediate annuity business in 1996. The Asia
Pacific operations reflected an increase of $2.5 million. This increase is the
result of new business written, partially offset by refinements in reserve
calculations.
Accident and health operations claims and other policy benefits increased
25.6% in 1996. As a percentage of net premiums, claims and other policy benefits
increased to 73.9% in 1996, from 70.4% in 1995. The increase was primarily due
to overall strengthening of claim liabilities on several closed blocks of
business. The accident and health operations reserves are subject to volatility
due to the nature of risk covered, primarily accident risks and reporting lags
which are normal for the industry. Reserves are calculated based upon current
information, including industry estimates for certain aviation accidents.
Interest Credited. Consolidated interest credited increased $20.9 million
in 1996 to $54.7 million. Interest credited represents amounts credited on the
Company's asset-intensive and universal life type products. Asset-intensive
products include stable value operations, bank-owned life insurance and annuity
products. Reinsurance on these products is primarily written in the U.S.
operations, while the Canadian operations have a small annuity block of business
and the Latin American operations have a direct universal life product in
Argentina. The increase in interest credited was a result of an increase in
reinsurance transactions involving deposits for asset-intensive products from
ceding companies.
Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Insurance Expenses. Consolidated policy
acquisition costs and other insurance expenses, consisting primarily of
allowances, increased 39.2%, to $136.5 million in 1996. As a percentage of net
premiums, policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses increased to
20.2% in 1996 from 17.2% in 1995 resulting from growth in financial reinsurance
transactions, partially offset by a change in business mix from coinsurance to
yearly renewable term reinsurance. Overall, policy acquisition costs and other
insurance expenses continue to fluctuate with business volume and changes in
product mix from period to period.
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of
net premiums for the U.S. operations increased to 19.8% in 1996 from 17.3% in
1995. Within the U.S. operations, policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums for traditional business increased
slightly to 16.6% in 1996 from 15.8% in 1995. The financial reinsurance business
within the U.S. operations reflects fees of approximately $12.8 million paid to
retrocessionaires, which represents an offset to the fees collected that are
reflected as other revenues.
In the Canadian operations, policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums decreased to 16.1% in 1996, from 16.4%
in 1995. The decrease was a result of several factors, including the mix of
business written during the past several years which continued to transition to
a yearly renewable term basis from a coinsurance basis. Business written on a
yearly renewable term basis has significantly lower commissions than business
written on a coinsurance basis.
Other international operations policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums increased to 16.7% in 1996 from 8.1% in
1995. These percentages fluctuate due to the timing of client company reporting
and the continuing refinement of deferred acquisition cost and policy benefit
reserve calculations.
Accident and health operations policy acquisition costs and other insurance
expenses as a percentage of net premiums increased to 32.2% in 1996 from 28.5%
in 1995. The increase was a result of a continued transition in the mix of
business during 1996. During 1996, a larger percentage of business continued to
be written on a quota share basis resulting in higher commissions.
23
26
Other Operating Expenses. Consolidated other operating expenses increased
$8.3 million in 1996. The overall increase in operating expenses was attributed
to planned increases associated with the ongoing growth of the Company, of which
other international operations operating expenses comprised $4.8 million of the
increase. Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues remained
relatively stable at 4.8% compared to 4.7% in 1995.
Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense during 1996 related to the
issuance of $100.0 million of Senior Notes by RGA on March 19, 1996, and the
financing of a portion of the Company's Australian reinsurance operations,
Australian Holdings. Interest cost for 1996 was $6.2 million with $5.7 million
related to Senior Notes.
Provision for Income Taxes. Consolidated income tax expense increased 16.7%
in 1996 as a result of higher pre-tax income. The Company's effective tax rate
was 36.4% for 1996 and 1995.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
RGA is a holding company which has as its principal assets interests in its
subsidiaries. RGA's liquidity, including the amount of dividends and interest
and principal payments that the Company can pay, will depend in part on the
operations of its reinsurance subsidiaries. The transfer of funds from the
subsidiaries to RGA is subject to applicable insurance laws and regulations. See
"Business -- Regulation -- Restrictions on Dividends and Distributions."
In 1996, RGA issued $100.0 million of 7 1/4% Senior Notes. Interest is
payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 with the principal amount due on
April 1, 2006. The net proceeds from the offering of approximately $98.9 million
have been utilized to finance the continuing development of the Company's
operations. Australian Holdings established a line of credit with an outstanding
balance at December 31, 1997 and 1996, of $7.8 million and $7.6 million,
respectively. The Company also has access to a $25.0 million line of credit.
RGA began repurchasing shares in the open market in May 1997, to enable RGA
to satisfy obligations under its stock option program. Purchases were made in
the open market from time to time, at the then prevailing market price, or
through negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 1997, 322,562 shares had
been repurchased since May 1997. RGA has not repurchased shares since December
31, 1997.
The sources of funds of RGA's operating subsidiaries consist of premiums
received from ceding insurers, investment income, and proceeds from sales and
redemption of investments. Premiums are generally received in advance of related
claims payments. Funds are applied primarily to policy claims and benefits,
operating expenses, income taxes, and investment purchases. As of December 31,
1997, RGA Reinsurance had statutory capital and surplus of $249.3 million. The
maximum amount available for payment of dividends in 1998 by RGA Reinsurance
under Missouri law, without the prior approval of the Missouri Director of
Insurance, is $24.9 million. RGA Canada's statutory capital was $64.5 million at
December 31, 1997. The maximum amount available for dividends by RGA Canada
under the Canadian Minimum Continuing Capital and Surplus Requirements ("MCCSR")
was $15.5 million at December 31, 1997. Dividend payments from other
subsidiaries and joint ventures are subject to regulations in the country of
domicile. The Company's ability to service debt and pay dividends is dependent
on operations and the receipt of dividends from subsidiaries.
The Company's net cash flows from consolidated operating activities for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, were $432.7 million, $256.7
million, and $171.0 million, respectively. Because the Company's traditional
reinsurance business provides positive cash flow, the Company's traditional
reinsurance liabilities generally are not subject to disintermediation risk, and
because the reinsured treaties offer no withdrawal options and require no return
of premium if canceled or allowed to lapse, the Company historically has had
more than sufficient funds to pay claims and expenses. The Company expects any
future increase in the need for liquidity due to relatively large policy loans
or unanticipated material claim levels would be met first by operating cash
flows and then by selling fixed-maturity securities or short-term investments.
The Company's asset-intensive products are primarily supported by
investments in fixed-maturity securities. Investment guidelines are established
to structure the investment portfolio based upon the type,
24
27
duration and behavior of products in the liability portfolio so as to achieve
targeted levels of profitability. The Company manages the asset-intensive
business to provide a targeted spread between the interest rate earned on
investments and the interest rate credited to underlying liabilities. The
Company periodically reviews models projecting different interest rate scenarios
and their impact on profitability.
Effective December 31, 1993, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners ("NAIC") adopted risk-based capital ("RBC") statutory requirements
for U.S.-based life insurance companies. These requirements measure statutory
capital and surplus needs based on the risks associated with a company's mix of
products and investment portfolio. In December 1992, guidelines on MCCSR became
effective for Canadian insurance companies. These guidelines prescribe surplus
requirements and take into account both assets and liabilities in establishing
solvency margins. At December 31, 1997, statutory capital and surplus of RGA
Reinsurance significantly exceeded all RBC thresholds and RGA Canada's capital
levels significantly exceeded any MCCSR requirements. All of the Company's
insurance operating subsidiaries exceed the minimum capital requirements in
their respective jurisdictions as of December 31, 1997. See "Business --
Regulation."
INVESTMENTS
All investments made by RGA and its subsidiaries conform to the qualitative
and quantitative limits prescribed by the applicable jurisdiction's insurance
laws and regulations. All investment portfolios are reviewed by the Board of
Directors of RGA. In addition, the investment portfolios of the international
subsidiaries are periodically reviewed by their respective Boards of Directors.
The Company's investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly
investment-grade, fixed-maturity portfolio, to provide adequate liquidity for
expected reinsurance obligations, and to maximize total return through prudent
asset management. The Company's asset/liability duration matching differs
between U.S. and Canadian operating segments. The target duration for the U.S.
investments is currently a range between four and seven years, with individual
investments all along the maturity spectrum. Based on Canadian reserve
requirements, a portion of the Canadian liabilities is strictly matched with
long duration Canadian assets, with the remaining assets invested to maximize
the total rate of return, given the characteristics of the corresponding
liabilities and Company liquidity needs. For the year ended December 31, 1997,
the Company's earned yield on fixed-maturity securities was 7.23%.
The Company's fixed-maturity securities are invested primarily in U.S.
Treasuries, Canadian government securities, public and private corporate bonds,
and mortgage and asset-backed securities. As of December 31, 1997, more than 98%
of the Company's consolidated investment portfolio of fixed maturity securities
was investment-grade. Important factors in the selection of investments include
diversification, quality, yield, total rate of return potential, and call
protection. The relative importance of these factors is determined by market
conditions and the underlying product or portfolio characteristics. Cash
equivalents are invested in high-grade money market instruments.
Private placement bonds are issued in negotiated transactions between
lenders and borrowers and are not registered with the Commission. While less
liquid than public securities, private placements often contain investment
characteristics favorable to investors, including more stringent financial
covenants, additional call protection, and higher yields than similar public
securities.
The largest asset class in which fixed maturities were invested was
mortgage-backed securities, which represented 24.4% of total invested assets as
of December 31, 1997. Approximately 58% of these securities were invested in the
investment portfolio supporting stable value reinsurance. Investors are
compensated primarily for reinvestment risk rather than credit quality risk. To
mitigate prepayment volatility, the Company primarily invests in senior,
intermediate, average-life tranches of agency and whole loan collateralized
mortgage obligations. All of the Company's mortgage-backed securities are
investment-grade, with an average S&P rating of AA as of December 31, 1997.
As of December 31, 1997, mortgage loans represented approximately 4.6% of
the Company's invested assets, which consisted of approximately $91.8 million in
U.S. mortgages and $73.7 million in Chilean mortgage-related instruments,
including real estate leasing, mortgage drafts, and mortgage loans. The
25
28
Company invests primarily in mortgages on commercial offices and retail
locations. The Company's domestic mortgage loans generally range in size from
$0.3 million to $7.3 million, with the average mortgage loan investment as of
December 31, 1997, being approximately $3.0 million. The Company's Chilean
mortgage instruments are generally less than $1.0 million, with the average less
than $100,000. The mortgage loan portfolio is diversified by geographic region
and property type as discussed further in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements incorporated by reference in this Prospectus.
As of December 31, 1997, 13.2% of the Company's invested assets consisted
of policy loans. These policy loans present no credit risk because the amount of
the loan cannot exceed the obligation due the ceding company upon the death of
the insured or surrender of the underlying policy. The policy loan interest
rates are determined by the provisions of the treaties in force and the
underlying policies. Because policy loans represent premature distributions of
policy liabilities, they have the effect of reducing future disintermediation
risk. In addition, the Company earns a spread between the interest rate earned
on policy loans and the interest rate credited to corresponding liabilities.
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to improve the
management of the investment related risks. The Company uses both
exchange-traded and customized, over-the-counter derivative financial
instruments. RGA Reinsurance has established minimum credit quality standards
for counterparties and seeks to obtain collateral or other credit supports. The
Company limits its total financial exposure to counterparties. The Company's use
of exchange-traded and customized, over-the-counter derivative financial
instruments is currently not significant.
The invested assets of RGA, RGA Reinsurance, RGA Reinsurance Company
(Barbados) Ltd. ("RGA Barbados"), Australian Holdings, and RGA Canada are
managed by Conning Asset Management Company, an indirect subsidiary of Conning
Corporation which is an indirect majority owned subsidiary of General American.
The investments of BHIF America Seguros de Vida, S.A. ("BHIF America"), RGA
Reinsurance Company Chile, S.A. ("RGA Chile"), General American Argentina
Seguros de Vida, S.A. (formerly Manantial Seguros de Vida, S.A.) ("Manantial"),
and RGA Holdings Limited (U.K.) ("RGA UK") were managed by the staffs of those
entities.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXPOSURE
The Company is subject to foreign currency translation, transaction, and
net income exposure. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency
translation exposure related to its investment in foreign subsidiaries as it
views these investments to be long-term. Translation differences resulting from
translating foreign subsidiary balances to U.S. dollars are reflected in equity.
The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency exposure of its
subsidiaries transacting business in currencies other than their functional
currency (transaction exposure). Currently, the Company believes its foreign
currency transaction exposure is not material to the consolidated results of
operations. Net income exposure which may result from the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar to foreign currencies will adversely affect results of operations
since the income earned in the foreign currencies is worth less in U.S. dollars.
When evaluating investments in foreign countries, the Company considers the
stability of the political and currency environment. Devaluation of the currency
after an investment decision has been made will affect the value of the
investment when translated to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes.
INFLATION
The primary, direct effect on the Company of inflation is the increase in
operating expenses. A large portion of the Company's operating expenses consists
of salaries, which are subject to wage increases at least partly affected by the
rate of inflation. The rate of inflation also has an indirect effect on the
Company. To the extent that a government's policies to control the level of
inflation result in changes in interest rates, the Company's investment income
is affected.
26
29
YEAR 2000
Many of the Company's data processing systems require modifications to
enable them to process dates including the year 2000 and beyond. The Company has
established a plan to address the Year 2000 issue and that work is progressing
on schedule. It is anticipated that testing and resolution will be completed
according to the Company's plan. During the years of 1998 and 1999, the Company
expects to direct certain internal and external resources to the Year 2000
effort. The Company does not believe the net effect of these efforts will
materially affect the Company's consolidated financial statements during the
1998 and 1999 period. The Company also relies on information from external
parties such as ceding companies and retrocessionaires. The Company could be
adversely affected by those companies' compliance with the Year 2000 issue over
which the Company has no direct control. The Company is currently working with
its clients to identify their Year 2000 compliance positions and will follow-up
with clients on potential interface problems.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 130,
"Reporting Comprehensive Income," effective for years beginning after December
31, 1997. SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components (revenues, expenses, gains and losses)
in a full set of general purpose financial statements. The Company anticipates
that the most significant items of comprehensive income will be the change in
unrealized gains and losses on securities, as well as the change in foreign
currency translation, both of which items historically have been reported as a
component of stockholders' equity. The adoption of SFAS No. 130 will not affect
the Company's results of operation or financial position, but will affect their
presentation and disclosures.
Also in June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS
No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,"
effective years beginning after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 131 requires that a
public company report financial and descriptive information about its reportable
operating segments pursuant to criteria that differ from current accounting
practice. Operating segments, as defined, are components of an enterprise about
which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 will not affect the
Company's results of operations or financial position, but will affect the
disclosure of segment information.
27
30
BUSINESS
The following sets forth certain selected information from Item 1
"Business" contained in RGA's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997, which is incorporated by reference in this Prospectus.
Investors are encouraged to review such Form 10-K for additional information
regarding the Company.
GENERAL
RGA, through its operating subsidiaries, is one of the largest life
reinsurers in North America. At December 31, 1997, the Company had assets of
$4.7 billion, stockholders' equity of $499.3 million and reinsurance in force of
$227.3 billion. The Company's core North American life reinsurance business
serves as the platform for its business strategy of further expansion into
selected domestic and international markets. Over the past five years, the
Company has produced a strong and consistent record of growth and profitability,
with revenue and net income (excluding the accident and health pool charge in
1997) growing at compound annual rates of approximately 24% and 18%,
respectively.
The Company's approach to the North American market, which represented 76%
of net premiums in 1997, has been to (i) focus on large, high quality life
insurers as clients, (ii) provide superior facultative underwriting and
competitive automatic reinsurance capacity, and (iii) deliver responsive and
flexible service to its clients. Management believes it is the largest
facultative life reinsurer in North America. The Company conducted business with
80 of the 100 largest U.S. and 35 of the 40 largest Canadian life insurance
companies in 1997, with no one client representing more than 7% of consolidated
gross premiums.
The Company has also developed its capacity and expertise in
non-traditional reinsurance, which includes asset-intensive products and
financial reinsurance. In 1997, the Company's North American non-traditional
reinsurance business earned $12.8 million or 13% of income before income taxes
and minority interest (excluding the accident and health pool charge). The
Company's non-traditional business currently includes reinsurance of stable
value products, bank-owned life insurance and annuities.
The Company leverages its underwriting expertise and industry knowledge as
it expands into selected international markets. Its operations outside North
America currently include direct and reinsurance business from joint ventures
and subsidiaries in Latin America, Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom,
as well as reinsurance of life products and related coverages offered
principally in Hong Kong and Japan through RGA Reinsurance.
RGA Reinsurance has an "AA" claims paying rating from S&P and an "A+"
claims paying rating from A.M. Best. The S&P and A.M. Best claims paying ratings
are based upon an insurance company's ability to pay policyholder obligations
and are not directed toward the protection of investors. In addition, RGA has an
"A" long-term debt rating from S&P.
During 1997, the Company made a strategic decision to cease marketing
accident and health reinsurance and to place its existing portfolio into runoff.
While this business contributed approximately 11% of reinsurance premiums for
1997, the Company does not expect the termination of this business to materially
affect future results. Management intends to redirect its focus to its core
North American and emerging businesses.
The Company believes that the following trends in the insurance industry
are increasing the demand for life reinsurance.
- INCREASED CAPITAL SENSITIVITY. Regulatory environment and competitive
business pressures are causing life insurers to reinsure as a means to
(i) manage risk-based capital by shifting mortality and other risks and
distribution costs to reinsurers, (ii) release capital to pursue new
businesses, and (iii) unlock the capital supporting, and value embedded
in, non-core product lines.
- CONSOLIDATION AND REORGANIZATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRY. The number of
merger and acquisition transactions within the U.S. life insurance
industry increased to 136 in 1997, from 63 in 1993. Management believes
that U.S. reorganizations of life insurers (such as demutualizations) and
international consolidation will continue to increase. As reinsurance
products are increasingly used to
28
31
finance these transactions and manage risk, demand for the Company's products is
expected to increase.
- CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS OF INSURED POPULATIONS. The aging of the population
in North America is increasing demand for financial products among "baby
boomers" who are concerned about protecting their peak income stream and
are considering retirement and estate planning. This trend is likely to
result in increased demand for annuity products and life insurance
policies, larger face amounts of life insurance policies and higher
mortality risk taken by life insurers, all of which should cause such
insurers to seek reinsurance products.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company continues to follow its two-part business strategy to
capitalize on industry trends and to achieve its goal of producing consistent
revenue and earnings growth.
- CONTINUE GROWTH OF CORE NORTH AMERICAN BUSINESS. The Company's strategy
includes continuing to grow each of the following components of its North
American operations:
-- FACULTATIVE REINSURANCE. The Company intends to maintain its leading
position as a facultative underwriter in North America by emphasizing
its high underwriting standards, prompt response on quotes,
competitive pricing, capacity and flexibility in meeting customer
needs.
-- AUTOMATIC REINSURANCE. The Company intends to expand its already
significant presence in the North American automatic reinsurance
market by using its recognized mortality expertise and breadth of
products and services to gain additional market share.
-- IN FORCE BLOCK REINSURANCE. The Company anticipates increased
opportunities to grow its business of reinsuring "in force block"
insurance, as insurers seek to exit various non-core businesses and
increase financial flexibility in order to, among other things,
redeploy capital and pursue merger and acquisition activity.
- CONTINUE EXPANSION INTO SELECTED MARKETS. The Company's strategy includes
building upon the expertise and relationships developed from its core
North American business platform to continue its expansion into selected
markets, including:
-- NON-TRADITIONAL REINSURANCE. The Company intends to continue
leveraging its existing client relationships and reinsurance
expertise to create customized non-traditional reinsurance products
and solutions. Industry trends, particularly the increased pace of
consolidation and reorganization among life insurance companies and
changes in product distribution, are expected to create significant
growth opportunities for non-traditional reinsurance.
-- OTHER INTERNATIONAL. Management believes that international markets
offer substantial opportunities for growth, and has capitalized on
this opportunity by establishing a presence in selected markets. The
Company often uses its reinsurance expertise, facultative
underwriting abilities and market knowledge as it continues to enter
mature and emerging insurance markets.
REINSURANCE OVERVIEW
Reinsurance is an arrangement under which an insurance company, the
"reinsurer," agrees to indemnify another insurance company, the "ceding
company," for all or a portion of the insurance risks underwritten by the ceding
company. Reinsurance is designed to (i) reduce the net liability on individual
risks, thereby enabling the ceding company to increase the volume of business it
can underwrite, as well as increase the maximum risk it can underwrite on a
single life or risk, (ii) stabilize operating results by leveling fluctuations
in the ceding company's loss experience, (iii) assist the ceding company to meet
applicable regulatory requirements, and (iv) enhance the ceding company's
financial strength and surplus position.
Life reinsurance primarily refers to reinsurance of individual term life
insurance policies, whole life insurance policies, universal life insurance
policies, and joint and survivor insurance policies. Ceding
29
32
companies typically contract with more than one company to reinsure their
business. Reinsurance may be written on an indemnity or an assumption basis.
Indemnity reinsurance does not discharge a ceding company from liability to the
policyholder; a ceding company is required to pay the full amount of its
insurance obligations regardless of whether it is entitled or able to receive
payments from its reinsurers. In the case of assumption reinsurance, the ceding
company is discharged from liability to the policyholder, with such liability
passed to the reinsurer. Reinsurers also may purchase reinsurance, known as
retrocession reinsurance, to cover their own risk exposure. Reinsurance
companies enter into retrocession agreements for reasons similar to those that
cause primary insurers to purchase reinsurance.
Reinsurance may be written on a facultative basis or an automatic treaty
basis. Facultative reinsurance is individually underwritten by the reinsurer for
each policy to be reinsured, with the pricing and other terms established at the
time the policy is underwritten based upon rates negotiated in advance.
Facultative reinsurance normally is purchased by insurance companies for
medically impaired lives, unusual risks, or liabilities in excess of binding
limits on their automatic treaties.
An automatic reinsurance treaty provides that the ceding company will cede
risks to a reinsurer on specified blocks of business where the underlying
policies meet the ceding company's underwriting criteria. In contrast to
facultative reinsurance, the reinsurer does not approve each individual risk.
Automatic reinsurance treaties generally provide that the reinsurer will be
liable for a portion of the risk associated with the specified policies written
by the ceding company. Automatic reinsurance treaties specify the ceding
company's binding limit, which is the maximum amount of risk on a given life
that can be ceded automatically and that the reinsurer must accept. The binding
limit may be stated either as a multiple of the ceding company's retention or as
a stated dollar amount.
Facultative and automatic reinsurance may be written as yearly renewable
term, coinsurance, or modified coinsurance, which vary with the type of risk
assumed and the manner of pricing the reinsurance. Under a yearly renewable term
treaty, the reinsurer assumes only the mortality or morbidity risk. Under a
coinsurance arrangement, depending upon the terms of the contract, the reinsurer
may share in the risk of loss due to mortality or morbidity, lapses, and the
investment risk, if any, inherent in the underlying policy. Modified coinsurance
differs from coinsurance only in that the assets supporting the reserves are
retained by the ceding company while the risk is transferred to the reinsurer.
Generally, the amount of life reinsurance ceded under facultative and
automatic reinsurance agreements is stated on either an excess or a quota share
basis. Reinsurance on an excess basis covers amounts in excess of an agreed-upon
retention limit. Retention limits vary by ceding company and also vary by age
and underwriting classification of the insured, product, and other factors.
Under quota share reinsurance, the ceding company states its retention in terms
of a fixed percentage of the risk that will be retained, with the remainder up
to the maximum binding limit to be ceded to one or more reinsurers.
Reinsurance agreements, whether facultative or automatic, may provide for
recapture rights on the part of the ceding company. Recapture rights permit the
ceding company to reassume all or a portion of the risk formerly ceded to the
reinsurer after an agreed-upon period of time (generally 10 years), subject to
certain other conditions. Recapture of business previously ceded does not affect
premiums ceded prior to the recapture of such business.
The potential adverse effects of recapture rights are mitigated by the
following factors: (i) recapture rights vary by treaty and the risk of recapture
is a factor which is taken into account when pricing a reinsurance agreement;
(ii) ceding companies generally may exercise their recapture rights only to the
extent they have increased their retention limits for the reinsured policies;
and (iii) ceding companies generally must recapture all of the policies eligible
for recapture under the agreement in a particular year if any are recaptured,
which prevents a ceding company from recapturing only the most profitable
policies. In addition, when a ceding company increases its retention and
recaptures reinsured policies, the reserves maintained by the reinsurer to
support the recaptured portion of the policies are released by the reinsurer.
30
33
RATINGS
The ability of RGA Reinsurance to write reinsurance for its own account
will depend on its financial condition and its ratings. A.M. Best, an
independent insurance company rating organization, has rated RGA Reinsurance
"A+." A.M. Best's ratings are based upon an insurance company's ability to pay
policyholder obligations and are not directed toward the protection of
investors. A.M. Best's ratings for insurance companies currently range from
"A++" to "F," and some companies are not rated. Publications of A.M. Best
indicate that "A+" and "A++" ratings are assigned to those companies which, in
A.M. Best's opinion, have achieved superior overall performance when compared to
the standards established by A.M. Best and generally have demonstrated a strong
ability to meet their policyholder obligations over a long period of time. In
evaluating a company's financial strength and operating performance, A.M. Best
reviews the company's profitability, leverage, and liquidity as well as its
spread of risk, the quality and appropriateness of its reinsurance program, the
quality and diversification of its assets, the adequacy of its policy or loss
reserves, the adequacy of its surplus, its capital structure, management's
experience and objectives, and policyholders' confidence.
Additionally, RGA Reinsurance has received an "AA" rating from S&P and an
"A1" rating from Moody's Investor Services ("Moody's") for claims-paying
ability. These ratings are based upon an insurance company's ability to pay
policyholder obligations and are not directed toward the protection of
investors, and represent S&P's third highest rating and Moody's fifth highest
rating. RGA has an "A" long-term debt rating from S&P and "A3" long term debt
rating from Moody's.
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
RGA is a holding company, the principal assets of which consist of the
common stock of RGA Reinsurance and RGA International Ltd., formerly G.A.
Canadian Holdings, Ltd. ("RGA International"), as well as investments in several
other subsidiaries or joint ventures. The primary source of funds for RGA to
make dividend distributions is dividends paid to RGA by RGA Reinsurance and RGA
International, securities maintained in its investment portfolio, and its
ability to raise additional capital. RGA Reinsurance's principal source of funds
is derived from current operations. RGA International's principal source of
funds is dividends on its equity interest in RGA Canada Management Company, Ltd.
("RGA Canada Management"), whose principal source of funds is dividends paid by
RGA Canada. RGA Canada's principal source of funds is derived from current
operations.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
The Company's reinsurance and insurance operations are classified into four
main operational segments: U.S., Canadian, other international and accident and
health. The U.S. operations provide life reinsurance and non-traditional
reinsurance to domestic clients. The Canadian operations provide insurers with
traditional reinsurance as well as assistance with capital management activity.
Other international business includes direct and reinsurance business from a
joint venture and subsidiaries in Latin America, Australia, and the United
Kingdom, as well as reinsurance of life and health products through RGA
Reinsurance. Of the other international segment, 52.8% of 1997 net premiums
related to direct insurance. The accident and health operations include both
domestic and international reinsurance.
31
34
The following tables set forth selected information concerning assumed
reinsurance business in force and new business volume for the Company's U.S.,
Canadian and other international segments for the indicated periods. The term
"in force" refers to face amounts or net amounts at risk and is not applicable
to the accident and health segment and the term "volume" refers to face amounts
or net amounts at risk and is not applicable to the accident and health segment.
Reinsurance business in force reflects the addition or acquisition of new
reinsurance business, offset by terminations (e.g., voluntary surrenders of
underlying life insurance policies, lapses of underlying policies, deaths of
insureds, the exercise of recapture options, changes in foreign exchange, and
any other changes in the amount of insurance in force). As a result of
terminations, assumed in force amounts at risk of $16.9 billion, $23.5 billion,
and $24.5 billion were released in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
REINSURANCE BUSINESS IN FORCE BY SEGMENT
(IN BILLIONS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------------- --------------- ---------------
AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
U.S. operations................................ $171.7 75.5 $137.3 81.6 $127.9 83.1
Canadian operations............................ 27.7 12.2 22.7 13.4 17.3 11.2
Other international operations................. 27.9 12.3 8.3 5.0 8.7 5.7
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
Total.......................................... $227.3 100.0 $168.3 100.0 $153.9 100.0
====== ===== ====== ===== ====== =====
NEW BUSINESS VOLUME BY SEGMENT
(IN BILLIONS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------------- --------------- ---------------
AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
U.S. operations................................ $50.2 66.1 $27.0 71.2 $27.7 76.9
Canadian operations............................ 8.0 10.5 6.9 18.2 4.2 11.7
Other international operations................. 17.7 23.4 4.0 10.6 4.1 11.4
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total.......................................... $75.9 100.0 $37.9 100.0 $36.0 100.0
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
32
35
The following table provides certain summary information regarding the
Company's industry segments for the periods indicated:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
U.S. operations:
Net premiums........................................... $ 554,253 $ 486,431 $ 414,133
Total revenues......................................... 734,825 613,285 496,156
Income before income taxes and minority interest....... 109,759 84,492 63,427
Total assets........................................... 3,730,158 2,250,654 1,559,811
Canadian operations:
Net premiums........................................... $ 83,563 $ 63,118 $ 49,248
Total revenues......................................... 120,145 78,549 60,315
Income before income taxes and minority interest....... 15,082 13,436 10,880
Total assets........................................... 580,599 321,314 247,432
Other international operations:
Net premiums........................................... $ 106,951 $ 68,155 $ 58,821
Total revenues......................................... 118,358 74,327 61,597
Income/(Loss) before income taxes and minority
interest............................................ (8,177) (4,051) 1,791
Total assets........................................... 267,606 170,656 103,590
Accident and health operations:
Net premiums........................................... $ 90,692 $ 57,182 $ 47,789
Total revenues......................................... 93,322 58,869 48,852
(Loss) before income taxes and minority interest....... (29,342) (4,120) (698)
Total assets........................................... 84,839 48,818 53,656
U.S. OPERATIONS
Traditional Business. The Company's U.S. life reinsurance business, which
totaled 66.3%, 72.1%, and 72.7%, of the Company's net premiums in 1997, 1996,
and 1995, respectively, consists of the reinsurance of various types of life
insurance products. This business has been accepted under many different rate
scales, with rates often tailored to suit the underlying product and the needs
of the ceding company. Premiums typically vary for smokers and non-smokers,
males and females, and may include a preferred underwriting class discount.
Regardless of the premium mode for the underlying primary insurance, reinsurance
premiums are generally paid annually. This business is made up of facultative
and automatic treaty business.
In addition, several of the Company's U.S. clients have purchased life
insurance policies insuring the lives of their executives. These policies have
generally been issued to fund deferred compensation plans and have been
reinsured with the Company. As of December 31, 1997, reinsurance of such
policies was reflected in interest sensitive contract reserves of approximately
$775.5 million and policy loans of $480.2 million.
Facultative Business. The U.S. facultative reinsurance operation involves
the assessment of the risks inherent in (i) multiple impairments, such as heart
disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes; (ii) cases involving large policy
face amounts; and (iii) financial risk cases, i.e., cases involving policies
disproportionately large in relation to the financial characteristics of the
proposed insured. The U.S. operations marketing efforts have focused on
developing facultative relationships with client companies because management
believes facultative reinsurance represents a substantial segment of the
reinsurance activity of many large insurance companies and has been an effective
means of expanding the U.S. operations automatic business. In 1997, 1996, and
1995, approximately 39.6%, 39.2%, and 38.3% respectively, of the U.S. gross
premiums were written on a facultative basis. The U.S. operations have
emphasized personalized service and prompt response to requests for facultative
risk assessment.
Only a portion of approved facultative applications result in paid
reinsurance. This is because applicants for impaired risk policies often submit
applications to several primary insurers, which in turn seek facultative
33
36
reinsurance from several reinsurers; ultimately, only one insurance company and
one reinsurer are likely to obtain the business. The U.S. operations track the
percentage of declined and placed facultative applications on a client-by-client
basis and generally work with clients to seek to maintain such percentages at
levels the U.S. operations deem acceptable.
Mortality studies by RGA Reinsurance have shown that the U.S. operations'
facultative mortality experience is comparable to its automatic mortality
experience relative to expected mortality rates. Because the U.S. operations
apply its underwriting standards to each application submitted to it
facultatively, the U.S. operations generally do not require ceding companies to
retain any portion of the underlying risk when business is written on a
facultative basis.
Automatic Business. Automatic business, including financial reinsurance
treaties, is generated pursuant to treaties which generally require that the
underlying policies meet the ceding company's underwriting criteria, although a
number of such policies may be rated substandard. In contrast to facultative
reinsurance, reinsurers do not engage in underwriting assessments of the risks
assumed through an automatic treaty. Automatic business tends to be very
price-competitive; however, clients are likely to give favorable consideration
to their existing reinsurers.
Because RGA Reinsurance does not apply its underwriting standards to each
policy ceded to it under automatic treaties, the U.S. operations generally
require ceding companies to keep their full retention when business is written
on an automatic basis, thereby increasing the ceding companies' incentives to
underwrite risks with due care and, when appropriate, to contest claims
diligently.
Non-Traditional Business. The Company also provides non-traditional
reinsurance of asset-intensive products and financial reinsurance.
Asset-intensive business includes the reinsurance of stable value products,
bank-owned life insurance, and annuities. The budget proposal recently submitted
to Congress by the Clinton Administration includes certain provisions which, if
enacted in the form proposed, would increase taxes on the owners of certain
corporate-owned and bank-owned life insurance. If these or similar proposed tax
changes were enacted into law, they could adversely affect the Company; however,
the Company does not consider the reinsurance of such policies to be a material
part of its business. The Company earns investment income on the deposits
underlying the asset-intensive products which is largely offset by earnings
credited and paid to the ceding companies. Financial reinsurance assists ceding
companies in meeting applicable regulatory requirements and enhances ceding
companies' financial strength and regulatory surplus position. The Company
provides ceding companies financial reinsurance by committing cash or assuming
insurance liabilities. Generally, such amounts are offset by receivables from
ceding companies which are supported by the future profits from the reinsured
block of business. The Company earns a return based on the amount of outstanding
reinsurance.
Customer Base. The U.S. reinsurance operation markets life reinsurance
primarily to the largest U.S. life insurance companies and currently has
treaties with most of the top 100 companies. These treaties generally are
terminable by either party on 90 days written notice, but only with respect to
future new business; existing business generally is not terminable, unless the
underlying policies terminate or are recaptured. In 1997, 32 clients had annual
gross premiums of $5 million or more and the aggregate gross premiums from these
clients represented approximately 76.7% of 1997 U.S. life gross premiums.
In 1997, no U.S. client accounted for more than 10% of the Company's
consolidated gross premiums. One client, however, accounted for more than 10% of
the Company's U.S. operations gross premiums. Also, three clients ceded more
than 5% of U.S. life gross premiums. Together they ceded $167.7 million, or
24.4%, of U.S. operations gross premiums in 1997.
During 1997, $243.9 million of U.S. operations net premium related to
facultative business. The U.S. life operations accepted new facultative business
from over 100 U.S. clients in 1997, and has been receiving facultative business
from most of these clients for an average of 10 years.
Risk Management. Prior to January 1, 1996, RGA Reinsurance's practice was
to retain up to $2 million of liability on any one life for all life
reinsurance. Effective January 1, 1996, RGA Reinsurance increased this retention
limit to up to $2.5 million. RGA Reinsurance has a number of retrocession
arrangements whereby
34
37
certain business in force is retroceded on a quota share or facultative basis.
All of the U.S. retrocessionaires under such arrangements were rated "A-" or
better by A.M. Best as of December 31, 1996. RGA Reinsurance also retrocedes
business to foreign reinsurers. In these instances, additional security in the
form of letters of credit or trust assets have been given by such
retrocessionaires as additional security in favor of RGA Reinsurance. The
Company also retrocedes most of its financial reinsurance business to other
insurance companies to alleviate the strain on statutory surplus created by this
business.
RGA Reinsurance has never experienced a default in connection with its
retrocession arrangements, nor has it experienced any difficulty in collecting
claims recoverable from its retrocessionaires; however, no assurance can be
given as to the future performance of such retrocessionaires or as to
recoverability of any such claims.
RGA Reinsurance has catastrophe insurance coverage issued by an insurer
rated "A" by A.M. Best that provides benefits of up to $100 million per
occurrence for claims involving three or more deaths in a single accident, with
a deductible of $1.5 million per occurrence. This coverage is terminable
annually on 90 days notice and is ultimately provided through a pool of
seventeen unaffiliated insurers. The Company believes such catastrophe insurance
coverage is adequate to protect the Company from the risks of multiple deaths of
lives reinsured by policies with RGA Reinsurance in a single accident. Several
large corporate plans reinsured by RGA Reinsurance cover aggregate amounts
substantially in excess of these limits, however.
Operations. During 1997, substantially all gross U.S. life business was
obtained directly, rather than through brokers. The U.S. operations have an
experienced marketing staff which works to maintain existing relationships and
to provide responsive service.
The U.S. operations auditing and accounting department is responsible for
treaty compliance auditing, financial analysis of results, generation of
internal management reports, and periodic audits of administrative practices and
records. A significant effort is focused on periodic audits of administrative
and underwriting practices, records, and treaty compliance of reinsurance
clients.
The U.S. operations claims department (i) reviews and verifies reinsurance
claims, (ii) obtains the information necessary to evaluate claims, (iii)
determines the Company's liability with respect to claims, and (iv) arranges for
timely claims payments. Claims are subjected to a detailed review process to
ensure that the risk was properly ceded, the claim complies with the contract
provisions, and the ceding company is current in the payment of reinsurance
premiums to the U.S. life operation. The claims department also investigates
claims generally for evidence of misrepresentation in the policy application and
approval process. In addition, the claims department monitors both specific
claims and the overall claims handling procedure of ceding companies.
Claims personnel work closely with their counterparts at client companies
to attempt to uncover fraud, misrepresentation, suicide, and other situations
where the claim can be reduced or eliminated. By law, the ceding company cannot
contest claims made after two years of the issuance of the underlying insurance
policy. By developing good working relationships with the claims departments of
client companies, major claims or problem claims can be addressed early in the
investigation process. Claims personnel review material claims presented to RGA
Reinsurance in detail to find potential mistakes such as claims ceded to the
wrong reinsurer and claims submitted for improper amounts.
CANADIAN OPERATIONS
Canadian life reinsurance business represented 10.0%, 9.4%, and 8.6%, of
RGA's net premiums in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. In 1997, the Canadian
life operations wrote $8.0 billion in new business. Approximately 85% of the
1997 Canadian new business was written on an automatic basis. During 1997, the
Canadian operations began supporting preferred underwriting products, added
creditor business, and began offering reinsurance of critical illness coverage.
These new products and continued growth in traditional reinsurance have
contributed to the overall increase in business.
Clients include virtually all of Canada's principal life insurers with no
single client representing more than 10% of the Company's consolidated net
premium in 1997 and the two largest clients representing less than 5%
35
38
of consolidated gross premiums. The Canadian life operations compete with a
small number of individual and group life reinsurers. The Canadian life
operations compete primarily on the basis of price, service, and financial
strength.
RGA Canada's policy is to retain up to C$100,000 of individual life and up
to C$100,000 of Accidental Death and Dismemberment liability on any one life.
RGA Canada retrocedes amounts in excess of its retention mostly to RGA
Reinsurance through General American in accordance with certain retrocession
agreements which are described under Item 1 "Business -- Corporate
Structure -- Historical Review" in RGA's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated by reference in this Prospectus.
Retrocessions are arranged through RGA Reinsurance's retrocession pool. RGA
Canada has never experienced a default in connection with its retrocession
arrangements, nor has it experienced any difficulty in collecting claims
recoverable from its retrocessionaires. No assurance can be given, however, as
to the future performance of such retrocessionaires or as to the recoverability
of any such claims.
RGA Canada maintains a staff of 51 people at the Montreal office and eleven
people in an office in Toronto as of December 31, 1997. RGA Canada employs its
own underwriting, actuarial, claims, pricing, accounting, systems, marketing and
administrative staff.
RGA's Canadian life reinsurance business was originally conducted by
General American. General American entered the Canadian life reinsurance market
in 1978 and was primarily engaged in the retrocession business, writing only a
small amount of business with primary Canadian insurers. In April 1992, General
American, through RGA Canada, purchased the life reinsurance assets and business
of National Reinsurance Company of Canada ("National Re"), including C$26.0
million of Canadian life reinsurance gross in force premiums. National Re had
been engaged in the life reinsurance business in Canada since 1972, writing
reinsurance on a direct basis with primary Canadian insurers. Accordingly, the
acquisition represented a significant expansion of General American's Canadian
life reinsurance business.
OTHER INTERNATIONAL
The other international segment includes the Latin American operations,
Asia Pacific operations, and Market Development operations. Beginning in 1994,
the Company started various international initiatives that continued to develop
during 1997. In Chile, the Company is represented by a 50% investment in BHIF
America, a Chilean insurance company, and a 100% investment in RGA Chile, a life
reinsurance company. The Company owns 100% of Manantial, an Argentine insurance
company. In addition, RGA Reinsurance has provided reinsurance on mortality risk
reinsurance associated with the privatization of the Argentine pension system.
The Company has a presence in the Asia Pacific region with a licensed branch
office in Hong Kong and a representative office in Tokyo. The Company also
established subsidiary companies in Australia in January 1996; namely,
Australian Holdings, a wholly-owned holding company, and RGA Australia, a
wholly-owned life reinsurance company. In addition, RGA Reinsurance provides
direct reinsurance to several companies within the Asia Pacific region. The
Company's Market Development operations provide marketing support for operations
in existing and potential future markets.
Other international life reinsurance business represented 12.8%, 10.1%, and
10.3% of the Company's consolidated net premiums in 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively. No single client in the other international segment represented
more than 10% of the Company's consolidated net premium for 1997.
For other international business, RGA Reinsurance retains up to $2.5
million for U.S., Canadian, Australian, and New Zealand currency-denominated
business. For other currencies and based on countries with higher risk factors,
RGA Reinsurance systematically reduces its retention. The Chilean subsidiaries
have a policy of ceding business in excess of approximately $22,000, while the
Argentine subsidiary cedes business in excess of $40,000. RGA Australia has a
retrocession arrangement with RGA Reinsurance in which life risks above $100,000
Australian dollars are retroceded to RGA Reinsurance. On an aggregate basis
among all of its subsidiaries, the Company does not retain more than $2.5
million on any one life.
36
39
BHIF America and RGA Chile maintain staffing of 30 people at the head
offices in Santiago, Chile as of December 31, 1997. Manantial maintains a staff
of 30 people in Buenos Aires, Argentina as of December 31, 1997. These
subsidiaries employ their own underwriting, actuarial, claims, pricing,
accounting, systems, marketing and administrative staff. Within Asia Pacific,
six people were on staff in the Hong Kong office, four people were on staff in
the Tokyo office, and RGA Australia maintained a staff of twelve people in
Sydney. The Hong Kong and Tokyo offices primarily provide marketing and
underwriting service to the direct life insurance companies with other service
support provided directly by RGA Reinsurance operations.
Mature insurance markets that are experiencing regulatory changes present
opportunities for the Company. For example, changes in the Australian regulatory
environment prompted RGA to establish a subsidiary there. The experience and
knowledge that RGA gained in the Canadian regulatory environment has been
valuable in Australia, which has a similar regulatory structure. RGA Australia
directly maintains its own underwriting, actuarial, claims, pricing, accounting,
systems, marketing and administration service with additional support provided
by RGA Reinsurance operations.
ACCIDENT AND HEALTH
The Company's accident and health reinsurance business historically
represented 10.9%, 8.5%, and 8.4% of the Company's net premiums in 1997, 1996,
and 1995, respectively. Due to continuing losses emanating from certain of the
Company's accident and health operations in 1997, the strategic decision was
made to exit all outside-managed accident and health pools and cease marketing
accident and health business and to place the operation into run-off. The
Company estimates that future accident and health premiums compared to 1997
premiums will remain level in 1998. Premiums will decrease at varying rates
through 2002.
For additional information regarding the Company's accident and health
reinsurance business, see Item 1 "Business -- Industry Segments" in RGA's Annual
Report in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated
by reference in this Prospectus.
UNDERWRITING
FACULTATIVE
Senior management has developed underwriting guidelines, policies, and
procedures with the objective of controlling the quality of life business
written as well as its pricing. The underwriting process emphasizes close
collaboration among its underwriting, actuarial, and operations departments.
Management periodically updates these underwriting policies, procedures, and
standards to account for changing industry conditions, market developments, and
changes occurring in the field of medical technology; however, no assurance can
be given that all relevant information has been analyzed or that additional
risks will not materialize. These policies, procedures, and standards are
documented in an on-line underwriting manual.
The Company determines whether to accept facultative reinsurance business
on a prospective insured by reviewing the client company's applications and
medical requirements, and assessing financial information and any medical
impairments. Most facultative applications involve a prospective insured with
multiple impairments, such as heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes,
requiring a difficult underwriting assessment. To assist its underwriters in
making this assessment, RGA Reinsurance employs two full-time and one part-time
medical director, as well as one medical consultant.
AUTOMATIC
Management determines whether to write automatic reinsurance business by
considering many factors, including the types of risks to be covered; the ceding
company's retention limit and binding authority, product, and pricing
assumptions; and the ceding company's underwriting standards, financial strength
and distribution systems. For automatic business, the Company endeavors to
ensure that the underwriting standards and procedures of its ceding companies
are compatible with its own underwriting standards and procedures. To this end,
the Company conducts periodic reviews of the ceding companies' underwriting and
claims personnel and procedures.
37
40
FINANCIAL REINSURANCE
The financial reinsurance provided by the Company is repaid by the future
profit stream associated with the reinsured block of business. The Company
structures its financial reinsurance transactions so that the future profits of
the underlying reinsured business conservatively exceed the amount of regulatory
surplus provided to the ceding company.
AIDS
Since 1987, the U.S. and Canadian life insurance industries have
implemented the practice of antibody blood testing to detect the presence of the
HIV virus associated with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ("AIDS"). Prior to
the onset of routine antibody testing, it was possible for applicants with AIDS
to purchase significant amounts of life insurance. Since 1987, the guidelines
used by the U.S. operations have required ceding companies to conduct HIV
testing for life insurance risks at or above $100,000. Since 1987, the accepted
Canadian industry practice is to conduct HIV testing for life insurance risks
over C$100,000.
The Company believes that the antibody test for AIDS is effective. No
assurance can be given, however, that additional AIDS-related death claims
involving insureds who test negative for AIDS at the time of underwriting will
not arise in the future. The Company believes that its primary exposure to the
AIDS risk is related to business issued before the onset of AIDS antibody
testing in 1987. Each year, this business represents a smaller portion of the
Company's reinsurance in force.
COMPETITION
The Company operates in an intensely competitive environment. Reinsurers
compete on the basis of many factors, including financial strength, pricing and
other terms and conditions of reinsurance agreements, reputation, service, and
experience in the types of business underwritten. The U.S. and Canadian life
reinsurance markets are served by numerous international and domestic
reinsurance companies. The Company believes that RGA Reinsurance's primary
competitors in the U.S. life reinsurance market are currently Transamerica
Occidental Life Insurance Company, Swiss Re Life of America, Security Life of
Denver, Life Reassurance Corporation of America, and Lincoln National
Corporation. Within the reinsurance industry, however, competition can change
from year to year. The Company believes that RGA Canada's major competitors in
the Canadian life reinsurance market are Swiss Re Life Canada and Munich
Reinsurance Company of Canada.
The other international life operations compete with subsidiaries of
several U.S. individual and group life insurers and reinsurers and other
internationally-based insurers and reinsurers, some of which are larger and have
access to greater resources than the Company. Competition is primarily on the
basis of price, service, and financial strength.
REGULATION
RGA Reinsurance, RGA Canada, BHIF America, RGA Chile, Manantial, RGA
Barbados, RGA Bermuda, RGA Australia, and RGA UK are regulated by authorities in
Missouri, Canada, Chile, Argentina, Barbados, Bermuda, Australia, and the United
Kingdom, respectively. RGA Reinsurance is subject to regulations in the other
jurisdictions in which it is licensed or authorized to do business. Insurance
laws and regulations, among other things, establish minimum capital requirements
and limit the amount of dividends, distributions, and intercompany payments
affiliates can make without prior regulatory approval. Missouri law imposes
restrictions on the amounts and type of investments insurance companies like RGA
Reinsurance may hold.
GENERAL
The insurance laws and regulations, as well as the level of supervisory
authority that may be exercised by the various insurance departments, vary by
jurisdiction but generally grant broad powers to supervisory agencies or
regulators to examine and supervise insurance companies and insurance holding
companies with
38
41
respect to every significant aspect of the conduct of the insurance business,
including approval or modification of contractual arrangements. These laws and
regulations generally require insurance companies to meet certain solvency
standards and asset tests, to maintain minimum standards of business conduct,
and to file certain reports with regulatory authorities, including information
concerning their capital structure, ownership, and financial condition, and
subject insurers to potential assessments for amounts paid by guarantee funds.
RGA Reinsurance and RGA Canada are required to file annual or quarterly
statutory financial statements in each jurisdiction in which they are licensed.
Additionally, RGA Reinsurance and RGA Canada are subject to periodic examination
by the insurance departments of the jurisdictions in which each is licensed,
authorized, or accredited. The most recent examination of RGA Reinsurance by the
Missouri Department of Insurance was for the year ended December 31, 1995. The
result of this examination contained no material adverse findings. RGA Canada,
which was formed in 1992, was reviewed by the Canadian Superintendent of
Financial Institutions during 1997. The result of this examination contained no
material adverse findings.
RGA Australia is required to file a quarterly statistical return and annual
financial statement with the Insurance and Superannuation Commission of
Australia ("ISC"). RGA Australia is subject to additional reviews by the ISC on
an as required basis. In August 1997, RGA Australia was reviewed by the ISC with
no material adverse findings.
RGA Barbados is required to file an annual financial statement with the
Office of the Supervisor of Insurance of Barbados.
Manantial as a direct life insurance company is required to file annual and
quarterly statutory financial statements in Argentina which are reviewed by
external auditors and filed with the Superintendencia de Seguros de la Nacion
("Superintendencia-Argentina"). Additionally, Manantial is subject to periodic
examination by the Superintendencia-Argentina. The most recent examination by
the Superintendencia-Argentina was in March 1997. The results of this
examination were discussed with management and all adjustments were reflected
during 1997.
BHIF America and RGA Chile are required to file annual and quarterly
regulatory financial statements in Chile which are reviewed by external auditors
annually and filed with the Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros de Chile
("Superintendencia-Chile"). The most recent examination by the
Supeintendencia-Chile was during 1997. The result of this examination contained
no material adverse findings.
Although some of the rates and policy terms of U.S. direct insurance
agreements are regulated by state insurance departments, the rates, policy
terms, and conditions of reinsurance agreements generally are not subject to
regulation by any regulatory authority. The NAIC Model Law on Credit for
Reinsurance, which has been adopted in most states, imposes, however, certain
requirements for an insurer to take reserve credit for reinsurance ceded to a
reinsurer. Generally, the reinsurer is required to be licensed or accredited in
the insurer's state of domicile, or security must be posted for reserves
transferred to the reinsurer in the form of letter of credit or assets placed in
trust. The NAIC Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation, which
has been passed in most states, imposes additional requirements for insurers to
claim reserve credit for reinsurance ceded (excluding yearly renewable term
("YRT") reinsurance and non-proportional reinsurance). These requirements
include bona fide risk transfer, an insolvency clause, written agreements, and
filing of reinsurance agreements involving in force business, among other
things.
In recent years, the NAIC and insurance regulators increasingly have been
re-examining existing laws and regulations and their application to insurance
companies. In particular, this re-examination has focused on insurance company
investment and solvency issues and, in some instances, has resulted in new
interpretation of existing law, the development of new laws, and the
implementations of non-statutory guidelines. The NAIC has formed committees and
appointed advisory groups to study and formulate regulatory proposals on such
diverse issues as the use of surplus debentures, accounting for reinsurance
transactions, and the adoption of risk-based capital rules. It is not possible
to predict the future impact of changing state and federal regulation on the
operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
The NAIC and insurance regulators are in the process of reexamining
existing laws and regulations and their application to insurance companies. In
particular, this reexamination has focused on insurance company
39
42
investment and solvency issues and, in some instances, has resulted in new
interpretations of existing law, the development of new laws and the
implementation of nonstatutory guidelines. The NAIC has formed committees and
appointed advisory groups to study and formulate regulatory proposals on diverse
issues. As part of this review, the NAIC recently adopted the Valuation of Life
Insurance Policies Model Regulation (the "Model Regulation").
If adopted in its current form, the Model Regulation will have the greatest
impact on level term life insurance products with current premiums guaranteed
for more than five years. Companies with these products generally will have to
increase reserves above the current levels or limit the period of guaranteed
premiums to five years. The Model Regulation also will impact the reserve
requirements for other increasing premium products, deficiency reserves and
certain benefit guarantees in universal life products. The Model Regulation will
not impact the financial statements of the Company prepared in accordance with
GAAP; however, as a statutory accounting principle, the Model Regulation may
impact the statutory financial statements of the subsidiaries.
In addition to the above regulatory changes being reexamined and considered
by the NAIC, the NAIC is in the process of codifying statutory accounting
principles. The purpose of such codification is to establish a uniform set of
accounting rules and regulations for use by insurance companies in financial
report preparation in connection with financial reporting to regulatory
authorities. The Company is unable to determine what impact, if any, this
codification will have on its subsidiaries' statutory surplus requirements.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Guidelines on MCCSR became effective for Canadian insurance companies in
December 1992, and RBC guidelines promulgated by the NAIC became effective for
U.S. companies in 1993. The MCCSR risk-based capital guidelines, which are
applicable to RGA Canada, prescribe surplus requirements and take into account
both assets and liabilities in establishing solvency margins. The RBC
guidelines, applicable to RGA Reinsurance, similarly identify minimum capital
requirements based upon business levels and asset mix. Both RGA Canada and RGA
Reinsurance maintain capital levels in excess of the amounts required by the
applicable guidelines. Regulations in Chile, Argentina, Australia, Barbados and
Bermuda, also require certain minimum capital levels, and subject the companies
operating there to oversight by the applicable regulatory bodies. The Company's
subsidiaries in Chile, Argentina, Australia, Barbados, and Bermuda meet the
minimum capital requirements in their respective jurisdiction. The Company
cannot predict the effect that any proposed or future legislation or rule-making
in the countries in which the Company operates may have on the financial
condition or operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY REGULATIONS
RGA is regulated in Missouri as an insurance holding company. The Company
is subject to regulation under the insurance and insurance holding company
statutes of Missouri. The Missouri insurance holding company laws and
regulations generally require insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries of
insurance holding companies to register with the Missouri Department of
Insurance and to file with the Missouri Department of Insurance certain reports
describing, among other information, their capital structure, ownership,
financial condition, certain intercompany transactions, and general business
operations. The Missouri insurance holding company statutes and regulations also
require prior approval of, or in certain circumstances, prior notice to the
Missouri Department of Insurance of certain material intercompany transfers of
assets, as well as certain transactions between insurance companies, their
parent companies and affiliates.
Under Missouri insurance laws and regulations, unless (i) certain filings
are made with the Missouri Department of Insurance, (ii) certain requirements
are met, including a public hearing, and (iii) approval or exemption is granted
by the Missouri Director of Insurance, no person may acquire any voting security
or security convertible into a voting security of an insurance holding company,
such as RGA, which controls a Missouri insurance company, or merge with such a
holding company, if as a result of such transaction such person would "control"
the insurance holding company. "Control" is presumed to exist under Missouri law
if a person directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more or the voting
securities of another person.
40
43
Certain state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that alter, and
in many cases increase, state regulation of insurance holding companies. In
recent years, the NAIC and state legislators have begun re-examining existing
laws and regulations, specifically focusing on insurance company investments and
solvency issues, risk-based capital guidelines, intercompany transactions in a
holding company system, and rules concerning extraordinary dividends.
Canadian insurance laws and regulations do not contain automatic
registration and reporting requirements applicable to insurance holding
companies, although such companies, together with all affiliates of a Canadian
insurance company, may be required to supply such information to the Canadian
Superintendent of Financial Institutions upon request.
Transactions whereby a person or entity would acquire control of or a
significant interest in, or increase (by more than an insignificant amount) its
existing interest in, a Canadian insurance company are subject to the prior
approval of the Canadian Minister of Finance. "Significant interest" in an
insurance company means the beneficial ownership of shares representing 10% or
more of a given class, while "control" of an insurance company is presumed to
exist when a person beneficially owns shares representing more than 50% of the
votes entitled to be cast for the election of directors and such votes are
sufficient to elect a majority of the directors of the insurance company. Any
transaction or series of transactions with the same person involving the
acquisition or disposition by a Canadian insurance company of assets (other than
the payment of dividends) the aggregate value of which, over a twelve-month
period, exceeds 10% of such company's total assets are also subject to the prior
approval of the Canadian Superintendent of Financial Institutions.
In addition, Canadian insurance laws and regulations generally prohibit
transactions between insurance companies and related parties, with certain
specified exceptions. Permitted related-party transactions must be on terms that
are at least as favorable to the insurance company as market terms and
conditions, and are subject to the approval of the insurance company's conduct
review committee. Reinsurance agreements with related parties are also
restricted unless (i) the reinsurance is taken out in the ordinary course of
business and (ii) the related party is either a Canadian insurance company or a
foreign insurance company duly registered in Canada.
RESTRICTIONS ON DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Certain state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that alter, and
in many cases increase, state regulation of insurance holding companies. In
recent years, the NAIC and state legislators have begun re-examining existing
laws and regulations, specifically focusing on insurance company investments and
solvency issues, risk-based capital guidelines, intercompany transactions in a
holding company system, and rules concerning extraordinary dividends.
Current Missouri law (applicable to RGA and RGA Reinsurance) permits the
payment of dividends or distributions which, together with dividends or
distributions paid during the preceding twelve months, do not exceed the greater
of (i) 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the preceding December 31, or
(ii) statutory net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year. Any
proposed dividend in excess of this amount is considered an "extraordinary
dividend" and may not be paid until it has been approved, or a 30-day waiting
period has passed during which it has not been disapproved, by the Missouri
Director of Insurance. In addition, dividends may be paid only to the extent the
insurer has earned surplus (as opposed to contributed surplus). For example, the
maximum amount available for payment of dividends in 1998 by RGA Reinsurance
under Missouri law, without the prior approval of the Missouri Director of
Insurance, is $24.9 million.
In contrast to current Missouri law, the NAIC Model Insurance Holding
Company Act (the "Model Act") defines an extraordinary dividend as a dividend or
distribution which, together with dividends or distributions paid during the
preceding twelve months, exceeds the lesser of (i) 10% of statutory capital and
surplus as of the preceding December 31, or (ii) statutory net gain from
operations for the preceding calendar year. The Company is unable to predict
whether, when, or in what form Missouri will enact a new measure for
extraordinary dividends. The maximum amount available for payment on dividends
in 1998 by RGA
41
44
Reinsurance under the Model Act without prior approval of the Missouri Director
of Insurance would have been $12.1 million at December 31, 1997.
In addition to the foregoing, Missouri insurance laws and regulations
require that the statutory surplus of RGA Reinsurance following any dividend or
distribution be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and
adequate to meet its financial needs. The Missouri Director of Insurance may
bring an action to enjoin or rescind the payment of a dividend or distribution
by RGA Reinsurance that would cause its statutory surplus to be inadequate under
the standards of Missouri.
There are no express restrictions on the declaration of dividends by RGA
International, RGA Canada Management, or RGA Canada under Canadian insurance
laws and regulations. RGA Canada must, however, give notice of any dividend to
the Superintendent of Financial Institutions of Canada at least ten days prior
to the date of payment. In addition, the Canadian MCCSR guidelines consider both
assets and liabilities in establishing solvency margins, the effect of which
could limit the maximum amount of dividends that may be paid by RGA Canada. RGA
Canada's ability to declare and pay dividends in the future will be affected by
its continued ability to comply with such guidelines. The maximum amount
available for payment of dividends by RGA Canada to RGA Canada Management under
the Canadian MCCSR guidelines was $15.5 million at December 31, 1997.
DEFAULT OR LIQUIDATION
In the event of a default on any debt that may be incurred by RGA or the
bankruptcy, liquidation, or other reorganization of RGA, the creditors and
stockholders of RGA will have no right to proceed against the assets of RGA
Reinsurance, RGA Canada, or other insurance or reinsurance company subsidiaries
of RGA. If RGA Reinsurance were to be liquidated, such liquidation would be
conducted by the Missouri Director of Insurance as the receiver with respect to
such insurance company's property and business. If RGA Canada were to be
liquidated, such liquidation would be conducted pursuant to the general laws
relating to the winding-up of Canadian federal companies. In both cases, all
creditors of such insurance company, including, without limitation, holders of
its reinsurance agreements and, if applicable, the various state guaranty
associations, would be entitled to payment in full from such assets before RGA,
as a direct or indirect stockholder, would be entitled to receive any
distributions made to it prior to commencement of the liquidation proceedings,
and, if the subsidiary was insolvent at the time of the distribution,
stockholders of RGA might likewise be required to refund dividends subsequently
paid to them.
If RGA Australia were to be liquidated, such liquidation would be conducted
pursuant to the general laws relating to winding-up of Australian insurance
companies as prescribed in the Australian Life Insurance Act 1995 and conducted
in accordance with the Corporations Law of the State or internal territory under
which RGA Australia was incorporated. The assets of RGA Australia would then be
applied by specific priority as specified in the Corporations Law of the State.
FEDERAL REGULATION
Discussions continue in the Congress of the United States concerning the
future of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which exempts the "business of insurance"
from most federal laws, including anti-trust laws, to the extent such business
is subject to state regulation. Judicial decisions narrowing the definition of
what constitutes the "business of insurance" and repeal or modification of the
McCarran-Ferguson Act may limit the ability of the Company, and RGA Reinsurance
in particular, to share information with respect to matters such as
rate-setting, underwriting, and claims management. It is not possible to predict
the effect of such decisions or change in the law on the operation of the
Company.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
GenAmerica Corporation and its affiliates generated less than 4.2% of U.S.
operations gross premiums in 1997, 1996, and 1995, exclusive of the retrocession
agreements between RGA Reinsurance and General American described in Item 13
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in RGA's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated by reference in
this Prospectus.
42
45
The Company has direct policies and reinsurance agreements with General American
and certain of its subsidiaries. These agreements are terminable by either party
on 90 days' written notice with respect to new business only. The Company
received gross premiums pursuant to these agreements of approximately $32.1
million in 1997. The stable value products reinsured by the Company are also
General American products. Deposits from stable value products totaled
approximately $483.0 million and $429.3 million during 1997 and 1996,
respectively. In addition, the Company entered into annuity reinsurance
transactions during the second quarter of 1997 with Cova Financial Services Life
Insurance Company, a subsidiary of General American. Deposits related to this
business were $124.4 million as of December 31, 1997.
Under separate investment advisory agreements, Conning, an indirect
subsidiary of General American, manages certain investment portfolios of RGA,
RGA Reinsurance, Australia Holdings, and RGA Barbados and services commercial
mortgages on behalf of RGA Reinsurance. Each of the investment advisory
agreements is terminable by either party on 90 days' written notice. For its
services, Conning receives an annual fee of 0.09% of the average quarterly book
value of the portfolios managed and 0.22% of mortgage loans serviced. This fee
is payable quarterly in arrears. The Company made payments to Conning of
approximately $1.7 million for such investment advisory services in 1997. As
part of its investment advisory services, Conning also originates commercial
mortgages on behalf of RGA Reinsurance. Conning generally receives a fee
associated with the origination of such loans in the amount of 1% of the loan
balance, which is paid by the borrower. During 1997, Conning originated
approximately $78.0 million of mortgage loans on behalf of RGA Reinsurance.
Separate from the investment advisory agreements, Conning manages a series of
private investment funds in which RGA has invested from time to time. Conning
receives a management fee and a specified percentage of the funds' net gains,
which are paid by the funds. RGA's investments in such funds totaled
approximately $1.4 million as of December 31, 1997.
The Company conducts its business primarily from premises leased by RGA
Reinsurance from General American. RGA Reinsurance made rental payments to
General American principally for office space and equipment of approximately
$1.6 million in 1997.
RGA, RGA Reinsurance, RGA Canada and certain other subsidiaries of RGA also
are parties to various other agreements with General American, including
retrocession agreements, marketing agreements, tax allocation and tax sharing
agreements and administrative services agreements. These agreements and certain
other relationships with others are described under Item 13 "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" in RGA's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus.
43
46
MANAGEMENT
The following table lists the directors and certain executive officers of
the Company and certain subsidiaries as indicated below:
NAME AGE TITLE
---- --- -----
Richard A. Liddy..................... 62 Chairman of the Board of the Company
A. Greig Woodring.................... 46 President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
David B. Atkinson.................... 44 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
the Company
Bruce E. Counce...................... 53 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
the Company
Jack B. Lay.......................... 43 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company
Andre St-Amour....................... 47 President and Chief Executive Officer of RGA Canada
Graham S. Watson..................... 48 Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of
the Company
J. Cliff Eason....................... 50 Director
Bernard A. Edison.................... 70 Director
Stuart I. Greenbaum.................. 61 Director
William A. Peck, M.D................. 64 Director
Leonard M. Rubenstein................ 52 Director
William P. Stiritz................... 63 Director
H. Edwin Trusheim.................... 70 Director
Richard A. Liddy is Chairman of the Board of the Company. He also serves as
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of General American
Life Insurance Company, and President and Chairman of GenAmerica Corporation and
General American Mutual Holding Company. From 1982 through 1988, he was Senior
Vice President and Executive Vice President of Continental Corporation, and
President, Financial Services Group of Continental Insurance Company. He is also
Chairman of the Board of General American Capital Company and The Walnut Street
Funds, Inc., each a registered investment company, and is a director of Ameren
Corporation, Brown Group, Inc., Conning Corporation and Ralston Purina Company.
Mr. Liddy is also Chairman of Cova Corporation, Paragon Life Insurance Company,
Security Equity life Insurance Company and Security Mutual Life Insurance
Company of New York, and a number of other subsidiaries and affiliates of
General American Mutual Holding Company.
A. Greig Woodring is President, Chief Executive Officer, and director of
the Company. Mr. Woodring also is an executive officer of General American Life
Insurance Company. Prior to the formation of RGA, Mr. Woodring had headed
General American's reinsurance business since 1986. He also serves as a director
and officer of a number of the Company's subsidiaries. Before joining General
American Life Insurance Company, Mr. Woodring was an actuary at United Insurance
Company.
David B. Atkinson has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company since January 1997. He is also President and Chief
Executive Officer of RGA Reinsurance. He served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Operations of the Company from 1995 to 1996 and
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1993 to 1994. Prior to
the formation of RGA, Mr. Atkinson served as Reinsurance Operations Vice
President of General American. Mr. Atkinson joined General American in 1987 as
Second Vice President and was promoted to Vice President later the same year.
Prior to joining General American, he served as Vice President and Actuary of
Atlas Life Insurance Company from 1981 to 1987, as Chief Actuarial Consultant at
Cybertek Computer Products from 1979 to 1981, and in a
44
47
variety of actuarial positions with Occidental Life Insurance Company of
California from 1975 to 1979. Mr. Atkinson also serves as a director and officer
of certain RGA subsidiaries.
Bruce E. Counce has been Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate
Operating Officer of the Company since January 1997. He served as Executive Vice
President, U.S. Traditional Reinsurance from 1993 to 1997. Prior to the
formation of RGA, Mr. Counce served as Reinsurance Sales and Marketing Vice
President for General American. After joining General American in 1967, Mr.
Counce joined the Reinsurance Division in 1980 in a sales capacity and held a
series of increasingly responsible positions leading to his current position.
Jack B. Lay is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company. Prior to joining the Company in 1994, Mr. Lay served as Second Vice
President and Associate Controller at General American. In that position, he was
responsible for all accounting and exterial financial reporting as well as
merger and acquisition support. Before joining General American in 1991, Mr. Lay
was a partner in the financial services practice with the St. Louis office of
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP. Mr. Lay also served as director and officer of certain
RGA subsidiaries.
Andre St-Amour is President and Chief Executive Officer of RGA Canada and
Chief Agent for the General American Life Insurance Company Canadian Branch.
Prior to January 1995, he was President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr.
St-Amour joined RGA Canada in 1992 when the company acquired the reinsurance
business of National Re. Mr. St-Amour served as Executive Vice President, Life
Division, of National Re from 1989 to 1991. Prior to joining National Re, Mr.
St-Amour served in a variety of actuarial positions with Canadian National
Railways and Laurentian National Insurance Company.
Graham S. Watson is Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of
RGA. Upon joining RGA in 1996, Mr. Watson was President and Chief Executive
Officer of RGA Australia. Prior to joining RGA, Mr. Watson was the President and
CEO of Intercedent Limited in Canada and has held various positions of
increasing responsibility for other life insurance companies. Mr. Watson also
serves as a director and officer of certain RGA subsidiaries.
J. Cliff Eason has been the President-SBC International Operations of SBC
Communications, Inc. since March 1998. Prior to that he served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company since February
1996. Mr. Eason was President and Chief Executive Officer of Southwestern Bell
Communications, Inc. ("SBC") from July 1995 through January 1996; President of
Network Services of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company from July 1993 through
June 1995; and President of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company of the Midwest
from 1992 to 1993. He held various other positions with SBC and its subsidiaries
prior to 1992, including President of SBC Communications, Inc. from 1991 to
1992.
Bernard A. Edison was the President of Edison Brothers Stores, Inc. from
1968 through his retirement in 1987. He also serve as a director and Chairman of
the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors of Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.
until 1989, and as director emeritus from 1989 through 1996. Mr. Edison is also
a director of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., GenAmerica Corporation, General
American Life Insurance Company, and General American Mutual Holding Company.
Stuart I. Greenbaum has been the Dean of John M. Olin School of Business at
Washington University since July 1995. Prior to such time, he spent 20 years at
the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University where he
was Director of the Banking Research Center and the Norman Strunk Distinguished
Professor of Financial Institutions. Mr. Greenbaum has served on the Federal
Savings and Loan Advisory Council and the Illinois Task Force on Financial
Services, and has been a consultant for the American Bankers Association, the
Bank Administration Institute, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal
Reserve System, and the Federal Home Loan Bank System, among others. He is also
a director of Stifel Financial Corp.
William A. Peck, M.D., has been the Executive Vice Chancellor for Medical
Affairs and Dean of the School of Medicine of Washington University since 1989.
From 1976 to 1989, he was Physician in Chief of The Jewish Hospital of St.
Louis. He is also a director of Allied Health Care Products, Inc., Angelica
Corporation, Hologic, Inc., and Magna Bancorp, Inc.
45
48
Leonard M. Rubenstein is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Conning
Corporation and its subsidiary, Conning Asset Management Company, a registered
investment advisor. Conning Corporation is a majority-owned subsidiary of
General American Life Insurance Company. Conning & Company, an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Conning Corporation, is one of the representatives of
the Underwriters. He served as Executive Vice President of Investments for
General American Life Insurance Company from 1991 to January 1997 and as
Treasurer from 1991 to 1995. From 1984 to 1991, he served as Vice President of
General American Life Insurance Company. He is Treasurer of General American
Capital Company, a registered investment company.
William P. Stiritz has been the Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of Agribrands International, Inc., which is in the animal feeds and
agricultural products business, since the company was spun-off from Ralston
Purina Company ("Ralston") on April 1, 1998. He was Chief Executive Officer and
President of Ralston from 1982 until 1997 and held various other positions with
Ralston since 1963. He is Chairman of the Board of Ralston and Ralcorp Holdings,
Inc. and is a director of Angelica Corporation, Ball Corporation, GenAmerica
Corporation, General American Life Insurance Company, General American Mutual
Holding Company, The May Department Stores Company, and Vail Resorts, Inc.
H. Edwin Trusheim retired as Chairman of General American Life Insurance
Company in 1995 where he was Chief Executive Officer until his retirement in
1992. He served as President of General American Life Insurance Company from
1979 to 1988 and was elected Chief Executive Officer in 1981 and Chairman of the
Board in 1986. He is also a director of Angelica Corporation, GenAmerica
Corporation, General American Life Insurance Company, General American Mutual
Holding Company, Laclede Gas Company, RehabCare Corporation, and Venture Stores,
Inc.
46
49
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain stock ownership information, as of
March 1, 1998, with respect to each person known to the Company to be the
beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company's outstanding Voting Common. The
Offering relates to Non-Voting Common and no shares of such class are currently
outstanding.
VOTING COMMON
------------------------
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY PERCENT
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED OF CLASS
------------------------ ------------ --------
GenAmerica Corporation
700 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63101................................. 16,087,500(1) 63.8%
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Prudential Plaza
Newark, New Jersey 07102-3777............................. 1,317,600(2) 5.2%
- -------------------------
(1) GenAmerica Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General American
Mutual Holding Company ("GAMHC"). Shares beneficially owned by GenAmerica
Corporation are held by Equity Intermediary Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of General American Life Insurance Company ("General American").
General American is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GenAmerica Corporation.
Mr. Liddy is also a director and executive officer of GAMHC, GenAmerica
Corporation and General American, and Mr. Woodring is an executive officer
of General American. Messrs. Edison, Stiritz, and Trusheim are directors of
GAMHC, GenAmerica Corporation and General American. Mr. Rubenstein is the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Conning Corporation, a majority
owned indirect subsidiary of GenAmerica Corporation. These individuals
disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by GenAmerica
Corporation.
(2) Sole voting and dispositive power over 661,650 shares. Based on Amendment
No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed by the security holder with the Commission on
February 10, 1998.
47
50
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary is subject to the more detailed provisions of RGA's
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and RGA's Bylaws, and does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference thereto.
The following summary also assumes that the proposed amendment to the Restated
Articles of Incorporation is approved by RGA's stockholders at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders on May 27, 1998.
GENERAL
The authorized capital stock of RGA consists of 75,000,000 shares of Voting
Common, par value $0.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares of Non-Voting Common, par
value $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01
per share. See "Capitalization" for information regarding the number of shares
of Voting Common outstanding and the number of shares of Non-Voting Common that
would be outstanding prior to and after completion of the Offering.
NON-VOTING COMMON
The rights, powers and limitations of the Voting Common and the Non-Voting
Common are set forth in full in Article Three of RGA's Restated Articles of
Incorporation. The shares of Non-Voting Common to be issued upon consummation of
the Offering will be, when issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
VOTING MATTERS
The Non-Voting Common will not entitle the holder thereof to any votes
except as otherwise required by law. Consequently, holders of Non-Voting Common
will not be entitled to elect directors or vote on other matters customarily
decided by stockholders, such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of all or
substantially all of RGA's assets. The Non-Voting Common is, however,
convertible into Voting Common under certain circumstances described under
"-- Conversion of Non-Voting Common." Under the General and Business Corporation
Law of Missouri, as currently in effect, holders of Non-Voting Common will be
entitled to vote as a class upon a proposed amendment to the Company's Restated
Articles of Incorporation if the amendment would: (i) increase or decrease the
aggregate number of authorized shares of the Non-Voting Common, (ii) increase or
decrease the par value of the Non-Voting Common, (iii) create a new class of
shares having rights and preferences prior or superior to the Non-Voting Common,
(iv) increase the rights and preferences or the number of authorized shares of
any class having rights and preferences prior or superior to the Non-Voting
Common, or (v) alter or change the powers, preferences, or special rights of the
Non-Voting Common so as to affect the Non-Voting Common adversely. A merger or
consolidation involving RGA, in and of itself, is not deemed to involve a
proposed amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation for these purposes.
On matters brought before the stockholders of the Company, each holder of
Voting Common is entitled to one vote for each share of Voting Common held.
DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS
The Non-Voting Common is equal to the Voting Common in respect to dividends
and other distributions in cash, property, or shares of stock of RGA (including
distributions in connection with any recapitalization), except as described
below. The declaration of any payment of cash dividends is solely within the
discretion of RGA's Board of Directors, and there can be no assurance that such
dividends will be declared and paid with any regularity. See "Price Range of
Capital Stock and Dividends." Dividends or other distributions payable in shares
of RGA will be made to all holders of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common and
will be made only (i) in shares of Non-Voting Common to the holders of Voting
Common and to the holders of Non-Voting Common, (ii) in shares of Voting Common
to the holders of Voting Common and in shares of Non-Voting Common to the
holders of Non-Voting Common, or (iii) in any other authorized class or series
of capital stock to the holders of both classes of common stock, regardless of
the fair market value of such shares received in payment of such dividend or
other distribution. In addition, dividends or other distributions payable on the
Voting Common and Non-Voting Common in convertible securities or securities
giving the
48
51
holder a right to acquire shares of Voting Common or Non-Voting Common
("Options"), other than rights issued pursuant to stockholder rights plans of
the type entitling holders of rights other than an "acquiring person" to
purchase shares or other securities at a below-market price if certain events
occur (which rights may be distributed as a dividend pursuant to such a plan
upon shares of either class of Voting Common or Non-Voting Common without a
corresponding dividend distribution upon shares of the other), will be made to
all holders of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common and may be made (1) in
securities convertible into Voting Common or Options to acquire Voting Common to
the record holders of Voting Common and to record holders of Non-Voting Common,
or (2) in securities convertible into Voting Common or Options to acquire Voting
Common to the record holders of Voting Common and in securities convertible into
Non-Voting Common and Options to acquire Non-Voting Common to the record holders
of the Non-Voting Common. In no event will either Voting Common or Non-Voting
Common be split, subdivided or combined unless the other is proportionately
split, subdivided or combined.
CONVERSION OF NON-VOTING COMMON
Except as described below, the Non-Voting Common will not be convertible
into Voting Common or any other security of RGA.
The Non-Voting Common will be automatically converted into Voting Common on
a share-for-share basis if, as a result of the existence of the Non-Voting
Common, the Voting Common or the Non-Voting Common or both becomes excluded from
trading on all principal national securities exchanges and also is excluded from
quotation on The Nasdaq Stock Market's National Market or any other comparable
national quotation system then in use. In addition, if at any time the number of
outstanding shares of Voting Common as reflected on RGA's stock transfer books
falls below 10% of the aggregate number of outstanding shares of Voting Common
and Non-Voting Common, then all the outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common will
be automatically converted into shares of Voting Common, on a share-for-share
basis. For purposes of the immediately preceding sentence, any shares of Voting
Common or Non-Voting Common repurchased by RGA will no longer be deemed
"outstanding" from and after the date of repurchase.
In the event of any such conversion of the Non-Voting Common, certificates
that formerly represented outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common will
thereafter be deemed to represent a like number of shares of Voting Common, and
all shares of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common authorized by RGA's Restated
Articles of Incorporation will be deemed to be shares of Voting Common.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS; DISSOLUTION
In the event of a merger, consolidation, combination or similar transaction
of RGA with another entity (whether or not RGA is the surviving entity) or in
the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of RGA, the holders of
Non-Voting Common will be entitled to receive the same per share consideration
as the per share consideration, if any, received by holders of Voting Common in
that transaction. Any capital stock, however, that holders of Non-Voting Common
become entitled to receive in any merger, consolidation, combination or similar
transaction may have terms substantially similar to the terms of the Non-Voting
Common itself. Thus the surviving entity in any such transaction could have a
dual-class capital structure like that of RGA and could upon the consummation of
the merger or consolidation give voting shares to the holders of Voting Common
and non-voting shares to the holders of Non-Voting Common.
OTHER NON-VOTING COMMON PROTECTIONS
Article Three of RGA's Restated Articles of Incorporation includes a
two-pronged "Non-Voting Common Protection" provision designed with the intention
of reducing the possibility that the holders of the Non-Voting Common could be
treated unfairly in the event that a person attempts to acquire control of or to
take over RGA. The provision may also have an anti-takeover effect.
The first prong of the Non-Voting Common Protection provision seeks to
prevent a person who has crossed a certain ownership threshold from gaining
control of RGA by acquiring Voting Common without buying Non-Voting Common.
Anyone who acquires more than 15% of the outstanding Voting Common after
49
52
May 27, 1998 (the "Effective Date") and does not acquire a percentage of the
Non-Voting Common outstanding at least equal to the percentage of Voting Common
that the person acquired above the 15% threshold will not be allowed to vote the
Voting Common acquired in excess of the 15% level. For example, if a person
acquires 20% of the outstanding Voting Common after the Effective Date but
acquires no Non-Voting Common, that person would be unable to vote the 5% of the
Voting Common acquired in excess of the 15% threshold. The inability of the
person to vote the excess Voting Common will continue under RGA's Restated
Articles of Incorporation until such time as a sufficient number of shares of
Non-Voting Common have been acquired by the person that the requirements of the
Non-Voting Common Protection provision have been satisfied.
The second prong of the Non-Voting Common Protection provision is an
"Equitable Price" requirement. It is intended to prevent a person seeking to
acquire control of RGA from paying a discounted price for the Non-Voting Common
required to be purchased by the acquiring person under the first prong of the
Non-Voting Common Protection provision. Under the Restated Articles of
Incorporation, an equitable price has been paid for shares of Non-Voting Common
only when they have been acquired at a price at least equal to the greater of
(i) the highest per share price paid by the acquiring person, in cash or in
non-cash consideration, for any Voting Common acquired within the 60-day periods
preceding and following the acquisition of the Non-Voting Common, or (ii) the
highest closing market sale price of a share of Voting Common during the 30-day
period preceding the acquisition of the Non-Voting Common. The value of any
non-cash consideration will be determined by RGA's Board of Directors acting in
good faith. The highest closing market sale price of a share of Voting Common
will be the highest closing sale price on the Composite Tape for the NYSE-Listed
Stocks or such other securities exchange or other quotation system then
constituting the principal trading market for either the Voting Common or the
Non-Voting Common. In the event that no quotations are available, the highest
closing market sale price will be the fair market value of a share of Voting
Common during such 30-day period as determined by RGA's Board of Directors
acting in good faith. As a practical matter, a person seeking to acquire control
of RGA would have to buy the Voting Common and Non-Voting Common at virtually
the same time and at the same price, as might occur in a tender offer, in order
to ensure that the acquiring person would be able to vote the Voting Common
acquired in excess of the 15% threshold.
The Non-Voting Common Protection provision does not prevent any person or
group from acquiring a significant or controlling interest in RGA, provided such
person or group complies with the Non-Voting Common Protection provision or
incurs suspension of the voting rights of excess shares of Voting Common
acquired as provided by the Non-Voting Common Protection feature. The Non-Voting
Common Protection provision could make an acquisition of a significant or
controlling interest in RGA more expensive than if such requirement did not
exist. Consequently, a person or group might be deterred from acquiring a
significant or controlling interest in RGA as a result of such requirement.
Under the Non-Voting Common Protection provision, an acquisition of Voting
Common would be deemed to include any shares that a person acquires directly or
indirectly, in one transaction or a series of transactions, or with respect to
which that person acts or agrees to act in concert with any other person. Unless
there are affirmative attributes of concerted action, however, "acting or
agreeing to act in concert with any other person" will not include actions taken
or agreed to be taken by persons acting in their official capacities as
directors or officers of RGA or actions by persons merely because they are
related by blood or marriage. Also, an acquisition of Voting Common will not be
deemed to include (i) shares acquired pursuant to contracts existing prior to
the Effective Date, (ii) shares acquired by bequest or inheritance, by operation
of law upon the death of any individual, or by any other transfer without
valuable consideration, including a gift that is made in good faith and not for
purposes of circumventing the Non-Voting Common Protection provision, (iii)
shares acquired upon issuance or sale by RGA, (iv) shares acquired by operation
of law (including a merger or consolidation effected for the purpose of
recapitalizing any person, including RGA, or reincorporating any person,
including RGA, in another jurisdiction but excluding a merger or consolidation
for the purpose of acquiring another person), and (v) shares acquired by a plan
of RGA qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or acquired by reason of a distribution from such a plan. Thus, for
example, the exercise of options that were granted under any stock option plan
of
50
53
RGA prior to the Effective Date would not be considered acquisitions for
purposes of the Non-Voting Common Protection provision because the exercise
would be pursuant to a preexisting contract.
The Non-Voting Common Protection provision will not apply to (i) any
increase in a holder's percentage ownership of Voting Common resulting solely
from a change in the total number of shares of Voting Common outstanding as the
result of a repurchase of Voting Common by the Company since the last date on
which that holder acquired Voting Common, or (ii) transfers of Voting Common
from General American Mutual Holding Company, the ultimate parent of General
American ("GAMHC"), or any direct or indirect subsidiary of GAMHC, to GAMHC or
any direct or indirect subsidiary of GAMHC. The Non-Voting Common Protection
provision also provides that to the extent that the voting power of any shares
of Voting Common cannot be exercised pursuant to the provision, those shares of
Voting Common will not be included in the determination of the voting power of
RGA for any purposes under the Restated Articles of Incorporation or under the
Missouri General and Business Corporation Law.
TRANSFERABILITY; TRADING MARKET
Like the existing Voting Common, the Non-Voting Common will be freely
transferable, and except for federal and state securities law restrictions on
directors, officers and other affiliates of RGA and on persons holding
"restricted" stock, RGA's stockholders will not be restricted in their ability
to sell or transfer shares of Non-Voting Common. Application has been made to
list the shares of Non-Voting Common on the NYSE under the symbol RGA.A, subject
to official notice of issuance.
POSSIBLE DILUTION
It is possible that the Voting Common will trade at a premium compared to
the Non-Voting Common. The Board of Directors has included certain Non-Voting
Common Protection features in Article Three of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation which may help to reduce or eliminate the economic reasons for the
Voting Common to trade at a premium compared to the Non-Voting Common, although
no assurance can be given in such regard. If the Voting Common were to trade at
a premium to the Non-Voting Common, subsequent issuances of Non-Voting Common,
instead of Voting Common, in connection with a public or private offering, an
acquisition or other transaction could have a greater dilutive effect on
stockholders because such an acquisition or transaction would require more
shares to deliver the same aggregate value. To minimize dilution of voting power
to existing stockholders, RGA may be more likely to issue shares of Non-Voting
Common than Voting Common in the future to raise equity, finance acquisitions or
fund employee benefit plans.
ISSUANCES AND REPURCHASES OF STOCK
Article Three of the Restated Articles of Incorporation expressly
authorizes the Board of Directors to authorize RGA to issue and sell all or any
part of any class of stock therein or thereafter authorized, from time to time,
and at such time or times, in such amounts and manner to such persons, firms,
associations or corporations, and for such consideration, whether in cash,
property or otherwise, as the Board of Directors from time to time, in its
discretion, determines whether or not greater consideration could be received
upon the issue or sale of the same number of shares of another class, and as
otherwise permitted by law.
Article Three of the Restated Articles of Incorporation also expressly
authorizes the Board of Directors to authorize RGA to purchase from time to time
shares of any one class or any combination of classes of common stock without
regard to differences among them in price and other terms under which such
shares may be purchased. The Board of Directors, therefore, could authorize RGA
to purchase Voting Common even if the consideration which would be paid by
purchasing Non-Voting Common would be less.
PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
The Non-Voting Common will not carry any preemptive rights enabling a
holder to subscribe for or receive shares of any class of RGA's stock or any
other securities convertible into shares of any class of RGA's stock.
51
54
VOTING COMMON
All of the outstanding shares of Voting Common are fully paid and
nonassessable. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of
preferred stock which subsequently may be issued and outstanding, the holders of
Voting Common are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the
Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor, and, in the event of
liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of RGA, to share ratably in all assets
remaining after payment of liabilities. Each holder of Voting Common is entitled
to one vote for each share held of record on all matters presented to a vote of
stockholders, including the election of directors. Holders of Voting Common have
no cumulative voting rights or preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for
any stock or other securities and there are no conversion rights or redemption
or sinking fund provisions with respect to such stock. Additional shares of
authorized Voting Common may be issued without stockholder approval, subject to
applicable rules of the NYSE.
PREFERRED STOCK
The authorized preferred stock of RGA is available for issuance from time
to time at the discretion of RGA's Board of Directors without stockholder
approval. The Board of Directors has the authority to prescribe for each series
of preferred stock it establishes the number of shares in that series, the
dividend rate, and the voting rights, conversion privileges, redemption and
liquidation rights, if any, and any other rights, preferences, and limitations
of the particular series. Depending upon the rights of such preferred stock, the
issuance of preferred stock could have an adverse effect on holders of Voting
Common and Non-Voting Common by delaying or preventing a change of control of
RGA, making removal of the present management of RGA more difficult, or
resulting in restrictions upon the payment of dividends and other distributions
to the holders of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common. Except as otherwise
contemplated by the Rights Plan described, RGA presently has no intention to
issue any shares of preferred stock.
CERTAIN EFFECTS OF AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED STOCK
Upon completion of the Offering, there will be shares of Voting
Common, shares of Non-Voting Common, and shares of preferred stock
available for future issuance by RGA without stockholder approval, subject to
applicable rules of the NYSE. These additional shares may be issued for a
variety of corporate purposes, including raising additional capital, corporate
acquisitions, and employee benefit plans. Except as contemplated by the RGA
Flexible Stock Plan, the Rights Plan, and other possible employee benefit or
stock purchase plans, RGA does not currently have any plans to issue additional
shares of Voting Common or preferred stock. See "-- Preferred Stock Purchase
Rights."
One of the effects of the existence of unissued and unreserved Voting
Common, Non-Voting Common and preferred stock may be to enable the Board of
Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, which could
render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of RGA by means
of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest, or otherwise, and thereby protect the
continuity of RGA's management and possibly deprive the stockholders of
opportunities to sell their shares of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common at
prices higher than the prevailing market prices. Such additional shares also
could be used to dilute the stock ownership of persons seeking to obtain control
of RGA pursuant to the operation of the Rights Plan or otherwise. See also "--
Certain Charter and Bylaw Provisions."
PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
Under RGA's Shareholder Rights Plan, the Board of Directors has authorized
the issuance of one preferred stock purchase right (a "Right") for each
outstanding share of Voting Common and, effective upon consummation of the
Offering, for each outstanding share of Non-Voting Common. Except as set forth
below, each Right, when exercisable, entitles the registered holder to purchase
from RGA one one-hundred fiftieth (as adjusted for the three-for-two stock split
in August 1997) of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock,
$.01 par value, (the "Series A Preferred Stock"), at a price of $130 per one
one-hundredth of a share (the "Purchase Price"), subject to adjustment. The
terms of the Rights are set forth in a certain Rights Agreement, as amended,
between RGA and Chase Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights
52
55
Agent (the "Rights Agreement"). The summary of the terms of the Rights set forth
herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Rights Agreement.
Currently, no separate Rights certificates represent the Rights. Until the
earlier of (i) ten business days following the first to occur of (a) a public
announcement that, without the prior written consent of RGA, a person or group
of affiliated or associated persons, other than General American (and its
subsidiaries and affiliates) and certain subsidiaries or employee benefit or
compensation plans of RGA (an "Acquiring Person") has acquired, or obtained the
right to acquire, 20% or more of the voting power of all securities of RGA then
outstanding generally entitled to vote for the election of directors of RGA
("Voting Power"), or (b) the date on which RGA first has notice or otherwise
determines that a person has become an Acquiring Person (the "Stock Acquisition
Date"), or (ii) ten business days (or such later date as may be determined by
the Board of Directors, but in no event later than such time as any person
becomes an Acquiring Person) following the commencement of a tender offer or
exchange offer, without the prior written consent of RGA, for 20% or more of the
Voting Power of RGA (the earlier of the dates in clause (i) or (ii) above being
called the "Distribution Date"), the Rights will be evidenced by RGA's
outstanding Voting Common and Non-Voting Common certificates. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, an Acquiring Person shall not include any person or group who
inadvertently becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Voting Power,
as long as such person or group, if requested, promptly enters into an
irrevocable commitment to, and promptly does, divest enough shares to get below
the 20% threshold.
The Rights Agreement provides that, until the Distribution Date, the Rights
will be transferred with and only with RGA's Voting Common and Non-Voting
Common. Until the Distribution Date (or earlier redemption, exchange or
expiration of the Rights), new Voting Common or Non-Voting Common certificates
issued upon transfer, new issuance or issuance from RGA's treasury will contain
a notation incorporating the Rights Agreement by reference. Until the
Distribution Date (or earlier redemption, exchange or expiration of the Rights),
the transfer of the Rights associated with the Voting Common or Non-Voting
Common certificates will also constitute the transfer of the Rights associated
with the Voting Common or Non-Voting Common represented by such certificate. As
soon as practicable following the Distribution Date, separate certificates
evidencing the Rights ("Right Certificates") will be mailed to holders of record
of Voting Common and Non-Voting Common as of the close of business on the
Distribution Date and such separate certificates alone will then evidence the
Rights.
The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date. The Rights will
expire on April 15, 2003, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by RGA, as
described below.
The Purchase Price payable, and the number of shares of Series A Preferred
Stock or other securities or property issuable, upon exercise of the Rights are
subject to adjustment from time to time to prevent dilution (i) in the event of
a stock dividend on, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of, the
Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) upon the distribution to holders of Series A
Preferred Stock of rights or warrants to subscribe for shares of Series A
Preferred Stock or securities convertible into Series A Preferred Stock at less
than the then current market price of the Series A Preferred Stock, or (iii)
upon the distribution to holders of Series A Preferred Stock of evidences of
indebtedness or assets (excluding regular periodic cash dividends out of
earnings or retained earnings or dividends payable in Series A Preferred Stock)
or of convertible securities, subscription rights or warrants (other than those
referred to above).
The number of outstanding Rights and the number of one one-hundred
fiftieths of a share of Series A Preferred Stock issuable upon exercise of each
Right are also subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split of the Voting
Common or Non-Voting Common payable in Voting Common or Non-Voting Common, as
the case may be, or a stock dividend on the Voting Common or Non-Voting Common
payable in Voting Common or Non-Voting Common, as the case may be, or
subdivisions, consolidations or combinations of the Voting Common or Non-Voting
Common occurring, in any such case, prior to the Distribution Date.
In the event that, following the Distribution Date, RGA is acquired in a
merger or other business combination transaction where RGA is not the surviving
corporation or where the Voting Common or Non-Voting Common is exchanged or
changed or 50% or more of RGA's assets or earning power is sold (in one
transaction or a series of transactions), proper provision will be made so that
each holder of a Right will
53
56
thereafter have the right to receive, upon the exercise of the Right and payment
of the Purchase Price, that number of shares of capital stock of the surviving
or purchasing company (or, in certain cases, one of its affiliates) which at the
time of such transaction would have a market value of two times the Purchase
Price (such right being called the "Merger Right").
In the event that any person becomes an Acquiring Person ("Flip-in Event"),
proper provision will be made so that each holder of a Right will thereafter
have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares (or fractional
shares) of Voting Common (or, in certain cases, equivalent securities) having a
market value of two times the Purchase Price (such right being called the
"Subscription Right"). The Rights will not, however, become exercisable
following a Flip-in Event as described above until such time as the Rights are
no longer redeemable by RGA as described below.
Any Rights that are beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person or an
affiliate or an associate of an Acquiring Person will become null and void upon
the occurrence of any of the events giving rise to the exercisability of the
Subscription Right or the Merger Right and any holder of such Rights will have
no right to exercise such Rights from and after the occurrence of such an event
insofar as they relate to the Subscription Right or the Merger Right.
At any time after the acquisition by a person or group of affiliated or
associated persons of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Voting Power of
RGA and prior to the acquisition by such person or group of 50% or more of the
Voting Power of RGA, the Board of Directors of RGA may exchange the Rights
(other than Rights owned by such person or group which have become void), in
whole or in part, for, in the case of holders of Voting Common, additional
shares of Voting Common at an exchange ratio of one share of Voting Common per
Right or, in the case of holders of Non-Voting Common, additional shares of
Non-Voting Common at the exchange ratio of one share of Non-Voting Common per
Right. The RGA Board of Directors may also exchange the Rights (other than
Rights which have become void), in whole or in part, for shares of Series A
Preferred Stock at an exchange ratio of one one-hundred fiftieth of a share of
Series A Preferred Stock (or of a share of a class or series of RGA's preferred
stock having equivalent rights, preferences and privileges), per Right (subject
to adjustment).
With certain exceptions, no adjustments in the Purchase Price will be
required until cumulative adjustments require an adjustment of at least 1% in
the Purchase Price. No fractional shares will be issued (other than fractions
which are integral multiples of one one-hundred fiftieth of a share of Series A
Preferred Stock). In lieu of fractional shares, an adjustment in cash will be
made based on the market price of the stock on the last trading date prior to
the date of exercise.
At any time until the date a person becomes an Acquiring Person, RGA may
elect to redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.0067 per
Right. Immediately upon the action of the Board of Directors electing to redeem
the Rights, RGA will make announcement thereof, and the right to exercise the
Rights will terminate and the only right of the holders of Rights will be to
receive the redemption price.
The Series A Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of the Rights will
not be redeemable and will be junior to any other series of preferred stock RGA
may issue (unless otherwise provided in the terms of such stock). Each share of
Series A Preferred Stock will have a preferential dividend in an amount equal to
the greater of $1.00 per share or 150 times any dividend declared on each share
of Non-Voting Common or Voting Common. In the event of liquidation, the holders
of Series A Preferred Stock will receive a preferred liquidation payment equal
to the greater of $100.00 or 150 times the payment made per each share of Non-
Voting Common or Voting Common. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock will have
150 votes, voting together with the shares of Voting Common. In the event of any
merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of Voting Common or
Non-Voting Common are exchanged, each share of Series A Preferred Stock will be
entitled to receive 150 times the amount and type of consideration received per
share of Voting Common or Non-Voting Common. The rights of the Series A
Preferred Stock as to the dividends, liquidation and voting, and in the event of
mergers and consolidations, are protected by customary anti-dilution provisions.
Fractional shares of Series A Preferred Stock in integral multiples of one
one-hundred fiftieth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock will be issuable;
however, RGA may elect to distribute depositary receipts in lieu of such
fractional shares. In lieu of fractional shares other than fractions that are
multiples of one one-hundred
54
57
fiftieth of a share, an adjustment in cash will be made based on the market
price of the Series A Preferred Stock on the last trading date prior to the date
of exercise.
Because of the nature of the Series A Preferred Stock's voting, dividend
and liquidation features, the value of the one one-hundred fiftieth of a share
of Series A Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of each Right should
approximate the value of one share of Voting Common or Non-Voting Common.
The Board of Directors of RGA retains a broad ability to amend or
supplement the Rights Agreement without the consent of the holders of the
Rights, except that from and after such time as any person becomes an Acquiring
Person no such amendment may adversely affect the interests of the holders of
the Rights.
Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, will have no
rights as a shareholder of RGA, including, without limitation, the right to vote
or to receive dividends.
Shareholders may, depending upon the circumstances, recognize taxable
income in the event that the Rights become exercisable for Series A Preferred
Stock or other consideration as set forth above.
The Rights have certain anti-takeover effects. The Rights may cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire RGA without a
condition to such an offer that a substantial number of the Rights be acquired
or the Rights be redeemed or otherwise not apply. RGA's ability to amend the
Rights Agreement may, depending upon the circumstances, increase or decrease the
anti-takeover effects of the Rights. The Rights do not prevent the Board of
Directors of RGA from approving in advance any merger or other business
combination since the Rights may be redeemed by the Board of Directors as
described above.
CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAW PROVISIONS
RGA's Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide for a
classified Board of Directors, limit the right of stockholders to remove
directors or change the size of the Board of Directors, to fill vacancies on the
Board of Directors, to act by written consent and to call a special meeting of
stockholders, and require a higher percentage of stockholders than would
otherwise be required to amend, alter, change, or repeal the provisions of the
Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws discussed below. The Restated
Articles of Incorporation also provide that the Bylaws may be amended only by
the majority vote of the Board of Directors; thus stockholders will not be able
to amend the Bylaws without first amending the Restated Articles of
Incorporation. The foregoing provisions, which are summarized below, may have
the effect of discouraging certain types of transactions that involve an actual
or threatened change of control of RGA. Reference is made to the full text of
the Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and the following summary is
qualified in its entirety by such reference.
Size of Board, Election of Directors, Classified Board, Removal of
Directors and Filling Vacancies. The Restated Articles of Incorporation provide
that the number of directors to constitute the initial board of directors will
be three and thereafter the number of directors will be fixed from time to time
as provided in the Bylaws. The Bylaws provide for a Board of Directors of at
least three directors and permit the Board of Directors to increase the number
of Directors. In accordance with the Bylaws, the Board of Directors has fixed
the number of directors at ten. The Restated Articles of Incorporation further
provide that the Bylaws may be amended only by majority vote of the Board of
Directors.
In order for a stockholder to nominate a candidate for director, the
Restated Articles of Incorporation require that timely notice be given to RGA in
advance of the meeting. Ordinarily, such notice must be given not less than 60
days nor more than 90 days before the meeting (but if RGA gives less than 70
days' notice of the meeting, then the stockholder must give such notice within
ten days after notice of the meeting is mailed or other public disclosure of the
meeting is made). The stockholder filing the notice of nomination must describe
various matters regarding the nominee, including such information as name,
address, occupation, and shares held. The Restated Articles of Incorporation do
not permit cumulative voting in the election of directors. Accordingly, the
holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of voting stock can elect
all the directors of the class then being elected at that meeting of
stockholders.
55
58
The Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that the Board
shall be divided into three classes, with the classes to be as nearly equal in
number as possible, and that one class shall be elected each year and serve for
three-year term.
Missouri law provides that, unless a corporation's articles of
incorporation provide otherwise, the holders of a majority of the corporation's
voting stock may remove any director from office. The Restated Articles of
Incorporation provide that, except as described below, a director may be removed
by stockholders only "for cause" and with the approval of the holders of 85% of
RGA's voting stock.
Missouri law further provides that, unless a corporation's articles of
incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, all vacancies on a corporation's
board of directors, including any vacancies resulting from an increase in the
number of directors, may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining
directors even if that number is less than a quorum. The Restated Articles of
Incorporation provide that, subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of any
class of preferred stock then outstanding and except as described below,
vacancies may be filled only by the vote of a majority of the remaining
directors.
The classification of directors, the inability to vote shares cumulatively,
the advance notice requirements for nominations, and the provisions in the
Restated Articles of Incorporation that limit the ability of stockholders to
increase the size of the Board or to remove directors and that permit the
remaining directors to fill any vacancies on the Board will have the effect of
making it more difficult for stockholders to change the composition of the
Board. As a result, at least two annual meetings of stockholders may be required
for the stockholders to change a majority of the directors, whether or not a
change in the Board would be beneficial to RGA and its stockholders and whether
or not a majority of RGA's stockholders believes that such change would be
desirable.
Limitations on Stockholder Action by Written Consent; Limitations on
Calling Stockholder Meetings. As required to Missouri law, the Bylaws provide
that any action by written consent of stockholders in lieu of a meeting must be
unanimous. Under the Restated Articles of Incorporation, except as described
below, stockholders are not permitted to call special meetings of stockholders
or to require the Board to call a special meeting of stockholders, and a special
meeting of stockholders may be called only by a majority of the entire Board of
Directors, the Chairman of the Board or the President. In order for a
stockholder to bring a proposal before a stockholder meeting, the Restated
Articles of Incorporation require that timely notice be given to RGA in advance
of the meeting. Ordinarily, such notice must be given at least 60 days but not
more than 90 days before the meeting (but if RGA gives less than 70 days' notice
of the meeting, then the stockholder must give such notice within ten days after
notice of the meeting is mailed or other public disclosure of the meeting is
made). Such notice must include a description of the proposal, the reasons
therefor, and other specified matters. The Board may reject any such proposals
that are not made in accordance with these procedures or that are not a proper
subject for stockholder action in accordance with the provisions of applicable
law.
The provision of the Bylaws requiring unanimity for stockholder action by
written consent gives all the stockholders of RGA entitled to vote on a proposed
action the opportunity to participate in such action and will prevent the
holders of a majority of the voting power of RGA from using the written consent
procedure to take stockholder action. Moreover, a stockholder cannot force a
stockholder consideration of a proposal over the opposition of the Board of
Directors by calling a special meeting of stockholders or forcing consideration
of such a proposal.
These provisions are designed in part to make it more difficult and
time-consuming to obtain majority control of the Board of Directors of RGA or
otherwise bring a matter before stockholders without the Board's consent, and
thus reduce the vulnerability of RGA to an unsolicited takeover proposal. These
provisions are designed to enable RGA to develop its business in a manner which
will foster its long-term growth, with the threat of a takeover not deemed by
the Board to be in the best interests of RGA and its stockholders and the
potential disruption entailed by such a threat reduced to the extent
practicable. On the other hand, these provisions may have an adverse effect on
the ability of stockholders to influence the governance of RGA and the
possibility of stockholders receiving a premium above market price for the
securities from a potential acquirer who is unfriendly to management. In
addition, The General and Business Corporation Law of
56
59
Missouri also contains certain provisions which may have such an effect,
including control share acquisition and business combination statutes.
TRANSFER AGENT
The transfer agent and registrar for the Non-Voting Common, the Voting
Common and the Rights is Chase Mellon Stockholder Services, L.L.C.
STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
RGA will deliver to the holders of Non-Voting Common the same proxy
statements, annual reports, and other information and reports that it delivers
to the holders of Voting Common.
57
60
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF NON-VOTING COMMON
The following discussion concerns the material United States federal income
tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of shares of Non-Voting Common
applicable to Non-U.S. Holders of shares of Non-Voting Common. In general, a
"Non-U.S. Holder" is any holder other than (i) a citizen or resident of the
U.S., (ii) a corporation, partnership or an entity that is taxed as a
partnership created or organized in the U.S. or under the laws of the U.S. or
any political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate whose income is includable in
gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or
(iv) a trust for which a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary
supervision over the administration of the trust, and for which one or more U.S.
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
The discussion is based on current provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), applicable final and temporary Treasury
Regulations ("Treasury Regulations"), judicial authority, and current
administrative rulings and pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service
("IRS") and upon the facts concerning RGA as of the date hereof. There can be no
assurance that the IRS will not take a contrary view, and no ruling from the IRS
has been or will be sought by RGA. Legislative, judicial, or administrative
changes or interpretations may be forthcoming that could alter or modify the
statements and conclusions set forth herein. Any such changes or interpretations
may or may not be retroactive and could affect the tax consequences to Non-U.S.
Holders.
This discussion does not address all aspects of federal income taxation and
does not address any aspects of federal estate taxation or of state, local or
foreign tax laws. The discussion does not consider any specific facts or
circumstances that may apply to a particular Non-U.S. Holder (including the fact
that in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a partnership, partners should be
aware that the U.S. tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares of
Non-Voting Common may be affected by certain determinations made at the
partnership level). Accordingly, prospective investors are urged to consult
their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income,
estate and other tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares of
Non-Voting Common.
TAXATION OF DIVIDENDS AND DISPOSITIONS
Dividends on Non-Voting Common. Subject to the discussion below, dividends,
if any (see "Price Range of Capital Stock and Dividends"), paid to a Non-U.S.
Holder generally will be subject to United States withholding tax at a 30% rate
(or a lower rate as may be prescribed by an applicable tax treaty) unless the
dividends are effectively connected with a trade or business of the Non-U.S.
Holder within the U.S. Dividends effectively connected with a trade or business
will generally not be subject to withholding (if the Non-U.S. Holder complies
with applicable IRS reporting requirements) and generally will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at regular graduated rates. In the
case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation, such effectively connected
income also may be subject to the branch profits tax (which is generally imposed
on a foreign corporation on the deemed repatriation from the U.S. of effectively
connected earnings and profits) at a 30% rate (or a lower rate as may be
prescribed by an applicable tax treaty). Under currently effective U.S. Treasury
Regulations, dividends paid on or before December 31, 1999 to an address outside
the U.S. are presumed to be paid to a resident of such country for purposes of
the withholding tax, absent knowledge that such presumption is not warranted.
Under interpretations of currently effective U.S. Treasury Regulations, the same
presumption applies to determine the applicability of a reduced rate of
withholding under a tax treaty. Thus, Non-U.S. Holders receiving dividends at
addresses outside the U.S. are not currently required to file tax forms to
obtain the benefit of reduced withholding at an applicable treaty rate. Recently
finalized U.S. Treasury Regulations applicable to dividends paid after December
31, 1999 (the "Final Regulations") generally provide that the status of a payee
as a Non-U.S. Holder would be made based upon a withholding certificate. In
addition, the Final Regulations establish certain presumptions (which differ
from those discussed above) upon which RGA may generally rely to determine
whether, in the absence of certain documentation, a holder should be treated as
a Non-U.S. Holder for purposes of the 30% withholding tax described above. The
presumptions would not apply for purposes of granting reduced rate of
withholding under a treaty. Under the Final Regulations, to obtain a reduced
rate of withholding under a treaty, Non-U.S.
58
61
Holder will generally be required either (i) to provide an IRS Form W-8
certifying such Non-U.S. Holder's entitlement to benefits under a treaty
together with, in certain circumstances, additional information, or (ii) satisfy
certain other applicable certification requirements. The Final Regulations also
provide special rules to determine whether, for purposes of determining the
applicability of a tax treaty and for purposes of the 30% withholding tax
described above, dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder that is an entity should be
treated as paid to the entity or those holding an interest in that entity.
A Non-U.S. Holder of Common Stock eligible for a reduced rate of
withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any
excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.
Dispositions of Non-Voting Common. Generally, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be
subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain realized upon the
disposition of such holder's shares of Non-Voting Common unless (i) (a) the gain
is effectively connected with a trade or business carried on by the Non-U.S.
Holder within the U.S. (in which case the branch profits tax may also apply), or
(b) if a tax treaty applies, the gain is attributable to a U.S. permanent
establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder, (ii) in the case of a Non-U.S.
Holder who is a non-resident alien individual who holds the shares of Non-Voting
Common as a capital asset, such holder is present in the U.S. for a period
aggregating 183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition, and either
(a) such Non-U.S. Holder has a "tax home" (as specifically defined for U.S.
federal income tax purposes) in the U.S. (unless the gain from the disposition
is attributable to an office or other fixed place of business maintained by such
Non-U.S. Holder in a foreign country and a foreign tax equal to at least 10% of
such gain has been paid to a foreign country), or (b) the gain from the
disposition is attributable to an office or other fixed place of business
maintained by such Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S., (iii) the Non-U.S. Holder is
subject to tax pursuant to the provisions of U.S. tax law applicable to certain
U.S. expatriates, or (iv) RGA is or has been a "U.S. real property holding
corporation" for federal income tax purposes (which RGA does not believe that it
is or is likely to become) and, assuming that the Non-Voting Common is deemed
for tax purposes to be "regularly traded on an established securities market,"
the Non-U.S. Holder held, at any time during the five-year period ending on the
date of disposition (or such shorter period that such shares were held),
directly or indirectly, more than five percent of the Non-Voting Common.
Non-U.S. Holders should consult applicable tax treaties, which might result in a
U.S. federal income tax treatment on the sale or other disposition of Non-Voting
Common different than as described above.
BACKUP WITHHOLDING AND INFORMATION REPORTING
Dividends on Non-Voting Common. RGA must report annually to the IRS and to
each Non-U.S. Holder the amount of dividends paid to and the tax withheld, if
any, with respect to such holder. These information reporting requirements apply
regardless of whether withholding was reduced by an applicable tax treaty or if
withholding was not required because the dividends were effectively connected
with a trade or business in the U.S. of the Non-U.S. Holder. Copies of these
information returns may also be available under the provisions of a specific
treaty or agreement with the tax authorities in the country in which the
Non-U.S. Holder resides. Dividends paid on or before December 31, 1999 to a
holder at an address outside the U.S. (unless RGA has knowledge that the holder
is a U.S. person) or dividends paid on or before December 31, 1999 that are
subject to U.S. withholding tax at the 30% statutory rate or at a reduced tax
treaty rate, and dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business in the U.S. (if certain certification and disclosure
requirements are met) will generally not be subject to backup withholding of
U.S. federal income tax or information reporting. In general, backup withholding
at a rate of 31% and information reporting will apply to other dividends paid on
or before December 31, 1999 on shares of Non-Voting Common to holders that are
not "exempt recipients", as defined in the Treasury Regulations, and fail to
provide to RGA in the manner required, certain identifying information (such as
the holder's name, address and taxpayer identification number). Generally,
individuals are not exempt recipients. For dividends paid after December 31,
1999, the Final Regulations provide certain presumptions and other rules under
which Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to backup withholding and related
information reporting in the absence of required certifications.
59
62
Dispositions of Non-Voting Common. The payment of the proceeds from the
disposition of shares of Non-Voting Common by or through the U.S. office of a
broker will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding at a rate
of 31% unless the holder, under penalties of perjury, certifies, among other
things, its status as a Non-U.S. Holder, or otherwise establishes an exemption.
Generally, the payment of the proceeds from the disposition of shares of
Non-Voting Common outside the U.S. by or through a non-U.S. office of a broker
will not be subject to backup withholding and will not be subject to information
reporting. In the case of the payment of proceeds from the disposition of shares
of Non-Voting Common outside the U.S. by or through a non-U.S. office of a
broker that is a U.S. person or a "U.S.-related person", existing regulations
require information reporting (but not backup withholding) on the payment unless
the broker receives a statement from the owner, signed under penalties of
perjury, certifying, among other things, its status as a Non-U.S. Holder, or the
broker has documentary evidence in its files that the owner is a Non-U.S.
Holder, the broker has no actual knowledge to the contrary and certain other
requirements are satisfied. For tax purposes, a "U.S.-related person" is (i) a
"controlled foreign corporation" for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (ii) a
foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from all sources for the
three-year period ending with the close of its taxable year preceding the
payment (or for such part of the period that the broker has been in existence)
is derived from activities that are effectively connected with the conduct of a
U.S. trade or business, or (iii) effective after December 31, 1999, certain
brokers that are foreign partnerships with U.S. partners or that are engaged in
a U.S. trade or business. For proceeds from the disposition of Non-Voting Common
after December 31, 1999, the Final Regulations provide more detailed rules
concerning such documentation.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from a
payment to a Non-U.S. Holder under the backup withholding rules will be allowed
as a credit against such holder's U.S. federal income tax liability and may
entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the required information is
furnished to the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors
regarding the application of these rules to their particular situations, the
availability of an exemption therefrom and the procedures for obtaining such an
exemption, if available.
60
63
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Underwriting Agreement among RGA
and A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities
Corporation, Chase Securities Inc. and Conning & Company, as the representatives
for the several underwriters (the "Representatives"), RGA has agreed to sell to
the underwriters named below (the "Underwriters"), and the Underwriters have
severally agreed to purchase from RGA, the respective number of shares of
Non-Voting Common set forth opposite their respective names below:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
NON-VOTING
UNDERWRITER COMMON
----------- ----------
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc....................................
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation.........
Chase Securities Inc........................................
Conning & Company...........................................
---------
Total............................................. 5,300,000
=========
Under the terms and conditions of the Underwriting Agreement, the
Underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the shares of Non-Voting
Common offered hereby, if any are taken.
The Underwriters propose to offer the shares of Non-Voting Common in part
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page
of this Prospectus and in part to certain securities dealers at such price less
a concession of $ per share. The Underwriters may allow, and such dealers
may reallow, a concession not in excess of $ per share to certain other
brokers and dealers. After the shares of Non-Voting Common are released for sale
to the public, the offering price and the selling terms may from time to time be
varied by the Representatives.
The Company has granted the Underwriters an option exercisable for 30 days
after the date of this Prospectus to purchase up to an aggregate of 795,000
additional shares of Non-Voting Common solely to cover over-allotments, if any.
If the Underwriters exercise their over-allotment option, the Underwriters have
severally agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the
same percentage thereof that the number of shares to be purchased by each of
them, as shown in the foregoing table, bears to the 5,300,000 shares of
Non-Voting Common offered hereby and the Company will be obligated, pursuant to
the option to sell such shares to the Underwriters.
RGA, one of its directors and GenAmerica Corporation have agreed to enter
into lock-up agreements pursuant to which they will agree that they will not,
for 90 days, 45 days and 90 days, respectively, from and after the date of this
Prospectus, sell, offer to sell, or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of capital stock of RGA (other than shares issuable
pursuant to a plan for employees or shareholders in effect on the date of this
Prospectus, and Voting Common issuable on conversion of securities or exercise
of warrants or options outstanding on the date of this Prospectus) without the
prior written consent of A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
Prior to the Offering, there has been no public market for the Non-Voting
Common. The price of the shares of Non-Voting Common has been negotiated between
RGA and the Representatives. In addition to prevailing market conditions, among
the factors considered in determining the offering price of the shares of
Non-Voting Common were the trading history and price of RGA's Voting Common, the
Company's historical financial performance, estimates of the business potential
and earning prospects of the Company, an assessment of the Company's management
and the consideration of the above factors in relation to the market valuations
of companies in similar business.
The Representatives have informed RGA that the Underwriters do not intend
to confirm sales to any accounts over which they exercise discretionary
authority.
61
64
In connection with the Offering, the Underwriters and selling group members
and their respective affiliates may engage in transactions that stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the Non-Voting Common or Voting
Common. These transactions may include over-allotment and stabilizing
transactions and purchases, effected in accordance with Rule 104 of Regulation
M, to cover short positions created by the Underwriters in connection with the
Offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of certain bids or purchases for the
purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the
Non-Voting Common or Voting Common; and short positions created by the
Underwriters involve the sale by the Underwriters of a greater number of shares
of Non-Voting Common or Voting Common than they are required to purchase from
RGA in the Offering. The Underwriters also may impose a penalty bid, whereby
selling concessions allowed to broker-dealers in respect of the Non-Voting
Common or Voting Common sold in the Offering may be reclaimed by the
Underwriters if such Non-Voting Common or Voting Common is repurchased by the
Underwriters in stabilizing or covering transactions. These activities may
stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the Non-Voting
Common or Voting Common, which may be higher than the price that might otherwise
prevail in the open market, and these activities, if commenced, may be
discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected on the NYSE, in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise.
RGA has agreed to indemnify the several Underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to
payments the Underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof.
Conning & Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Conning Corporation,
which is an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of General American. Conning
Asset Management Company, which is a subsidiary of Conning & Company, provides
asset management and mortgage origination services for the Company. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis -- Investments" and "Business -- Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions." Certain of the Underwriters and their
affiliates have, from time to time, performed investment and commercial banking
and other services for the Company and GenAmerica or their affiliates in the
ordinary course of business and have received fees in connection therewith.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Non-Voting Common being offered hereby will be passed
upon for RGA by Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, L.C., St. Louis, Missouri, and by James
E. Sherman, Esq., General Counsel and Secretary of RGA, and certain legal
matters related to the Offering will be passed upon for the Underwriters by
Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, Missouri. Mr. Sherman is also an employee and
Associate General Counsel of General American and is an officer and/or a member
of the Board of Directors of various of RGA's subsidiaries. A member of Bryan
Cave LLP serves as a director of GenAmerica Corporation and General American.
Bryan Cave LLP has, from time to time, served as counsel to General American and
certain of its affiliates including the Company.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedules of the Company
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997 have been audited by KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent
certified public accountants, as set forth in their reports thereon included
therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial
statements and schedules are incorporated by reference in reliance upon such
reports given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
RGA is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and,
in accordance therewith, files reports, proxy statements and other information
with the Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information can be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the
Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549
and at the Commission's Regional Offices
62
65
located at Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10048 and
Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the
Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549,
at prescribed rates. The Commission maintains a web site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants
that file electronically with the Commission. Such reports, proxy and
information statements and other information may be found on the Commission's
web site address, http://www.sec.gov. Such reports, proxy statements and
information also can be inspected at the office of the NYSE, 20 Broad Street,
New York, New York 10005.
This Prospectus constitutes a part of a Registration Statement on Form S-3
(together with all amendments and exhibits, referred to herein as the
"Registration Statement") filed by the Company with the Commission under the
Securities Act with respect to the Non-Voting Common being offered hereby. This
Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration
Statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto, certain parts of which are
omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. For further
information with respect to the Company and the Non-Voting Common being offered
hereby, reference is made to the Registration Statement which can be inspected
at the public reference facilities at the offices of the Commission set forth
above. Any statements contained herein concerning the provision of any document
filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement or otherwise filed with the
Commission or incorporated by reference herein are not necessarily complete,
and, in each instance, reference is made to the copy of such document so filed
for a more complete description of the matter involved. Each such reference is
qualified in its entirety by such reference.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed by RGA (File No. 1-11848) with the Commission
pursuant to the Exchange Act are incorporated by reference herein and made a
part hereof: (1) RGA's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, as amended on Form 10-K/A-1 filed with the Commission on
April 8, 1998, (2) the description of Non-Voting Common contained in RGA's
Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on May , 1998,
including any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating such
description, and (3) the description of the preferred stock purchase rights
contained in RGA's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission
on April 7, 1993, as amended on Form 8-A/A filed with the Commission on April
28, 1993, including any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating
such description.
All documents filed by RGA with the Commission pursuant to Section 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the date of this Prospectus
and prior to the termination of this Offering of the Non-Voting Common shall be
deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and to be a part
hereof from the date of filing of such documents, unless any such document shall
expressly state that it is not to be incorporated by reference. Any statement
contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference
herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this
Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein (or in any other
subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by
reference herein) modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so
modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded,
to constitute a part of this Prospectus or any amendment or supplement hereto.
RGA undertakes to provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of
this Prospectus is delivered, upon the written or oral request of such person, a
copy of any or all of the documents incorporated herein by reference, other than
exhibits to such documents unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by
reference into such documents. Requests for such documents should be directed
to: Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated, 660 Mason Ridge Center Drive,
St. Louis, Missouri 63141-8557, Attention Jack B. Lay, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, telephone number (314) 453-7300.
63
66
======================================================
NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY
REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS, AND, IF GIVEN OR
MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN
AUTHORIZED. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES OTHER THAN THE SECURITIES TO
WHICH IT RELATES OR AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SUCH
SECURITIES IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS UNLAWFUL.
NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER
ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE
AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO ITS DATE.
------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Forward Looking Statements............. 1
Prospectus Summary..................... 3
Risk Factors........................... 9
Use of Proceeds........................ 10
Price Range of Capital Stock and
Dividends............................ 10
Capitalization......................... 11
Selected Consolidated Financial Data... 12
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations........................... 13
Business............................... 28
Management............................. 44
Principal Stockholders................. 47
Description of Capital Stock........... 48
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders
of Non-Voting Common................. 58
Underwriting........................... 61
Legal Matters.......................... 62
Experts................................ 62
Available Information.................. 62
Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference............................ 63
======================================================
======================================================
5,300,000 SHARES
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
RGA LOGO
NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK
------------------------
PROSPECTUS
, 1998
------------------------
A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC.
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE
SECURITIES CORPORATION
CHASE SECURITIES INC.
CONNING & COMPANY
======================================================
67
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
SEC Registration Fee........................................ $ 93,293.75
NASD Filing Fee............................................. 30,500.00
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Listing Fee................... 56,463.00
Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses....................
Accounting Fees and Expenses................................ 100,000.00
Legal Fees and Expenses..................................... 125,000.00
Printing and Engraving Expenses.............................
Transfer and Registrar Fees................................. 1,500.00
Miscellaneous...............................................
-----------
Total............................................. $
===========
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Section 351.355(1) of the Revised Statutes of Missouri provides that a
corporation may indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation in any action, suit or proceeding other than an action by or in the
right of the corporation, against expenses (including attorney's fees),
judgments, fines and settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred by him
in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and
in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests
of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action, had no reasonable
cause to believe his contact was unlawful. Section 351.355(2) provides that the
corporation may indemnify any such person in any action or suit by or in the
right of the corporation against expenses (including attorneys' fees) and
settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with
the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in
a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of
the corporation, except that he may not be indemnified in respect of any matter
in which he has been adjudged liable for negligence or misconduct in the
performance of his duty to the corporation, unless authorized by the court.
Section 351.355(3) provides that a corporation may indemnify any such person
against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by
him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he has been successful
in defense of such action, suit or proceeding and if such action, suit or
proceeding is one for which the corporation may indemnify him under Section
351.355(1) or (2). Section 351.355(7) provides that a corporation shall have the
power to give any further indemnity to any such person, in addition to the
indemnity otherwise authorized under Section 351.355, provided such further
indemnity is either (i) authorized, directed or provided for in the articles of
incorporation of the corporation or any duly adopted amendment thereof or (ii)
is authorized, directed or provided for in any by-law or agreement of the
corporation which has been adopted by a vote of the stockholders of the
corporation, provided that no such indemnity shall indemnify any person from or
on account of such person's conduct which was finally adjudged to have been
knowingly fraudulent, deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct.
The Restated Articles of Incorporation of RGA filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this
Registration Statement contain provisions indemnifying its directors, officers,
employees and agents to the extent authorized specifically by Sections
351.355(1), (2) (3) and (7). RGA has entered into indemnification contracts with
the officers and directors of RGA. The contracts provide that RGA under certain
circumstances may self-insure against directors' and officers' liabilities now
insured under the policy of insurance referred to below and will provide
indemnity to the fullest extent permitted by law against all expenses (including
attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts, paid or incurred in
any action or proceeding, including any act on behalf of RGA, on account of
their service as a director or officer of RGA, any subsidiary of RGA or any
other company or enterprise when they are serving in such capacities at the
request of RGA, excepting only cases
II-1
68
where the conduct of such person is adjudged to be knowingly fraudulent,
deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct.
Directors or officers of RGA who are directors or officers of General
American may also be entitled to indemnification under the provisions of an
agreement with General American providing indemnification to them since they
serve, at General American's request, as directors or officers of RGA. Such
individuals may also be covered by General American's directors' and officers'
liability insurance policy.
The form of Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
Registration Statement provides for the mutual indemnification of RGA and any
Underwriters, their respective controlling persons, directors and certain of
their officers, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
General American maintains a policy of insurance under which the directors
and officers of RGA are insured, subject to the limits of the policy, against
certain losses, as defined in the policy, arising from claims made against such
directors and officers by reason of any wrongful acts, as defined in the policy,
in their respective capacities as directors or officers.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
See Index to Exhibits.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, (the "Securities Act") may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the provisions
described under "Item 15 -- Indemnification of Directors and Officers" above, or
otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Commission
such indemnification against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Company in
the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been sealed by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The Company hereby undertakes: (1) That for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule
430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Company pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be
part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective;
(2) That for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed
to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein,
and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the
initial bona fide offering thereof; (3) That for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act, each filing of the Company's annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act") (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee
benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act) that
is incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof; and (4) To deliver or cause to be delivered with the
prospectus, to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest
annual report, to security holders that is incorporated by reference in the
prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the requirements of Rule 14a-3
or Rule 14c-3 under the Exchange Act; and, where interim financial information
required to be presented by Article 3 of Regulation S-X is not set forth in the
prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be delivered to each person to whom the
prospectus is sent or given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically
incorporated by reference in the prospectus to provide such interim financial
information.
II-2
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
undersigned registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that
it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, on April 29,
1998.
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED
By: /s/ A. GREIG WOODRING
------------------------------------
A. Greig Woodring
Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby appoints Jack B. Lay and
James E. Sherman, and each of them, severally, his true and lawful attorneys and
agents to execute in his name, place and stead (individually and in any capacity
stated below) any and all amendments to this Registration Statement (and any
additional registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the same offering contemplated by this
Registration Statement) and all instruments necessary or advisable in connection
therewith and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each
of said attorneys and agents to have power to act with or without the others and
to have full power and authority to do and to perform in the name and on behalf
of each of the undersigned every act whatsoever necessary or advisable to be
done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as any of he
undersigned might or could do in person.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME TITLE/POSITION DATE
---- -------------- ----
/s/ RICHARD A. LIDDY Chairman of the Board of Directors May 1, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
Richard A. Liddy
/s/ A. GREIG WOODRING President, Chief Executive Officer and April 29, 1998
- ------------------------------------------ Director (principal executive officer)
A. Greig Woodring
/s/ JACK B. LAY Executive Vice President, Chief Financial May 4, 1998
- ------------------------------------------ Officer and Director (principal financial
Jack B. Lay and accounting officer)
/s/ J. CLIFF EASON Director May 1, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
J. Cliff Eason
/s/ BERNARD A. EDISON Director April 29, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
Bernard A. Edison
/s/ STUART GREENBAUM Director April 29, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
Stuart Greenbaum
II-3
70
NAME TITLE/POSITION DATE
---- -------------- ----
/s/ WILLIAM A. PECK Director April 29, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
William A. Peck
/s/ LEONARD M. RUBENSTEIN Director April 29, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
Leonard M. Rubenstein
/s/ WILLIAM P. STIRITZ Director April 30, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
William P. Stiritz
/s/ H. EDWIN TRUSHEIM Director April 28, 1998
- ------------------------------------------
H. Edwin Trusheim
II-4
71
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
NUMBER EXHIBIT
- ------ -------
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement.*
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Reinsurance Group of
America, Incorporated, incorporated herein by reference to
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-58960) filed on
March 2, 1993.
3.2 Bylaws of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated,
incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (No. 33-58960) filed on March 2, 1993.
3.3 Form of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated.
4.1 Form of Specimen Certificate for Non-Voting Common for
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated.
4.2 Rights Agreement, as amended, dated as of May 4, 1993,
between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and
Boatmen's Trust Company, as Rights Agent, incorporated
herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1997 (No. 1-11848) filed on May 21,
1997.
4.3 Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22,
1998, between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and
Chase Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. (as successor to
Boatmen's Trust Company), as Rights Agent.
5.1 Opinion of Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, L.C.
23.1 Consent of Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, L.C. (included as part of
Exhibit 5.1).
23.2 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
24.1 Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereof).
- -------------------------
* To be filed by pre-effective amendment.
1
EXHIBIT 3.3
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE THREE OF THE
RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
----------------------------------
ARTICLE THREE
CAPITAL STOCK
A. Class and Number of Shares. The aggregate number, class and par value,
if any, of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue
is 105,000,000 shares, consisting of 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
par value $.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares of Non-Voting Common Stock,
par value $.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par
value $.01 per share ($1,050,000.00 aggregate total), subject to
adjustment pursuant to subdivision B.4.(c) hereof.
B. Rights of the Common Stock and the Non-Voting Common Stock.
1. General. The powers, preferences and rights of the Common
Stock and the Non-Voting Common Stock, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, shall be in all respects
identical, except as otherwise required by law or expressly
provided in this Article Three.
2. Voting. Each holder of the Common Stock shall be entitled to
one vote per share of Common Stock on all matters to be voted
on by the shareholders. Except as otherwise required by law,
no holder of the Non-Voting Common Stock (by virtue of
ownership of such shares) shall be entitled to vote such
shares of Non-Voting Common Stock on any matters to be voted
on by the shareholders of the Corporation.
3. Dividends; Splits or Combinations. Dividends may be declared
and paid to the holders of the Common Stock and the holders of
the Non-Voting Common Stock in cash, property, or other
securities of the Corporation out of any funds or other assets
of the Corporation legally available therefor. If and when
dividends on the Common Stock and the Non-Voting Common Stock
are declared payable from time to time by the Board of
Directors, whether payable in cash, in property or in shares
of stock of the Corporation, the holders shall be entitled to
share equally, on a per share basis, in such dividends, except
that (a) dividends or other distributions payable in shares of
the Corporation shall be made to all holders of Common Stock
and Non-Voting Common Stock and shall be made only (i) in
shares of Non-Voting Common Stock to the record holders of
Common Stock and to the record holders of Non-Voting Common
2
Stock, (ii) in shares of Common Stock to the record holders of
Common Stock and in shares of Non-Voting Common Stock to the
record holders of Non-Voting Common Stock, or (iii) in any
other authorized class or series of capital stock to the
record holders of both classes of Common Stock and Non-Voting
Common Stock, regardless of the fair market value of such
shares received in payment of such dividend or other
distribution, and (b)(i) dividends or other distributions
payable on the Common Stock and Non-Voting Common Stock in
convertible securities or securities giving the holder a right
to acquire shares of Common Stock or Non-Voting Common Stock
("Options"), other than rights issued pursuant to shareholder
rights plans of the type entitling holders of rights other
than an "acquiring person" to purchase shares or other
securities at a below-market price if certain events occur
(which rights may be distributed as a dividend pursuant to
such a plan upon shares of either class of Common Stock or
Non-Voting Common Stock without a corresponding dividend
distribution upon shares of the other), shall be made to all
holders of Common Stock and Non-Voting Common Stock and may be
made (1) in securities convertible into Common Stock or
Options to acquire Common Stock to the record holders of
Common Stock and to record holders of Non-Voting Common Stock,
or (2) in securities convertible into Common Stock or Options
to acquire Common Stock to the record holders of Common Stock
and in securities convertible into Non-Voting Common Stock and
Options to acquire Non-Voting Common Stock to the record
holders of the Non-Voting Common Stock. If the Corporation
shall in any manner split, subdivide or combine the
outstanding shares of Common Stock or Non-Voting Common Stock,
the outstanding shares of the other such class shall be
proportionally split, subdivided or combined in the same
manner and on the same basis as the outstanding shares of the
other class have been split, subdivided or combined.
4. Conversion.
(a) All outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common Stock
shall be automatically converted into shares of
Common Stock on a share-for-share basis if, as a
result of the existence of the Non-Voting Common
Stock, either the Common Stock or the Non-Voting
Common Stock is (or both are) excluded from or
ineligible for trading on the New York Stock
Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and all other
principal national securities exchanges then in use
and is also excluded from quotation on The Nasdaq
Stock Market's National Market ("NASDAQ") and any
other comparable national quotation system then in
use.
(b) All outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common Stock
shall be automatically converted into shares of
Common Stock on a share-for-share basis if at any
time the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock
as reflected on the stock transfer records of the
Corporation falls below 10% of the aggregate number
of outstanding shares of Common
3
Stock and Non-Voting Common Stock reflected on
the stock transfer records. For purposes of the
immediately preceding sentence, any shares of Common
Stock or Non-Voting Common Stock repurchased by the
Corporation shall no longer be deemed "outstanding"
from and after the date of repurchase.
(c) In the event of any conversion of the Non-Voting
Stock pursuant to subdivision B.4.(a) or B.4.(b),
certificates which formerly represented outstanding
shares of Non-Voting Common Stock shall thereafter be
deemed to represent a like number of shares of Common
Stock and all authorized shares of Common Stock and
Non-Voting Common Stock shall consist of only Common
Stock.
5. Business Combinations; Dissolution. In the event of merger,
consolidation, combination or similar transaction of the
Corporation with another entity (whether or not the
Corporation is the surviving entity) or in the event of
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation,
holders of Non-Voting Common Stock shall be entitled to
receive in respect of each share of Non-Voting Common Stock
the same kind, and at the same ratio, of shares, evidences of
indebtedness, other securities, cash, rights, or any other
property, or any combination of shares, evidence of
indebtedness, securities, cash, rights, or any other property
as holders of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive in
respect of each share, except that in any merger,
consolidation, combination or similar transaction any common
stock that holders of Non-Voting Common Stock shall be
entitled to receive in any such event may have terms
substantially similar to those of the Non-Voting Common Stock
set forth in this Article Three.
6. Non-Voting Common Stock Protections.
(a) A "Person," as defined in subdivision B.6.(f) hereof,
who after May 27, 1998, acquires "beneficial
ownership", as defined herein, of any shares of
Common Stock may not exercise the voting power of
that number of the shares of Common Stock so acquired
that are deemed to be excess shares of Common Stock
for purposes of this subdivision B.6.(a). An
acquisition of beneficial ownership of shares of
Common Stock hereunder by any Person shall be deemed
to include any shares of Common Stock that a Person
acquires beneficial ownership of, directly or
indirectly, in one transaction or in a series of
transactions, or with respect to which the Person
acts or agrees to act in concert with any other
Person or any shares which are deemed to be
beneficially owned by any "group," as defined in
subdivision B.6.(f), of which such Person is a
member. The number of shares of Common Stock deemed
hereunder to be excess shares of Common Stock shall
be equal to the amount determined by application of
the following formula:
4
(I) the percentage which the number of shares of
Common Stock acquired or deemed to be
acquired by the Person after May 27, 1998,
bears to the aggregate number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock;
(II) minus 15%;
(III) minus the percentage which the number of
shares of Non-Voting Common Stock acquired
or deemed to be acquired at an "equitable
price" (as defined in subdivision B.6(b)) by
that Person bears to the aggregate number of
outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common
Stock;
(IV) times the aggregate number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock.
For purposes of this determination, any shares of
Common Stock or Non-Voting Common Stock repurchased
by the Corporation since the last date on which a
Person acquired any shares of Common Stock or
Non-Voting Common Stock (whether in treasury or
retired) shall be deemed still to be outstanding.
Determinations of excess shares of Common Stock shall
be made as of the date that a Person, directly or
indirectly, alone or with others, otherwise would
seek to exercise or direct the exercise of voting
power with respect to those shares of Common Stock.
(b) Shares of Non-Voting Common Stock shall have been
acquired at an equitable price for purposes of this
subdivision B.6 only if they were acquired at a price
at least equal to the higher of:
(I) the highest per share price (including any
brokerage commissions, transfer taxes and
soliciting dealers' fees) paid by the
acquiring Person for any shares of Common
Stock acquired by that Person within either
60 days before or 60 days after the shares
of Non-Voting Common Stock were acquired; or
(II) the highest closing sale price
during the 30-day period immediately before
the shares of Non-Voting Common Stock were
acquired of a share of Common Stock on the
Composite Tape for New York Stock
Exchange-Listed Stocks, or, if the shares
of Common Stock are not quoted on the
Composite Tape, on the New York Stock
Exchange, or, if the shares of Common Stock
are not listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, on the principal United States
national securities exchange on which the
shares of Common Stock are listed, or, if
the shares of Common Stock are not listed
on any United States national securities
exchange, the highest closing bid
5
quotation for a share of Common Stock
during the 30-day period on NASDAQ or any
system in use, or, if no quotations are
available, the fair market value during the
30-day period of a share of Common Stock as
determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation.
If any of the consideration given by the
Person for any shares of Common Stock under
subclause (I) of this subdivision B.6.(b)
was other than cash, the value of such
non-cash consideration shall be as
determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation.
(c) An acquisition of a share of Common Stock shall not
include for the purposes of clause (a) of this
subdivision B.6 an acquisition:
(I) of shares made pursuant to a contract
existing on or before May 27, 1998; or
(II) of shares by bequest or inheritance, by
operation of law upon the death of any
individual, or by any other transfer without
valuable consideration, including a gift
that is made in good faith and not for the
purpose of circumventing this subdivision
B.6; or
(III) of shares acquired upon issuance or sale by
the Corporation; or
(IV) of shares acquired by operation of law
(including a merger or consolidation
effected for the purpose of recapitalizing
any Person, including the Corporation, or
reincorporating any Person, including the
Corporation, in another jurisdiction but
excluding a merger or consolidation effected
for the purpose of acquiring another
Person); or
(V) of shares acquired by a plan of the
Corporation qualified under Section 401(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or any successor provision thereto,
or acquired by reason of a distribution from
such a plan.
(d) Unless there are affirmative attributes of concerted
action, acting or agreeing to act in concert with any
other Person shall not include for purposes of clause
(a) of this subdivision B.6 actions taken or agreed
to be taken by Persons acting in their official
capacities as directors or officers of the
Corporation or actions by Persons related by blood or
marriage.
(e) To the extent that the voting power of any share of
Common Stock cannot be exercised pursuant to this
subdivision B.6, that share of
6
Common Stock shall not be included in the
determination of the voting power of the Corporation
for any purpose under these Restated Articles of
Incorporation or the General and Business
Corporation Law of Missouri.
(f) The term "Person", as used in this subdivision B.6
shall mean any natural person, company, government,
or political subdivision, agency or instrumentality
of a government or other entity, and the term "group"
shall mean a group as described in Rule 13d-5
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "'34 Act"), or any successor
regulation, and the formation of a group hereunder
shall have the effect described in paragraph (b) of
said Rule 13d-5 or any successor regulation. For
purposes of this subdivision B.6, "beneficial
ownership" shall be determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the 1934 Act or any
successor regulation.
(g) Anything in this subdivision B.6 to the contrary
notwithstanding, in no event shall the provisions of
this subdivision B.6 apply to transfers of Common
Stock from General American Mutual Holding Company, a
Missouri corporation ("GAMHC"), or any direct or
indirect subsidiary of GAMHC, to GAMHC, or any direct
or indirect subsidiary of GAMHC.
7. Repurchases. The Board of Directors shall have the power to
authorize the Corporation to purchase or otherwise acquire
from time to time shares of any class of stock herein or
hereafter authorized from such persons, firms, associations or
corporations, in such manner and on such terms and for such
consideration as the Board of Directors shall from time to
time, in its discretion, determine, whether or not less
consideration could be paid upon the purchase of the same
number of shares of another class, and as otherwise permitted
by law.
8. Issuances. The Board of Directors shall have the power to
authorize the Corporation to issue and sell all or any part of
any class of stock herein or hereafter authorized, from time
to time, and at such time or times, in such amounts and manner
to such persons, firms, associations or corporations, and for
such consideration, whether in cash, property or otherwise, as
the Board of Directors shall from time to time, in its
discretion, determine, whether or not greater consideration
could be received upon the issue or sale of the same number of
shares of another class, and as otherwise permitted by law.
C. Issuance of Preferred Stock, Rights and Preferences Thereof.
1. The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or
more series, with such voting powers, full or limited, or no
voting powers, and such designations, preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special
7
rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions
thereof, as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions
providing for the issuance of such stock adopted from time to
time by the Board of Directors. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in the resolution or resolutions
providing for the issuance of such shares of each particular
series of Preferred Stock, subject to the requirements of the
laws of the State of Missouri, the Board of Directors is also
expressly authorized:
(a) To fix the distinctive serial designation of the
shares of the series;
(b) To fix the consideration for which the shares of the
series are to be issued;
(c) To fix the rate or amount per annum, if any, at which
the holders of the shares of the series shall be
entitled to receive dividends, the dates on which and
the conditions under which dividends shall be
payable, whether dividends shall be cumulative or
noncumulative, and if cumulative, the date or dates
from which dividends shall be cumulative;
(d) To fix the price or prices at which, the times during
which, and the other terms, if any, upon which the
shares of the series may be redeemed;
(e) To fix the rights, if any, which the holders of
shares of the series have in the event of dissolution
or upon distribution of the assets of the
Corporation;
(f) From time to time to include additional shares of
Preferred Stock which the Corporation is authorized
to issue in the series;
(g) To determine whether or not the shares of the series
shall be made convertible into or exchangeable for
other securities of the Corporation, including shares
of the Common Stock of the Corporation or shares of
any other series of the Preferred Stock of the
Corporation, now or hereafter authorized, or any new
class of Preferred Stock of the Corporation hereafter
authorized, the price or prices or the rate or rates
at which conversion or exchange may be made, and the
terms and conditions upon which the conversion or
exchange right shall be exercised;
(h) To determine if a sinking fund shall be provided for
the purchase or redemption of shares of the series
and, if so, to fix the terms and the amount or
amounts of the sinking fund; and
(i) To fix the other preferences and rights, privileges
and restrictions applicable to the series as may be
permitted by law.
1
EXHIBIT 4.1
RGA
NUMBER REINSURANCE
GROUP OF AMERICA,
_________ INCORPORATED
$.01 PAR VALUE SHARES
------------------
SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN
THE CITIES OF ST. LOUIS AND NEW YORK INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
CUSIP 759351 20 8
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
IS THE OWNER OF
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK OF
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed.
This certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby, are issued
and shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation and ByLaws of the Corporation, and all amendments thereto, copies
of which are on file at the office of the Transfer Agent, to all of which the
holder, by accepting this certificate, assents.
This certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by
the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the
Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
officers.
Dated:
--------------------------
President
Countersigned and Registered:
Transfer Agent and Registrar
--------------------------
Treasurer
By
Authorized Signature
2
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
THE NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK OF REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED (THE "COMPANY") EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT ENTITLED TO
ANY VOTING RIGHTS EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW. THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT
CHARGE, TO EACH SHAREHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS,
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL
RIGHTS, AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES
AND/OR RIGHTS, OF THE NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK AND OF EACH OTHER CLASS OF STOCK,
OR SERIES THEREOF, WHICH THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE. ANY SUCH REQUEST IS
TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED
ON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE.
This certificate also evidences and entitles the holder hereof to
certain Rights as set forth in a Rights Agreement between the Company and
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., dated as of May 4, 1993, as amended as
of July 26, 1995 and _________, 1998 (the "Rights Agreement"), as it may from
time to time be supplemented or further amended, the terms of which are
incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is on file at the principal
executive offices of the Company. Under certain circumstances, as set forth in
the Rights Agreement, such Rights may be redeemed, expire, exchanged or be
evidenced by separate certificates and no longer be evidenced by this
certificate. The Company will mail to the holder of this certificate a copy of
the Rights Agreement without charge within five days after receipt of a written
request therefor. Under certain circumstances, Rights issued to or held by
Acquiring Persons or their Affiliates or Associates (as defined in the Rights
Agreement) and any subsequent holder of such Rights may become null and void.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM-as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian UNIF TRAN MIN ACT- Custodian
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
TEN ENT-as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) (Cust) (Minor)
JT TEN -as joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts to Minors under Uniform Transfers to Minors
survivorship and not as tenants in common Act Act
----------- ------------
(State) (State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
-----------
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
- -------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
Attorney to
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
--------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH
THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR
ANY CHANGE WHATEVER
1
EXHIBIT 4.3
SECOND AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to Rights Agreement ("Amendment"), dated as of
April 22, 1998 is entered into between REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED, a Missouri corporation (the "Company") and CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER
SERVICES, L.L.C., a New Jersey limited liability company (the "Rights Agent").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, The Company and Boatmen's Trust Company (as predecessor to the
Rights Agent), were parties to that certain Rights Agreement dated as of May 4,
1993, as amended by that certain amendment dated as of July 26, 1995 (the
"Rights Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. has succeeded to the
interests of Boatmen's Trust Company as Rights Agent under the Rights Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, Section 27 of the Rights Agreement provides that the Company
may from time to time amend the Rights Agreement without the approval of any
holders of Right Certificates (as defined in the Rights Agreement) in order to
cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision contained therein
which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provisions therein, or to
make any other provisions or amendments thereto which the Company may deem
necessary or desirable; and
WHEREAS, In connection with the amendment of the Company's Restated
Articles of Incorporation to authorize a new class of Non-Voting Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the "Non-Voting Common Stock"), the Company wishes to
amend the Rights Agreement to provide that the terms and provisions of the
Rights Agreement, shall extend to the holders of the Non-Voting Common Stock;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
agreements herein set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Section 1(g) of the Rights Agreement is revised to read in its
entirety as follows:
(g) "Common Stock" or "Common Shares" shall mean either or
both the Voting Common Stock or the Non-Voting Common Stock,
as the context in which such term is used may require, except
that "Common Stock" when used with reference to any Person
other than the Company shall mean the capital stock with the
greatest Voting Power of such Person or the equity securities
or other equity interest having power to control or direct the
management of such Person or, if such Person is a Subsidiary
(as hereinafter defined) of another Person, of the Person
which ultimately controls such first-mentioned Person and
which has issued and outstanding such capital stock, equity
securities or equity interests.
2
2. Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is further revised to add
the following subsections at the end thereof:
(t) "Non-Voting Common Stock" shall mean the Non-Voting Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company.
(u) "Voting Common Stock" shall mean the Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share, of the Company.
3. Section 11(b) of the Rights Agreement is revised to read in
its entirety as follows:
(b) In the event any Person shall become an Acquiring Person
("Section 11(b) Event"), then proper provision shall be made
so that each holder of a Right, subject to Section 7(e) and
Section 24 hereof and except as provided below, shall after
the later of the occurrence of such event and the effective
date of an appropriate registration statement pursuant to
Section 9 hereof, have a right to receive, upon exercise
thereof at the then current Purchase Price multiplied by the
then number of one one-hundred and fiftieths of a share of
Preferred Stock for which a Right is then exercisable in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement, in lieu of shares
of Preferred Stock, such number of shares of Voting Common
Stock of the Company as shall equal the result obtained by (y)
multiplying the then current Purchase Price by the then number
of one one-hundred and fiftieths of a share of Preferred Stock
for which a Right is then exercisable and dividing that
product by (z) 50% of the current market price per one share
of Voting Common Stock (determined pursuant to Section 11(f)
hereof on the date of the occurrence of the Section 11(b)
Event) (such number of shares being referred to as the "number
of Adjustment Shares").
4. Section 11(c) of the Rights Agreement is revised to read in
its entirety as follows:
(c) In the event that there shall not be sufficient Treasury
shares or authorized but unissued shares of Voting Common
Stock to permit the exercise in full of the Rights in
accordance with the foregoing Section 11(b), and the Rights
become so exercisable, notwithstanding any other provision of
this Agreement, to the extent necessary and permitted by
applicable law and any agreements in effect on the date hereof
to which the Company is a party, each Right shall thereafter
represent the right to receive, upon exercise thereof at the
then current Purchase Price multiplied by the then number of
one one-hundred and fiftieth of a share of Preferred Stock for
which a Right is then exercisable in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement, a number of shares, or units of shares, of
(y) Voting Common Stock, and (z) preferred stock (or other
equity securities) of the Company, including, but not limited
to Preferred Stock, equal in the aggregate to the number of
Adjustment Shares where the Board of Directors shall have in
good faith deemed such shares or units, other than the shares
of Voting Common Stock, to have at least the same value and
2
3
voting rights as the Voting Common Stock (a "common stock
equivalent"); provided, however, if there are unavailable
sufficient shares (or fractions of shares) of Voting Common
Stock and/or common stock equivalents, then the Company shall
take all such action as may be necessary to authorize
additional shares of Voting Common Stock or common stock
equivalents for issuance upon exercise of the Rights,
including the calling of a meeting of shareholders; and
provided, further, that if the Company is unable to cause
sufficient shares of Voting Common Stock and/or common stock
equivalents to be available for issuance upon exercise in full
of the Rights, then the Company, to the extent necessary and
permitted by applicable law and any agreements or instruments
in effect on the date thereof to which it is a party, shall
make provision to pay an amount in cash equal to twice the
Purchase Price (as adjusted pursuant to this Section 11), in
lieu of issuing shares of Voting Common Stock and/or common
stock equivalents. To the extent that the Company determines
that some action needs to be taken pursuant to this Section
11(c), a majority of the Board of Directors may suspend the
exercisability of the Rights for a period of up to sixty (60)
days following the date on which the Section 11(b) Event shall
have occurred, in order to decide the appropriate form of
distribution to be made pursuant to this Section 11(c) and to
determine the value thereof. In the event of any such
suspension, the Company shall issue a public announcement
stating that the exercisability of the Rights has been
temporarily suspended. The Board of Directors may, but shall
not be required to, establish procedures to allocate the right
to receive Voting Common Stock and common stock equivalents
upon exercise of the Rights among holders of Rights, which
such allocation may be, but is not required to be, pro-rata.
5. Section 11(f)(ii) of the Rights Agreement is revised to read
in its entirety as follows:
(ii) For the purpose of any computation hereunder, the
"current market price" per share (or one one-hundred and
fiftieth of a share) of Preferred Stock shall be determined in
the same manner as set forth above for the Common Stock in
clause (i) of this Section 11(f) (other than the last sentence
thereof). If the current market price per share (or one
one-hundred fiftieth of a share) of Preferred Stock cannot be
determined in the manner provided above or if the Preferred
Stock is not publicly held or listed or traded in a manner
described in clause (i) of this Section 11(f), the "current
market price" per share of Preferred Stock shall be
conclusively deemed to be an amount equal to 150 (as such
number may be appropriately adjusted for such events as stock
splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations with respect to
the Voting Common Stock occurring after the date of this
Agreement) multiplied by the current market price per share of
the Voting Common Stock and the "current market price" per one
one-hundred fiftieth of a share of Preferred Stock shall be
equal to the current market price per share of the Voting
Common Stock (as appropriately adjusted). If neither the
Voting Common Stock nor the Preferred Stock is publicly held
or so listed or traded, "current market price" per share shall
mean the fair value per share as determined in good
3
4
faith by the Board of Directors, whose determination
shall be described in a statement filed with the Rights Agent
and shall be conclusive for all purposes.
6. Section 24(a) of the Rights Agreement is revised to read in
its entirety as follows:
(a) The Board of Directors of the Company may, at its option,
at any time after any Person becomes an Acquiring Person,
exchange all or part of the then outstanding and exercisable
Rights (which shall not include Rights that have become void
pursuant to the provisions of Section 7(e) hereof) for (i) in
the case of holders of Voting Common Stock, additional shares
of Voting Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one share of
Voting Common Stock per Right or (ii) in the case of holders
of Non-Voting Common Stock, additional shares of Non-Voting
Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one share of Non-Voting
Common Stock per Right, in either case appropriately adjusted
to reflect any stock split, stock dividend or similar
transaction occurring after the date hereof (such exchange
ratio being hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Ratio").
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors shall
not be empowered to effect such exchange at any time after any
Person (other than General American, the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company, any employee benefit plan or
compensation arrangement of the Company or any such
Subsidiary, or any entity holding securities of the Company to
the extent organized, appointed or established by the Company
or any such Subsidiary for or pursuant to the terms of any
such employee benefit plan or compensation arrangement),
together with all Affiliates and Associates of such Person,
becomes the Beneficial Owner of 50% or more of the Voting
Power of the Company.
7. For the purpose of adjusting for the Company's three-for-two
stock split in August 1997, wherever the phrase "one one-hundredth of a share"
appears in the text of the Rights Agreement for purposes of determining the
number of shares of Preferred Stock (as defined in the Rights Agreement) that
may be obtained upon exercise of a Right (as defined in the Rights Agreement),
it shall be replaced by the phrase "one one-hundred and fiftieth of a share,"
subject to further adjustment in accordance with Section 11 of the Rights
Agreement, but the phrase "one one-hundredth of a share" shall not be changed
for purposes of determining the Purchase Price (as such term is defined in the
Rights Agreement).
8. Except as specifically amended by this Second Amendment, the
Rights Agreement will continue unchanged and henceforth the term "Rights
Agreement" as used therein will mean the Rights Agreement as amended by the
Amendment dated as of July 26, 1995 and by this Second Amendment, unless and
until such Rights Agreement may again be amended.
9. This Second Amendment shall be effective upon the
effectiveness of the amendment to the Company's Restated Articles of
Incorporation to authorize the Non-Voting Common Stock.
4
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second
Amendment to be duly executed, all as of the day and year first above written.
Attest: REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED
/s/ James E. Sherman By: /s/ Jack B. Lay
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Name: James E. Sherman Name: Jack B. Lay
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Title: General Counsel and Secretary Title: Executive Vice President
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Attest: CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER
SERVICES, L.L.C.
/s/ Linda M. Welch By: /s/ H.E. Bradford
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Name: Linda M. Welch Name: H.E. Bradford
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Title: Assistant Vice President Title: Vice President
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
1
EXHIBIT 5.1
LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
500 N. BROADWAY, SUITE 2000
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63102-2147
TEL (314) 444-7600
FAX (314) 241-6056
May 4, 1998
Reinsurance Group of America,
Incorporated
660 Mason Ridge Center Drive
St. Louis, Missouri 63141-8557
RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3
Ladies and Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion in connection with the registration of
$316,250,000 of Non-Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for Reinsurance Group of America,
Incorporated, a Missouri corporation (the "Company").
As counsel to the Company, we have participated in the preparation of
the Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Registration Statement") with respect to the Non-Voting Common
Stock. We have examined and are familiar with the Restated Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company, proceedings of the Board of Directors
of the Company and such other corporate records, documents, certificates and
instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate in order to enable us to
render the opinion expressed below.
Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Non-Voting
Common Stock will, upon the effectiveness of the proposed amendment to the
Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation authorizing 20,000,000 shares of
Non-Voting Common Stock and the issuance and delivery of the Non-Voting Common
Stock in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Registration Statement,
be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
This opinion is rendered only with respect to the laws of the United
States of America, and the laws of the State of Missouri.
2
LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
May 4, 1998
Page 2
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the use of our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus filed as a part therof.
Very truly yours,
/s/ LEWIS RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.
Lewis Rice & Fingersh, L.C.
1
Exhibit 23.2
Independent Auditors' Consent
The Board of Directors
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated of our reports dated
January 29, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Reinsurance
Group of America, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1997, and all related schedules, which reports are included in the December
31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Reinsurance Group of America,
Incorporated, and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in
the prospectus.
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
May 4, 1998
